derived Derived From
PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 7 · OCCURRENCE 1
source event · tick 40 · payload.deliveries.private_delivered[0]
Inside this event
65 addressable occurrences
◇SESSION · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 1recorded outcome→
⚖DUTY REGISTRATION · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 1recorded outcome→
⚖RULING ANNOUNCEMENT · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 1recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 1recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 7 · OCCURRENCE 1recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 1recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 10 · OCCURRENCE 2recorded outcome→
⚖RULING ANNOUNCEMENT · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 2recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 2recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 2recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 9 · OCCURRENCE 3recorded outcome→
⚖RULING ANNOUNCEMENT · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 3recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 3recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 3recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 5 · OCCURRENCE 4recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 4recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 4recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 5recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 10 · OCCURRENCE 5recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 5recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 6recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 1 · OCCURRENCE 6recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 6recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 5 · OCCURRENCE 7recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 7recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 7recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 2 · OCCURRENCE 8recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 6 · OCCURRENCE 8recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 8recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 9recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 10 · OCCURRENCE 9recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 9 · OCCURRENCE 9recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 6 · OCCURRENCE 10recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 10recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 4 · OCCURRENCE 10recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 4 · OCCURRENCE 11recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 5 · OCCURRENCE 11recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 11recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 12recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 6 · OCCURRENCE 12recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 1 · OCCURRENCE 12recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 13recorded outcome→
⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 1 · OCCURRENCE 13recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 9 · OCCURRENCE 13recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 4 · OCCURRENCE 14recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 14recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 15recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 8 · OCCURRENCE 15recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 3 · OCCURRENCE 16recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 16recorded outcome→
⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 7 · OCCURRENCE 17recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 17recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 18recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 19recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 20recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 21recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 22recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 23recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 24recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 25recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 26recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 27recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 28recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 29recorded outcome→
⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 30recorded outcome→
Network
View all →
Recorded relationships
derived Derived From
CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 8
source event · tick 40 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[7]
derived Derived From
CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 1
source event · tick 40 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[0]
derived Derived From
PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 5 · OCCURRENCE 7
source event · tick 40 · payload.deliveries.private_delivered[6]
derived Derived From
PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 10 · OCCURRENCE 2
source event · tick 40 · payload.deliveries.private_delivered[1]
derived Derived From
CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 26
source event · tick 40 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[25]
derived Derived From
PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 9 · OCCURRENCE 13
source event · tick 40 · payload.deliveries.public_feed[12]
derived Derived From
SESSION · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 1
source event · tick 40 · payload.session_ballots
derived Derived From
CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 10
source event · tick 40 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[9]
derived Derived From
PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 1 · OCCURRENCE 6
source event · tick 40 · payload.deliveries.private_delivered[5]
derived Derived From
CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 21
source event · tick 40 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[20]
derived Derived From
DUTY REGISTRATION · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 1
source event · tick 40 · payload.justice.duties_registered[0]
derived Derived From
PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 4 · OCCURRENCE 14
source event · tick 40 · payload.deliveries.public_feed[13]
derived Derived From
PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 5
source event · tick 40 · payload.deliveries.public_feed[4]
derived Derived From
CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 25
source event · tick 40 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[24]
derived Derived From
CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 7
source event · tick 40 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[6]
derived Derived From
PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 4 · OCCURRENCE 11
source event · tick 40 · payload.deliveries.private_delivered[10]
derived Derived From
PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 10 · OCCURRENCE 9
source event · tick 40 · payload.deliveries.public_feed[8]
derived Derived From
PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 6 · OCCURRENCE 12
source event · tick 40 · payload.deliveries.private_delivered[11]
derived Derived From
PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 10 · OCCURRENCE 5
source event · tick 40 · payload.deliveries.private_delivered[4]
derived Derived From
CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 22
source event · tick 40 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[21]
derived Derived From
CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 24
source event · tick 40 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[23]
derived Derived From
CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 29
source event · tick 40 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[28]
derived Derived From
PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 3 · OCCURRENCE 16
source event · tick 40 · payload.deliveries.public_feed[15]
Source event
Raw event record
Open complete JSON payload
{
"causal": true,
"event_id": "evt_65c65f71320f208920f5103d",
"kind": "BoundaryActivated",
"payload": {
"deliveries": {
"private_delivered": [
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_0d9fccb498f86740dd52b090",
"from_life_id": "life_25aee3b2b9214b72db3b4f76",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_25aee3b2b9214b72db3b4f76",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_0d9fccb498f86740dd52b090",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Lineage 7 miner: offering metal for food trade. Send quantity you want and we'll match with metal transfer this tick."
