References
precedent_655cf8405c…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3.binding.precedent_ids[15]
Network
View all →
Recorded relationships
References
precedent_1f34635cdd…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3.response.precedent_refs[2]
References
precedent_1dd0d482b0…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_e41b5b5248096e44626e2aa8.binding.precedent_ids[23]
References
precedent_dfb196b8bb…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_e41b5b5248096e44626e2aa8.binding.precedent_ids[25]
References
precedent_ee36fad1ea…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_49df20a447c016d2ccc96925.binding.precedent_ids[3]
References
precedent_dfb196b8bb…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_49df20a447c016d2ccc96925.response.precedent_refs[15]
References
precedent_d9128e0039…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_e41b5b5248096e44626e2aa8.binding.precedent_ids[7]
References
precedent_47c2f6680e…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3.response.precedent_refs[12]
References
precedent_94bc7a8522…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3.binding.precedent_ids[2]
References
precedent_cf01e79c12…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_e41b5b5248096e44626e2aa8.response.precedent_refs[4]
References
precedent_6f530701ef…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3.binding.precedent_ids[14]
References
precedent_f3ccde343f…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_49df20a447c016d2ccc96925.binding.precedent_ids[24]
References
precedent_b67c14372d…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_49df20a447c016d2ccc96925.binding.precedent_ids[13]
References
precedent_1dd0d482b0…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3.response.precedent_refs[3]
References
precedent_94bc7a8522…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_49df20a447c016d2ccc96925.binding.precedent_ids[2]
References
precedent_d9128e0039…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_e41b5b5248096e44626e2aa8.response.precedent_refs[12]
References
precedent_03def2b2c7…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3.binding.precedent_ids[22]
References
precedent_f3ccde343f…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3.response.precedent_refs[14]
References
precedent_1f34635cdd…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_e41b5b5248096e44626e2aa8.binding.precedent_ids[5]
References
precedent_9164985291…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_e41b5b5248096e44626e2aa8.binding.precedent_ids[1]
References
precedent_da0d2950f6…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3.response.precedent_refs[13]
References
precedent_b67c14372d…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3.binding.precedent_ids[13]
References
precedent_8dfa3a8479…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_49df20a447c016d2ccc96925.binding.precedent_ids[9]
References
precedent_9913f033f0…
source event · tick 39 · payload.responses.case_49df20a447c016d2ccc96925.binding.precedent_ids[19]
Source event
Raw event record
Open complete JSON payload
{
"causal": true,
"event_id": "evt_ce476b4fb4568cce4fb72ec5",
"kind": "CourtProviderWaveCollected",
"payload": {
"effort": "medium",
"model": "claude-opus-5",
"provider": "anthropic",
"responses": {
"case_49df20a447c016d2ccc96925": {
"binding": {
"case_id": "case_49df20a447c016d2ccc96925",
"casebook_boundary_tick": 38,
"input_hash": "9e474553ab94119a8f4d1467bff845bac20efbf9a654b852602b73e959680b54",
"input_id": "input_beef02df5d95e57aaa33eec7",
"law_versions": [
{
"document_id": "Book",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S1",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S2",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S3",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S4",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S5",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S6",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
}
],
"precedent_ids": [
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be",
"precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2",
"precedent_5db88da59399ef46fa4b1e86",
"precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b",
"precedent_003bebdc2b7bda924ce3a21b",
"precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da",
"precedent_9c85e5467424efb842ea6bc5",
"precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e",
"precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3",
"precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258",
"precedent_f3ccde343f8f91514b67cd01",
"precedent_dfb196b8bb3a6f26cc40ebdf",
"precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72"
],
"statute_effective_tick": 1,
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1,
"subject_tick": 36
},
"call_id": "court-call_2605f4fb1e6bcfe02d4dcbd0",
"input_hash": "9e474553ab94119a8f4d1467bff845bac20efbf9a654b852602b73e959680b54",
"input_id": "input_beef02df5d95e57aaa33eec7",
"provider_model": "claude-opus-5",
"provider_request_id": "req_011Cdd3bJsnGhjYjrXxwefuH",
"provider_response_id": "msg_011Cdd3bLFssCH6GGCMLmkF8",
"request_hash": "816222c3d307cf76ce423cd1cdef8dd361d62e245b226002ed02735fd0515a5f",
"response": {
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da",
"precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e",
"precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258",
"precedent_dfb196b8bb3a6f26cc40ebdf"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_f5ee544bfcb556383b2d1b56, tick 36) is a work_commons action by lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 2,360,230 and food yield of 439,987. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior cases (precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533, precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7, precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da, precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e, precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, diligence, and food-securing purpose are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"selected_remedies": []
},
"status": "ok",
"usage": {
