References
precedent_555add59c0…
source event · tick 46 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[15].precedent_refs[5]
The engine is named on this casebook entry record. Nested record from event #3120.
{
"available_tick": 37,
"case_id": "case_4db2678e9e456abc8859d37d",
"construction": null,
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_5e4e4b1d6b74adc75dae4d42",
"precedent_id": "precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
"precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
"precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
"precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
"precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
"precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
"precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
"precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
"precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
"precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
"precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
"precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
"precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17"
],
"reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 34 by lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1 requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units) at intensity 2, with actual_depletion 30,101 and food_yield 468. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 34 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for a \"household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause of S3 referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 — several involving this same lineage and the same mine_claim instrument (precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2, precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37) — construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3. The defense's contentions about motive, trade, and modest depletion are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
"ruling_tick": 36,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
}