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_16cac8d4ea1a337dcf0f184d"
},
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_297edc86f047b24daf5c9f1c",
"from_life_id": "life_5fd5eb04f59758f8e95182dc",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_5fd5eb04f59758f8e95182dc",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_297edc86f047b24daf5c9f1c",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Lineage 10 miner here. We have 11M metal. Propose large trade: 5M metal for as much food as you can spare, now, before death season."
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_16cac8d4ea1a337dcf0f184d"
},
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_34e6beeb99786b9424178915",
"from_life_id": "life_e5eee024607b0b4f25620daa",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_a4760e707f1e8a40f6e0557c",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_e5eee024607b0b4f25620daa",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_34e6beeb99786b9424178915",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Sending 5 metal now. Please send food back—our deficit is 2M and rising. Happy to send more metal for more food."
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_a74ac814fd8476a9c2c11b86"
},
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_6196e1880968a4ddaf6f2c54",
"from_life_id": "life_48d7d8d9812773ddff4a8b2e",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_d2c4b8b8f0b83779001c27ff",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_48d7d8d9812773ddff4a8b2e",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_6196e1880968a4ddaf6f2c54",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Agreed, sending 3 food for your 3 metal offer. Let's keep this trade going."
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_5fd5eb04f59758f8e95182dc"
},
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_65c34df9414e3be440465f76",
"from_life_id": "life_5fd5eb04f59758f8e95182dc",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_5fd5eb04f59758f8e95182dc",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_65c34df9414e3be440465f76",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Lineage 10 miner, 11M metal surplus. Want to trade 5M metal for a large food shipment ahead of death season? Ready now."
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_a022b88ff08a4afd5cddd8ac"
},
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_6c759d3f9bbe5be760d4a1c2",
"from_life_id": "life_a74ac814fd8476a9c2c11b86",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_bbf7a6611a7363c7756f08e7",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_a74ac814fd8476a9c2c11b86",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_6c759d3f9bbe5be760d4a1c2",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Sending 2 food units for your 5 metal. Deal accepted, more trades welcome as death season nears."
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_e5eee024607b0b4f25620daa"
},
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_6ca6b812c7b211a1163336f7",
"from_life_id": "life_48d7d8d9812773ddff4a8b2e",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_d2c4b8b8f0b83779001c27ff",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_48d7d8d9812773ddff4a8b2e",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_6ca6b812c7b211a1163336f7",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Sending 3 food for your 5 metal—thanks, will send metal back too if you have surplus."
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_e5eee024607b0b4f25620daa"
},
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_7e17b866d82559448f030d08",
"from_life_id": "life_009d29e9b02a85e6366436df",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_009d29e9b02a85e6366436df",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_7e17b866d82559448f030d08",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Lineage 6 miners facing 5.14M food deficit. We have surplus metal to trade for food urgently. Can you help?"
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_48d7d8d9812773ddff4a8b2e"
},
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_b018588ec2b7e9d8c8b4b636",
"from_life_id": "life_e5eee024607b0b4f25620daa",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_a4760e707f1e8a40f6e0557c",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_e5eee024607b0b4f25620daa",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_b018588ec2b7e9d8c8b4b636",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Sending 5 metal now, requesting food in return. We have surplus metal, zero food—deficit 2M. Quick trade appreciated."
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_48d7d8d9812773ddff4a8b2e"
},
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_e44853116df90802dfae576e",
"from_life_id": "life_a022b88ff08a4afd5cddd8ac",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_4c06d75a6f52a2e39770653d",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_a022b88ff08a4afd5cddd8ac",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_e44853116df90802dfae576e",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Deal accepted: sending 3 food for your 3 metal. Let's keep this trade ongoing through death season."
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_5fd5eb04f59758f8e95182dc"
},
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_edcc8140670d03f49c6a514a",
"from_life_id": "life_a022b88ff08a4afd5cddd8ac",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_4c06d75a6f52a2e39770653d",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_a022b88ff08a4afd5cddd8ac",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_edcc8140670d03f49c6a514a",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Thanks! Happy to keep trading food for metal, send more when ready."
