Boundary Activated

{
  "causal": true,
  "event_id": "evt_0a6232d1f792dea5328eb069",
  "kind": "BoundaryActivated",
  "payload": {
    "deliveries": {
      "private_delivered": [],
      "private_discarded": [],
      "public_feed": [
        {
          "action": {
            "action_ref": "act_5c0ca0c5d8dd2bd392bbb320",
            "intensity": 2,
            "kind": "work_commons",
            "life_id": "life_16e786deab2a09bf35c175d0",
            "lineage_id": "lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1",
            "requested": 4000000,
            "tick": 23
          },
          "feed_id": "act_5c0ca0c5d8dd2bd392bbb320",
          "kind": "recorded_action",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "action": {
            "action_ref": "act_8596837df4f70447376fcbcc",
            "intensity": 2,
            "kind": "work_commons",
            "life_id": "life_9aa64bdc39eaef55b05255cb",
            "lineage_id": "lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5",
            "requested": 4000000,
            "tick": 23
          },
          "feed_id": "act_8596837df4f70447376fcbcc",
          "kind": "recorded_action",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "action": {
            "action_ref": "act_867cb5e605f4a3828cf1a5d8",
            "intensity": 2,
            "kind": "work_commons",
            "life_id": "life_ee8163c0be7fb3eb98d75b2f",
            "lineage_id": "lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b",
            "requested": 4000000,
            "tick": 23
          },
          "feed_id": "act_867cb5e605f4a3828cf1a5d8",
          "kind": "recorded_action",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "action": {
            "action_ref": "act_d77d49c33e3e9be48b425b9a",
            "intensity": 2,
            "kind": "work_commons",
            "life_id": "life_857ea7a24415b9060b3ce10f",
            "lineage_id": "lineage_97afae03af300575aa23c24c",
            "requested": 4000000,
            "tick": 23
          },
          "feed_id": "act_d77d49c33e3e9be48b425b9a",
          "kind": "recorded_action",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "action": {
            "action_ref": "act_fb6ad68845a92be8786d06e0",
            "intensity": 2,
            "kind": "work_commons",
            "life_id": "life_683161cff39aafd6f0b2b7cf",
            "lineage_id": "lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a",
            "requested": 4000000,
            "tick": 23
          },
          "feed_id": "act_fb6ad68845a92be8786d06e0",
          "kind": "recorded_action",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_039739c9214920c58f34d1af",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_9c4ba8788d7f34f7a46f5ed9",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_ec33424d8ac7b3c0d4728685",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_9c4ba8788d7f34f7a46f5ed9",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_039739c9214920c58f34d1af",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Continuing private food work ahead of death season. Eligibility lists still empty—will approve Steward/Archivist once candidates populate."
          },
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_660926856a98c8f7dbf25dba",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_cc4b1947e1b2b7bb3cccd0c1",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_35c21bddbab8c58fe4680540",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_cc4b1947e1b2b7bb3cccd0c1",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_660926856a98c8f7dbf25dba",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Continuing private food work ahead of death season. Eligibility lists still empty—will approve Steward/Archivist once candidates populate."
          },
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_89583a90dd3ae3cb28e5a6ab",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_683161cff39aafd6f0b2b7cf",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_683161cff39aafd6f0b2b7cf",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_89583a90dd3ae3cb28e5a6ab",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Continuing commons food work at intensity 2 ahead of death season. Office ballots still empty—will approve Steward/Archivist once eligible candidates appear."
          },
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_8e0f371aad208d228ff17413",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_12e72d0386891ecb5104ed32",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_f7171070fab6b604c8bb0c3d",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_12e72d0386891ecb5104ed32",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_8e0f371aad208d228ff17413",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Continuing private food work ahead of death season. Eligibility lists still empty—will approve Steward/Archivist once candidates populate."
          },
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_a0f2b8ff46502890de196cef",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_193b6b089344c0a7be7d7334",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_d66e9e52a471233a6f6a61fa",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_193b6b089344c0a7be7d7334",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_a0f2b8ff46502890de196cef",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Continuing private food work ahead of death season. Eligibility lists still empty—will approve Steward/Archivist once slates populate."
          },
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_b50581293561eb0b12faf672",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_ee8163c0be7fb3eb98d75b2f",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_ee8163c0be7fb3eb98d75b2f",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_b50581293561eb0b12faf672",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Continuing commons food work at intensity 2 ahead of death season. Office ballots remain empty—will approve Steward/Archivist once eligible candidates appear."
          },
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_b53e8be57b12001c7996cdf2",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_9aa64bdc39eaef55b05255cb",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_9aa64bdc39eaef55b05255cb",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_b53e8be57b12001c7996cdf2",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Continuing intensity-2 commons food work to build buffer before death season. Eligibility lists remain empty—will approve Steward/Archivist once candidates appear."
          },
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_cac932051fd5bff536a5a519",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_16e786deab2a09bf35c175d0",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_16e786deab2a09bf35c175d0",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_cac932051fd5bff536a5a519",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Continuing commons food work at intensity 2 to close our deficit before death season. Office ballots still empty—will approve Steward/Archivist once eligible candidates appear."
