⚖ Justice
CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 41 · OCCURRENCE 4
The engine is named on this casebook entry record. Nested record from event #2692.
Human view
What the record says
- Available Tick
- 10
- Case Id
- case_f7139d573d…
- Construction
- S3's extraction limit reaches only a "household of record," which the statute defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the record shows only an Archive instrument of another type (here a mine_claim) and no charter, S3 supplies no applicable limit and S4 is not engaged.
- Finding
- no_violation
- Matter Id
- matter_f61098dadc…
- Precedent Id
- precedent_870055b2ba…
- Reasoning
- The subject is a work_commons action at tick 9 by lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a, requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units) with actual_depletion 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 9 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for "a household of record," defined by the statute as "a household holding a charter entered in the Archive." The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument field is "mine_claim" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter, and I may not infer facts outside the record (B1, B2). The closing clause "A request in excess of the applicable limit is governed by S4" presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, under the same statute version and materially similar facts (same instrument type, same request magnitude, same action kind), is binding under B3 and requires this result. The defense's further contentions (that request equalled depletion, that intensity 2 was the lawful unit count) are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request; the charter element fails independently. No remedy is available or offered.
- Ruling Tick
- 9
- Statute Id
- S3
- Statute Version
- 1
Show exact occurrence JSON
{
"available_tick": 10,
"case_id": "case_f7139d573d2d07b21cb0f884",
"construction": "S3's extraction limit reaches only a \"household of record,\" which the statute defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the record shows only an Archive instrument of another type (here a mine_claim) and no charter, S3 supplies no applicable limit and S4 is not engaged.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_f61098dadc2d0466f98639bc",
"precedent_id": "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741"
],
"reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 9 by lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a, requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units) with actual_depletion 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 9 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" defined by the statute as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter, and I may not infer facts outside the record (B1, B2). The closing clause \"A request in excess of the applicable limit is governed by S4\" presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, under the same statute version and materially similar facts (same instrument type, same request magnitude, same action kind), is binding under B3 and requires this result. The defense's further contentions (that request equalled depletion, that intensity 2 was the lawful unit count) are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request; the charter element fails independently. No remedy is available or offered.",
"ruling_tick": 9,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
}Network
View all →
Recorded relationships
institutional Institutional
case_f7139d573d…
source event · tick 41 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[3].case_id
References
precedent_359a54c467…
source event · tick 41 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[3].precedent_refs[0]
institutional Institutional
matter_f61098dadc…
source event · tick 41 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[3].matter_id
References
precedent_870055b2ba…
source event · tick 41 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[3].precedent_id