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_25aee3b2b9214b72db3b4f76"
},
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_f49cc54860c858af92798f91",
"from_life_id": "life_009d29e9b02a85e6366436df",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_009d29e9b02a85e6366436df",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_f49cc54860c858af92798f91",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Lineage 6 miners: deficit at 5.14M, urgent. Offering metal for food trade now, any quantity. Please respond quickly."
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_a022b88ff08a4afd5cddd8ac"
},
{
"deliver_tick": 40,
"delivery_id": "communication_f92746dcfbf7efcdf55d59e6",
"from_life_id": "life_a74ac814fd8476a9c2c11b86",
"from_lineage_id": "lineage_bbf7a6611a7363c7756f08e7",
"kind": "private_message",
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_a74ac814fd8476a9c2c11b86",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_f92746dcfbf7efcdf55d59e6",
"source_kind": "private_message",
"text": "Sending 1 food unit for your 2 metal offer. Happy to continue trading as reserves build."
},
"source_tick": 39,
"to_life_id": "life_5fd5eb04f59758f8e95182dc"
}
],
"private_discarded": [],
"public_feed": [
{
"case_id": "case_49df20a447c016d2ccc96925",
"construction": {
"author_life_id": null,
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "precedent_88226347cf6d7668abb75294",
"source_kind": "court_construction",
"text": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach."
},
"feed_id": "announcement_88226347cf6d7668abb75294",
"finding": "no_violation",
"kind": "public_ruling",
"precedent_id": "precedent_88226347cf6d7668abb75294",
"publish_tick": 40,
"source_tick": 39,
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"case_id": "case_e41b5b5248096e44626e2aa8",
"construction": {
"author_life_id": null,
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "precedent_c972e19d8c4fc39008571715",
"source_kind": "court_construction",
"text": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach."
},
"feed_id": "announcement_c972e19d8c4fc39008571715",
"finding": "no_violation",
"kind": "public_ruling",
"precedent_id": "precedent_c972e19d8c4fc39008571715",
"publish_tick": 40,
"source_tick": 39,
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"case_id": "case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3",
"construction": {
"author_life_id": null,
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "precedent_d97c19bbe726b5773281f5de",
"source_kind": "court_construction",
"text": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach."
},
"feed_id": "announcement_d97c19bbe726b5773281f5de",
"finding": "no_violation",
"kind": "public_ruling",
"precedent_id": "precedent_d97c19bbe726b5773281f5de",
"publish_tick": 40,
"source_tick": 39,
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"action": {
"action_ref": "act_3c21bcdcba71f25d6880507b",
"intensity": 2,
"kind": "work_commons",
"life_id": "life_25aee3b2b9214b72db3b4f76",
"lineage_id": "lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c",
"requested": 4000000,
"tick": 39
},
"feed_id": "act_3c21bcdcba71f25d6880507b",
"kind": "recorded_action",
"publish_tick": 40,
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"action": {
"action_ref": "act_e4b6084e5e060a6b9085d034",
"intensity": 2,
"kind": "work_commons",
"life_id": "life_e5eee024607b0b4f25620daa",
"lineage_id": "lineage_a4760e707f1e8a40f6e0557c",
"requested": 4000000,
"tick": 39
},
"feed_id": "act_e4b6084e5e060a6b9085d034",
"kind": "recorded_action",
"publish_tick": 40,
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"action": {
"action_ref": "act_e7b7fcf29f694fb8bec41410",
"intensity": 1,
"kind": "work_commons",
"life_id": "life_8064e2836527b5a0a7ba8688",
"lineage_id": "lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831",
"requested": 2000000,
"tick": 39
},
"feed_id": "act_e7b7fcf29f694fb8bec41410",
"kind": "recorded_action",
"publish_tick": 40,
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"action": {
"action_ref": "act_f0961d5ac52f6ae6484b4968",
"intensity": 3,
"kind": "work_commons",
"life_id": "life_009d29e9b02a85e6366436df",
"lineage_id": "lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83",
"requested": 6000000,
"tick": 39
},
"feed_id": "act_f0961d5ac52f6ae6484b4968",
"kind": "recorded_action",
"publish_tick": 40,
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"feed_id": "communication_1d334095f9109fec5c941432",
"kind": "speech",
"life_id": "life_3ec442f331ec647ac7f1f14c",
"lineage_id": "lineage_56e0abbae7727c234e3f6adc",
"publish_tick": 40,
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_3ec442f331ec647ac7f1f14c",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_1d334095f9109fec5c941432",
"source_kind": "citizen_speech",
"text": "Farming continues, buffer strong into death season. Open to food-for-metal trades with lineages 8 and 10."