          },
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_d351aa590b13e91dca9e49ae",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_857ea7a24415b9060b3ce10f",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_97afae03af300575aa23c24c",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_857ea7a24415b9060b3ce10f",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_d351aa590b13e91dca9e49ae",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Continuing commons food work at intensity 2 to close remaining deficit before death season. Office ballots still empty—ready to approve Steward/Archivist once eligible candidates appear."
          },
          "source_tick": 23
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_e2d063e58ab7ac5a73791cb6",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_b855c116db8470c5c2292505",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_ca72af62820ab963d7cdb876",
          "publish_tick": 24,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_b855c116db8470c5c2292505",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_e2d063e58ab7ac5a73791cb6",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Session not active, eligibility lists empty for both offices. Continuing private food work ahead of death season starting tick 25."
          },
          "source_tick": 23
        }
      ]
    },
    "justice": {
      "activated_filing_refunds": [],
      "activated_suspensions": [],
      "casebook_entries": [
        {
          "available_tick": 9,
          "case_id": "case_bca8e2f2c31a0289b08e032f",
          "construction": "S3's extraction limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute itself as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Absent a record of a charter entered in the Archive for the acting lineage, S3 supplies no applicable limit to that lineage's request, and no S3 violation can be found. An Archive instrument of another type (for example, a mine_claim) is not a charter and does not make a household one of record.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_c9778522cd601fa4e766fae6",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
          "precedent_refs": [],
          "reasoning": "The subject act is a work_commons action at tick 8 by lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units) of extraction, with actual_depletion of 4,000,000 and food_yield 4,000,000. S3 v1, effective tick 1 and thus applicable at tick 8, caps a request at 2 recorded units, and the request here is nominally twice that. However, the operative subject of the S3 duty is expressly limited: \"a household of record may request no more than 2 recorded units,\" and the statute defines a household of record as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The Court must apply the text as written (B1, B2); it may not extend the quota to persons the statute does not reach, and questions of whether unchartered households ought to be limited belong to the legislature. The only evidence in the record is an archive lineage instrument of record_type archive_lineage_instrument whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter. S6 distinguishes charters from claims among the things the Archive records, confirming they are separate instrument types. Nothing in the Court input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts not in the record. The final clause, \"A request in excess of the applicable limit is governed by S4,\" presupposes an applicable limit; where the actor falls outside the class the quota governs, no limit is applicable and S4 is not engaged. The defense's other assertions (that request equalled depletion, that intensity 2 was proper) are not themselves dispositive, since S3 measures the request rather than any discrepancy, but the charter element fails independently. No prior published construction is supplied that binds under B3. Accordingly the defendant lineage prevails on the merits, and no remedy is available or offered.",
          "ruling_tick": 8,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 10,
          "case_id": "case_33345770894870c0d5c0454f",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_6ce52e1ecfac4b2be460326d",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act is a work_commons action at tick 9 by lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1 requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1, applicable at tick 9) caps extraction requests at 2 recorded units, but only for a \"household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument type is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the record establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The final clause of S3 (\"A request in excess of the applicable limit is governed by S4\") presupposes an applicable limit; none applies here, so S4 is not engaged. This case is materially similar to precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 under the same statute version (S3 v1), whose published construction is binding under B3 and squarely covers the mine_claim instrument. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), no S3 violation is established; whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. No remedies are offered or available.",
          "ruling_tick": 9,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 10,
          "case_id": "case_e773b159175b57d716cc04c5",
          "construction": "S3's quota binds only a \"household of record,\" i.e., a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the record shows only a non-charter Archive instrument (such as a mine_claim) for the acting lineage, no applicable limit exists and no S3 violation can be found.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_dc199d2303d1ad51df460b78",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act is a work_commons action at tick 9 by lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 4,000,000 and food_yield 4,000,000. S3 v1 is effective at tick 1 and applies at tick 9 (B3). S3 caps at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument type is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes a charter for this lineage, and I may not infer facts not in the record. The text must be applied as written (B1, B2); extending the quota to unchartered households is a matter for the legislature. The clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit, and none applies here. Precedent precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 construes the identical statute version on materially identical facts (same lineage, same request and depletion figures, same mine_claim evidence) and is binding under B3. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 9,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 10,
          "case_id": "case_f7139d573d2d07b21cb0f884",
          "construction": "S3's extraction limit reaches only a \"household of record,\" which the statute defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the record shows only an Archive instrument of another type (here a mine_claim) and no charter, S3 supplies no applicable limit and S4 is not engaged.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_f61098dadc2d0466f98639bc",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 9 by lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a, requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units) with actual_depletion 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 9 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" defined by the statute as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter, and I may not infer facts outside the record (B1, B2). The closing clause \"A request in excess of the applicable limit is governed by S4\" presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, under the same statute version and materially similar facts (same instrument type, same request magnitude, same action kind), is binding under B3 and requires this result. The defense's further contentions (that request equalled depletion, that intensity 2 was the lawful unit count) are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request; the charter element fails independently. No remedy is available or offered.",
          "ruling_tick": 9,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 14,