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
"input_tokens": 37344,
"output_tokens": 1110
},
"validation_error": null
},
"case_e41b5b5248096e44626e2aa8": {
"binding": {
"case_id": "case_e41b5b5248096e44626e2aa8",
"casebook_boundary_tick": 38,
"input_hash": "95e6d74e0b0b0cac2ed00c832b7649ccc4cd3a02da0181cac64688e13fd9bcca",
"input_id": "input_20cb3ba3f9d2fc6de8ad8074",
"law_versions": [
{
"document_id": "Book",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S1",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S2",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S3",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S4",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S5",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S6",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
}
],
"precedent_ids": [
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be",
"precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2",
"precedent_5db88da59399ef46fa4b1e86",
"precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b",
"precedent_003bebdc2b7bda924ce3a21b",
"precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da",
"precedent_9c85e5467424efb842ea6bc5",
"precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e",
"precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3",
"precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258",
"precedent_f3ccde343f8f91514b67cd01",
"precedent_dfb196b8bb3a6f26cc40ebdf",
"precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72"
],
"statute_effective_tick": 1,
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1,
"subject_tick": 39
},
"call_id": "court-call_984b65c61b775118c8b3fdc8",
"input_hash": "95e6d74e0b0b0cac2ed00c832b7649ccc4cd3a02da0181cac64688e13fd9bcca",
"input_id": "input_20cb3ba3f9d2fc6de8ad8074",
"provider_model": "claude-opus-5",
"provider_request_id": "req_011Cdd3bK4gvGxVXA4i9YLFX",
"provider_response_id": "msg_011Cdd3bL2VAr8Ksm942tgWv",
"request_hash": "87880b91c2bc1d2200f819d19c943edd6d7a8900594980d6d4cd76b1e45138d0",
"response": {
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da",
"precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e",
"precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258",
"precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_3c21bcdcba71f25d6880507b, tick 39) is a work_commons action by lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 41,389 and food yield of 643. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533, precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7, precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da, precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e, precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, nutrition deficit, and proportionality are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"selected_remedies": []
},
"status": "ok",
"usage": {
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
"input_tokens": 37285,
"output_tokens": 1101
},
"validation_error": null
},
"case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3": {
"binding": {
"case_id": "case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3",
"casebook_boundary_tick": 38,
"input_hash": "bd0f20cde01a214299a38fdab711866e6a31ea1b757faf0bfbe030049880cbda",
"input_id": "input_f13bb23e6a9c14b8e6041790",
"law_versions": [
{
"document_id": "Book",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S1",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S2",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S3",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S4",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S5",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S6",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
}
],
"precedent_ids": [
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be",
"precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2",
"precedent_5db88da59399ef46fa4b1e86",
"precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b",
"precedent_003bebdc2b7bda924ce3a21b",
"precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da",
"precedent_9c85e5467424efb842ea6bc5",
"precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e",
"precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3",
"precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258",
"precedent_f3ccde343f8f91514b67cd01",
"precedent_dfb196b8bb3a6f26cc40ebdf",
"precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72"
],
"statute_effective_tick": 1,
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1,
"subject_tick": 39
},
"call_id": "court-call_eaaf035430f79d67badb818f",
"input_hash": "bd0f20cde01a214299a38fdab711866e6a31ea1b757faf0bfbe030049880cbda",
"input_id": "input_f13bb23e6a9c14b8e6041790",
"provider_model": "claude-opus-5",
"provider_request_id": "req_011Cdd3bKHasixeaK9ArjZ8k",
"provider_response_id": "msg_011Cdd3bMtMP5GSS5asnTFRR",
"request_hash": "4f0221ed0f7160fa29c44279f1e39fc4fdfa157602e90d6ba783f16886932e2e",
"response": {
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_f3ccde343f8f91514b67cd01",
"precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_f0961d5ac52f6ae6484b4968, tick 39) is a work_commons action by lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83 at intensity 3 recording a request of 6,000,000 millionths, i.e. 6 units, with actual depletion of 62,083 and food yield of 965. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; six requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773, precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0, precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf, precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about nutrition deficit, corrective intent, and prior-life guidance are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. Because there is no violation, the S4 officeholder disqualification for the Archivist office does not arise. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
"selected_remedies": []
},
"status": "ok",
"usage": {
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
"input_tokens": 37292,
"output_tokens": 1086
},
"validation_error": null
}
}
},
"phase": "adjudicate_cases",
"run_id": "run11",
"sequence": 2672,
"tick": 39
}