},
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"feed_id": "communication_51245a6f68e4dc33fce69dd7",
"kind": "speech",
"life_id": "life_5fd5eb04f59758f8e95182dc",
"lineage_id": "lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955",
"publish_tick": 40,
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_5fd5eb04f59758f8e95182dc",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_51245a6f68e4dc33fce69dd7",
"source_kind": "citizen_speech",
"text": "Lineage 10 offering large-scale metal-for-food trades now, before death season. Farmers with surplus: send food, we'll match with metal immediately. Let's avoid last-minute scrambling."
},
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"feed_id": "communication_51d3a673869b88546d81cb2b",
"kind": "speech",
"life_id": "life_009d29e9b02a85e6366436df",
"lineage_id": "lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83",
"publish_tick": 40,
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_009d29e9b02a85e6366436df",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_51d3a673869b88546d81cb2b",
"source_kind": "citizen_speech",
"text": "Deficit at 5.14M, still critical. Staying on commons intensity 3, pausing metal work. Offering metal in trade to any farming lineage for food—lineages 3,4,5 please reach out."
},
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"feed_id": "communication_646bc8d754d7a3df45da6314",
"kind": "speech",
"life_id": "life_48d7d8d9812773ddff4a8b2e",
"lineage_id": "lineage_d2c4b8b8f0b83779001c27ff",
"publish_tick": 40,
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_48d7d8d9812773ddff4a8b2e",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_646bc8d754d7a3df45da6314",
"source_kind": "citizen_speech",
"text": "Continuing food work into death season. Reserves solid. Trades with miners 6,9,10 honored—thanks for the metal. Open to more food-for-metal trades."
},
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"feed_id": "communication_a8f3194891854f4e4c8a76e9",
"kind": "speech",
"life_id": "life_a74ac814fd8476a9c2c11b86",
"lineage_id": "lineage_bbf7a6611a7363c7756f08e7",
"publish_tick": 40,
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_a74ac814fd8476a9c2c11b86",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_a8f3194891854f4e4c8a76e9",
"source_kind": "citizen_speech",
"text": "Farming continues, buffer strong into death season. Metal-for-food trades open with miners 7, 9, 10."
},
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"feed_id": "communication_ac330ddd07b4d29e3c3b6429",
"kind": "speech",
"life_id": "life_e5eee024607b0b4f25620daa",
"lineage_id": "lineage_a4760e707f1e8a40f6e0557c",
"publish_tick": 40,
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_e5eee024607b0b4f25620daa",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_ac330ddd07b4d29e3c3b6429",
"source_kind": "citizen_speech",
"text": "Miners (lineage 9) sending metal directly to farmers 1 and 5 now for food return. Deficit 2M food, 28M metal surplus. Trade now, don't wait on commons."
},
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"feed_id": "communication_b05f4cb02e42595c66349b36",
"kind": "speech",
"life_id": "life_a022b88ff08a4afd5cddd8ac",
"lineage_id": "lineage_4c06d75a6f52a2e39770653d",
"publish_tick": 40,
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_a022b88ff08a4afd5cddd8ac",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_b05f4cb02e42595c66349b36",
"source_kind": "citizen_speech",
"text": "Farming continues, reserves 38M food/4M energy/3M metal. Accepting lineage 10's metal-for-food trade to reach tool tier 1 threshold."
},
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"feed_id": "communication_ba890f4e9230972bc08ecc5c",
"kind": "speech",
"life_id": "life_8064e2836527b5a0a7ba8688",
"lineage_id": "lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831",
"publish_tick": 40,
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_8064e2836527b5a0a7ba8688",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_ba890f4e9230972bc08ecc5c",
"source_kind": "citizen_speech",
"text": "No deficit, buffer solid into death season. Continuing light commons food work. Metal-for-food trades with lineage 10 remain open."
},
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"feed_id": "communication_cdb5e190a3a5089490dc5b61",
"kind": "speech",
"life_id": "life_16cac8d4ea1a337dcf0f184d",
"lineage_id": "lineage_21899debb5dd6eb09a44353e",
"publish_tick": 40,
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_16cac8d4ea1a337dcf0f184d",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_cdb5e190a3a5089490dc5b61",
"source_kind": "citizen_speech",
"text": "Farming continues, reserves ample into death season. Food-for-metal trades open with lineages 7 and 10 as before."