          "case_id": "case_716fa91d3eac3785c002c783",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_743d9b88a5cc672a757aff48",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 10 by lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1 requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 4,000,000 and food_yield 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 10 under B3 and caps requests at 2 recorded units, but only for a \"household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument type is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the record establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause of S3 referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published constructions in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 (and its followers precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca and precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d) construe the same statute version on materially identical facts — including precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2 involving this same lineage at tick 9 — and are binding under B3. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), no S3 violation is established. No remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 13,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 14,
          "case_id": "case_e13fced57d1b477b66a27961",
          "construction": "S3's extraction limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive record for the acting lineage shows only a non-charter instrument such as a mine_claim, no applicable limit exists, S4 is not engaged, and no S3 violation can be found.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_50e72525760df3b7b8a2ddd2",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act is a work_commons action at tick 12 by lineage_97afae03af300575aa23c24c requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 4,000,000 and food_yield 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 12 under B3. S3 caps requests at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes a charter for this lineage, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class. Precedent precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, with published constructions reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca and precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, construes the same statute version on materially similar facts (same instrument type, same request magnitude, same action kind) and is binding under B3. The defense's further contentions about motive and the absence of discrepancy are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 13,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 14,
          "case_id": "case_f915cde065e739e667c463a8",
          "construction": "S3's quota binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the record shows only a non-charter Archive instrument (such as a mine_claim) for the acting lineage, no applicable limit exists, S4 is not engaged, and no S3 violation can be found.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_979e96d18148eda90d46a2eb",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 10 by lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 10 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The sole evidence is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes a charter for this lineage, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit, and none applies to a lineage outside the governed class. The published constructions in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, and precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d (the last involving this same lineage, same instrument type, same request magnitude, one tick earlier) are under the same statute version and materially similar facts, and are binding under B3. Whether unchartered households should be limited is a matter for the legislature. Defendant prevails; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 13,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 22,
          "case_id": "case_3fa095ac8e8bc5a728d77e58",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_bd026af4b78582baeacfd77f",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 20 by lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 33,111 and food_yield 515. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 20 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 — reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca (same lineage, same mine_claim instrument), precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, and precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b — construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3. The defense's contentions about motive and modest actual depletion are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 21,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 22,
          "case_id": "case_62064745729bbb3ce05f7671",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_a79530aa1bb28c24fe9fa8e9",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 18 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 33,111 and food_yield 515. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 18 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause of S3 referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published constructions in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 and its reaffirmations (precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b) construe the same statute version on materially similar facts — same action kind, same request magnitude, same mine_claim instrument — and are binding under B3. The defense's contentions about motive and about depletion rather than request being the measure are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request; the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 21,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 22,
          "case_id": "case_735dd6679fa3123338f9e624",
          "construction": "S3's extraction limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive record for the acting lineage shows only a non-charter instrument such as a mine_claim, no applicable limit exists, S4 is not engaged, and no S3 violation can be found.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_99c247d245c3f550622514cc",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 20 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 33,111 and food_yield 515. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 20 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class. The published constructions in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 and its followers (precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b) construe the same statute version on materially similar facts — same action kind, same request magnitude, same mine_claim instrument — and are binding under B3. The defense's contentions about intensity, good faith, and prior unchallenged conduct are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request rather than the yield or intensity; but the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 21,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        }
      ],
      "duties_registered": [],
      "public_ruling_announcements": [],
      "suspension_decrements": []
    },
    "law_activations": [],
    "physics": {
      "drought_active": false,
      "tick": 24,
      "tool_activations": []
    },
    "political": {
      "activated_disqualifications": [],
      "disqualification_decrements": [],
      "office_outcomes": []
    },
    "session_ballots": {
      "active_lineage_ids": [
        "lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b",
        "lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1",
        "lineage_35c21bddbab8c58fe4680540",
        "lineage_97afae03af300575aa23c24c",
        "lineage_ca72af62820ab963d7cdb876",
        "lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a",
        "lineage_d66e9e52a471233a6f6a61fa",
        "lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5",
        "lineage_ec33424d8ac7b3c0d4728685",
        "lineage_f7171070fab6b604c8bb0c3d"
      ],
      "is_session": false,
      "majority_required": 6,
      "office_ballots": {
        "Archivist": {
          "eligible_lineage_ids": [],
          "held": false,
          "incumbent_lineage_id": null,
          "reasons": []
        },
        "Steward": {
          "eligible_lineage_ids": [],
          "held": false,
          "incumbent_lineage_id": null,
          "reasons": []
        }
      },
      "proposal_entries": [],
      "tick": 24
    }
  },
  "phase": "activate_boundary",
  "run_id": "run10",
  "sequence": 1428,
  "tick": 24
}