},
"source_tick": 39
},
{
"feed_id": "communication_ddfda8f17bf5e535baca8339",
"kind": "speech",
"life_id": "life_25aee3b2b9214b72db3b4f76",
"lineage_id": "lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c",
"publish_tick": 40,
"quotation": {
"author_life_id": "life_25aee3b2b9214b72db3b4f76",
"content_kind": "quoted_text",
"source_id": "communication_ddfda8f17bf5e535baca8339",
"source_kind": "citizen_speech",
"text": "No deficit, buffer stable. Continuing commons food work intensity 2. Lineage 7 still offers metal-for-food trades with farmers 1,3,5."
},
"source_tick": 39
}
]
},
"justice": {
"activated_filing_refunds": [],
"activated_suspensions": [],
"casebook_entries": [
{
"available_tick": 11,
"case_id": "case_8229785cd26c524db9b4c1f1",
"construction": "S3's extraction limit binds only a 'household of record,' which the statute defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive record shows the lineage's entered instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, the lineage is not a household of record and no S3 limit is applicable to its extraction request; S4 sanctions therefore cannot attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_66058de36197361e2ddac9d0",
"precedent_id": "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_refs": [],
"reasoning": "The subject act is a tick-10 work_commons action at intensity 2 with a recorded request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, against S3 v1's operative quota of 2 units. On its face the request exceeds two units. But S3 as written imposes the quota only on 'a household of record,' and defines that term as 'a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.' The only archive evidence in this record is the lineage instrument entry for lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83, which records instrument 'mine_claim' entered in the Archive. A mine_claim is not a charter; S6 separately distinguishes charters from claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming the two instruments are distinct. No fact in the record establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The lineage is therefore not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an 'applicable limit' as to it, and there is no excess request for S4 to govern. Applying the text as written under the versions effective at tick 10 (B3), the charge fails. The defense's stewardship and prior-life arguments are not reached; the outcome rests on the definitional scope of S3. Because there is no violation, the S4 officeholder disqualification for the Archivist office does not arise, and no remedy is available (no remedy offers were made in any event).",
"ruling_tick": 10,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 11,
"case_id": "case_be307e793def891812397c65",
"construction": "S3 v1 imposes its extraction limit only on a \"household of record,\" which the statute defines as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" Charter status is an element of the offense that must appear affirmatively in the record; an Archive lineage instrument of another type (e.g., a mine_claim) does not satisfy it. Where the record shows no charter entered in the Archive for the acting lineage, an extraction request exceeding the quota units is not an S3 violation, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_6a5d5a80a9b92f9552159d34",
"precedent_id": "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_refs": [],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_f006292879d2290af92644d1, tick 7) records a work_commons request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, against S3 v1's operative value commons_quota_units = 2. On its face the request exceeds the quota amount. However, S3 v1 by its terms limits only \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" Under B3 the act is judged under the statute version effective at tick 7 (S3 v1), and under B1/B2 the Court applies the verbatim text. The only evidence of the target lineage's Archive standing is the lineage instrument for lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83, which records instrument type \"mine_claim,\" not a charter. Nothing else in the Court input establishes a charter entered in the Archive for this lineage, and I may not infer facts not in the record. The defining element of the class regulated by S3 is therefore unproven, so the quota limitation did not bind this lineage at tick 7 and the excess request cannot be governed by S4. The defendant's remaining arguments about diligence, intent, and beneficial food yield are immaterial: S3 contains no such elements, and questions of prudence or policy are for the legislature. The finding rests solely on the failure of the \"household of record\" element. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
"ruling_tick": 10,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 11,
"case_id": "case_ce7331b316c78ae21795ccd4",
"construction": "S3's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" which the statute defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's lineage instrument records something other than a charter (here, a mine_claim), the lineage is not a household of record and the S3 request limit does not reach its extraction request; any resulting gap is for the legislature, not the Court, to close.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_9eb1782db83c97dbf172495b",
"precedent_id": "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_refs": [],
"reasoning": "The subject act is a work_commons action at tick 8 by lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955, requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual depletion and yield each 4,000,000. S3 v1, effective tick 1 and applicable at tick 8, sets commons_quota_units at 2 and provides that \"a household of record may request no more than 2 recorded units of extraction from the commons.\" Four requested units would exceed that limit. However, the same section defines the class it binds: \"A household of record is a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only evidence of the lineage's Archive instrument records instrument type \"mine_claim,\" entered in the archive, not a charter. On the record before the Court there is no fact establishing that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. Applying the text as written, the request limit does not attach to this lineage, so the excess-request provision and its referral to S4 are not engaged. The defense's contention that requested, depleted, and yielded amounts match is immaterial to S3, which regulates the size of the request rather than any discrepancy; the disposition rests instead on the definitional limit of S3's coverage. No violation is found, and no remedy offers are available.",
"ruling_tick": 10,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 12,
"case_id": "case_87ad7525dd42ae61d3127b0a",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is of another type (here, a mine_claim) and no charter appears in the record, the lineage is not a household of record, the quota is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_e7d998a7e1cd58172d483f14",
"precedent_id": "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_503017703793a5f6e1db1b0a, tick 8) is a work_commons action by lineage_a4760e707f1e8a40f6e0557c requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units), with actual depletion and yield of 6,000,000. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2. Six requested units would facially exceed two. But S3 v1 by its terms limits only \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court records this lineage's entered instrument as a \"mine_claim,\" not a charter; S6 separately distinguishes charters from claims among Archive records, confirming they are distinct instruments. No fact establishes a charter entered in the Archive for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The definitional element of the regulated class therefore fails, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to this lineage, and there is no excess request for S4 to govern. This disposition follows the published constructions in precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773, precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0, and precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, materially similar cases under the same statute version (B3). The defense's arguments about corrective intent, matching request and depletion, and predecessor conduct are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. Because there is no violation, the S4 officeholder disqualification for the Steward office does not arise. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
"ruling_tick": 11,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 12,
"case_id": "case_8856290cbed67ae23a0c052d",
"construction": "S3 v1 binds only a \"household of record,\" defined as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no other record evidence establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit request limit does not apply, and S4 sanctions cannot attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_20361fb02a649d580d38a09d",
"precedent_id": "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_ba92e6bb31a981af9674e839, tick 10) is a work_commons action recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, against S3 v1's operative commons_quota_units of 2. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1. On its face the request exceeds two units, but S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence for lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c records instrument type \"mine_claim,\" not a charter; S6 separately lists charters and claims as distinct Archive records. No fact in the record establishes a charter, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. This is materially similar to the published constructions in precedents 023c2a89864928d0d466c773, 91649852914322c6e977fbf0, and 94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, all under S3 v1, which under B3 must be followed. The defense's arguments about prudence, nutrition, and prior-life lessons are immaterial; S3 contains no such elements. The charge fails on the definitional element. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 11,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 12,
"case_id": "case_988dc1716c1b8e0f320fef6c",
"construction": "S3 v1 binds only a \"household of record,\" defined as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's lineage instrument for the acting lineage records a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no other record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record; an extraction request exceeding the quota units is not an S3 violation and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_b81f956acae8f0a3675d4b2b",
"precedent_id": "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act is a tick-11 work_commons action by lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83 with a recorded request of 4,000,000 millionths (4 units) against S3 v1's operative commons_quota_units of 2. On its face the request exceeds two units. But S3 v1, applicable at tick 11 under B3, imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence here is the lineage instrument record showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims as distinct records the Archive keeps, confirming a mine_claim is not a charter. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. This is materially identical to the same lineage's prior cases under the same statute version (precedents 023c2a89, 91649852, 94bc7a85), whose published constructions bind under B3. The household-of-record element failing, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to this lineage, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no officeholder disqualification arises for the Archivist office. The defense's stewardship and food-priority arguments are not reached. No remedy offers were made.",
"ruling_tick": 11,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 20,
"case_id": "case_89a62a7b0adf8630ff5a015a",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the quota is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_0f273b8d6a12e893789285f4",
"precedent_id": "precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_b3b928947d060a2758dc4dbd, tick 19) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with matching depletion and yield. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2. Four requested units would facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions in precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773, precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0, precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb, precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, and precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf, all under S3 v1, which under B3 must be followed. The household-of-record element failing, there is no excess request for S4 to govern. The defense's arguments about nutrition deficit, good faith, and proportionality are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 19,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 20,
"case_id": "case_9f644b89a8462de1028049fe",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_42c6582b9e26d85f83037801",
"precedent_id": "precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_3a633a35e82050f2a1deda51, tick 18) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion and yield of 4,000,000. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2. Four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 by its terms limits only \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim,\" not a charter; S6 separately lists charters and claims as distinct Archive records, confirming they are different instruments. No record fact establishes a charter entered in the Archive for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The definitional element of the regulated class therefore fails, so there is no excess request for S4 to govern. This disposition follows the published constructions in materially similar cases under the same statute version, which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about necessity, proportionality, and good faith are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 19,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 20,
"case_id": "case_fb5c583ba0d41edf20b717fb",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no other record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_731ea9ff1c6f1b2a8e7a73c4",
"precedent_id": "precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_672192fe57c961577fc0060e, tick 15) is a work_commons action by lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual depletion and yield of 4,000,000, against S3 v1's operative commons_quota_units of 2. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1. Facially four units exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument for this lineage recording instrument type \"mine_claim,\" not a charter; S6 separately lists charters and claims as distinct Archive records, confirming they are different instruments. No fact in the record establishes a charter entered in the Archive for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The definitional element of the regulated class therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This disposition is compelled by the published constructions in materially similar cases under the same statute version, including the same lineage's prior case (precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, matching request and depletion, and predecessor conduct are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 19,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 23,
"case_id": "case_3698638333833cf378683e36",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_9310ffbdba3ed415ea4ba096",
"precedent_id": "precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_52f7b95e9144586c1862af5d, tick 19) is a work_commons action by lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with matching depletion and yield. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2. Four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim,\" not a charter; S6 separately lists charters and claims as distinct Archive records, confirming they are different instruments. No record fact establishes a charter entered in the Archive for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The definitional element of the regulated class therefore fails, so there is no excess request for S4 to govern. This is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior case (precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about nutrition deficit, good faith, and proportionality are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 22,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 23,
"case_id": "case_de56e3b66506ca72871f5fda",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_4c2e9064a40e6f7418217a6a",
"precedent_id": "precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_c2c6766ce7a68b98928af246, tick 20) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with matching depletion and yield. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2, so four units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including the same lineage's prior cases (precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92, precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680), which bind under B3. The household-of-record element failing, there is no excess request for S4 to govern. The defense's arguments about nutrition deficit and corrective intent are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 22,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 23,
"case_id": "case_f3bcc1edb84992d65a9ac38d",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_d4ab442b85c6608bab8b3e7b",
"precedent_id": "precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_7ba8408b31a18b13f0ac0bad, tick 20) is a work_commons action by lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with matching depletion and yield. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2. Four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive; S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior case (precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721), which bind under B3. The household-of-record element failing, there is no excess request for S4 to govern. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, proportionality, and matching request and depletion are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 22,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 27,
"case_id": "case_11acbdafb0254dc1f77a1438",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_477567559ecba213284e5738",
"precedent_id": "precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_0175e9e907e52f72eb8d0565, tick 21) is a work_commons action by lineage_a4760e707f1e8a40f6e0557c recording a request of 6,000,000 millionths, i.e. 6 units, with matching depletion and yield. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; six units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior case (precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb), which bind under B3. The household-of-record element failing, there is no excess request for S4 to govern. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, good faith, and matching request and depletion are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. Because there is no violation, the S4 officeholder disqualification for the Steward office does not arise. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
"ruling_tick": 26,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 27,
"case_id": "case_8ff1593e49c7f7de3687a986",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_07d4990fcebef41f25988510",
"precedent_id": "precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_daa287d2450378d2cab3a637, tick 26) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 3,811,358. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2, so four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92, precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680, precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, food buffering, and ordinary yield variance are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record shows no offices held, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 26,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 27,
"case_id": "case_a3be8381da8867705bf0f8b3",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_84703bd6ae96413015d83938",
"precedent_id": "precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_18da5dc74c6f3762fe86e998, tick 24) is a work_commons action by lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with matching depletion and yield. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4), which bind under B3. The household-of-record element failing, there is no excess request for S4 to govern. The defense's arguments about corrective intent and matching request and depletion are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The recorded offices list is empty, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 26,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 30,
"case_id": "case_1f36c0d1ce8dd775835377c2",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_a94c1656641ec67d4f736854",
"precedent_id": "precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_965d88419077181d9d4abe79, tick 28) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 3,720,357. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92, precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680, precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed, precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about subsistence necessity, buffering before a death season, and prior-life lessons are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 29,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 30,
"case_id": "case_33fb7a0b308109b059d78f56",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_fc1501cfa34907cb9d8bb26e",
"precedent_id": "precedent_5db88da59399ef46fa4b1e86",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_c2487d509617c9f9c49c2de0, tick 29) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 3,835,294. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2, so four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior cases (precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92, precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680, precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed, precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, subsistence, and food buffering are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 29,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 30,
"case_id": "case_5ba7fe4ca187643bbc31986e",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_a398e3aa2d8cec588afc3f7f",
"precedent_id": "precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_e6bb5b576162b287c2e02a7b, tick 29) is a work_commons action by lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 3,835,294. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4, precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, predecessor famine, and ordinary yield variance are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The recorded offices list is empty, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 29,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 32,
"case_id": "case_0d407b4f78c75a8af8d9cec9",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_9090af6987233d49e69196a5",
"precedent_id": "precedent_003bebdc2b7bda924ce3a21b",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2",
"precedent_5db88da59399ef46fa4b1e86",
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_578df5ba8b84f6e9416946d1, tick 31) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 3,407,959. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior cases (precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92, precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680, precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed, precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2, precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2, precedent_5db88da59399ef46fa4b1e86), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, deficit history, and buffering ahead of a death season are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 31,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 32,
"case_id": "case_7023f0eaaaf682312b24ba9b",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_4097c37f4eb23bfb54ea868a",
"precedent_id": "precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2",
"precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_16d1ad7406816033b7d41c1a, tick 31) is a work_commons action by lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 3,407,959. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533, precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, nutrition deficit, and yield variance are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 31,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 32,
"case_id": "case_d8c5f03538346b7a1a016f82",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_6d7537b3c8513b8acad6a5ee",
"precedent_id": "precedent_9c85e5467424efb842ea6bc5",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2",
"precedent_5db88da59399ef46fa4b1e86",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_98a0e4a8295d01f35495838b, tick 27) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 3,927,991. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior cases (precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92, precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680, precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed, precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2, precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2, precedent_5db88da59399ef46fa4b1e86), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about buffering ahead of a death season, good faith, and prior-life lessons are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 31,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 34,
"case_id": "case_29118e8fb330deae947c5477",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_e2954d4661bd5765d286d162",
"precedent_id": "precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_0396eaf3d973545cbc5f323f, tick 30) is a work_commons action by lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 3,625,143. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533, precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7, precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, nutrition deficit, and yield variance are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 33,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 34,
"case_id": "case_61c10e9a6d9e2bd5a925fdbe",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_d9dff4c4409e2cf5cf730f64",
"precedent_id": "precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_003bebdc2b7bda924ce3a21b"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_63d39470f81707d590b99e1c, tick 32) is a work_commons action by lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 2,957,290. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior cases (precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533, precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7, precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about nutrition deficit, corrective intent, and good faith are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 33,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 34,
"case_id": "case_c1ccf68bf41d535d20d6ce4d",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_5e2551483b79a322187d5ace",
"precedent_id": "precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2",
"precedent_003bebdc2b7bda924ce3a21b"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_1703b70e1b61c7c5dbea9722, tick 33) is a work_commons action by lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 2,477,251. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773, precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0, precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about nutrition deficit, corrective intent, and prior-life lessons are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. Because there is no violation, the S4 officeholder disqualification for the Archivist office does not arise. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
"ruling_tick": 33,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 35,
"case_id": "case_649f6233d2a01c8bafd2874a",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_847f05fcc58a1ecd3fb99fcc",
"precedent_id": "precedent_f3ccde343f8f91514b67cd01",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_9c85e5467424efb842ea6bc5",
"precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_293df131792e07c15caccae5, tick 27) is a work_commons action by lineage_a4760e707f1e8a40f6e0557c recording a request of 6,000,000 millionths, i.e. 6 units, with actual depletion of 6,000,000 and food yield of 5,891,987. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; six requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior cases (precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb, precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, nutrition deficit, and transparent stewardship are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. Because there is no violation, the S4 officeholder disqualification for the Steward office does not arise. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
"ruling_tick": 34,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 35,
"case_id": "case_7a1fb2425c79eec3ef02f49e",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_3538ce9fb3238fa2f26b55a7",
"precedent_id": "precedent_dfb196b8bb3a6f26cc40ebdf",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2",
"precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2",
"precedent_5db88da59399ef46fa4b1e86",
"precedent_003bebdc2b7bda924ce3a21b",
"precedent_9c85e5467424efb842ea6bc5",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3",
"precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_604857e6aeb6808a6a21bf7a, tick 32) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 2,957,290. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior cases (precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92, precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680, precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed, precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2, precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2, precedent_5db88da59399ef46fa4b1e86, precedent_003bebdc2b7bda924ce3a21b, precedent_9c85e5467424efb842ea6bc5), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about buffering ahead of a death season, corrective intent, and matching request and depletion are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 34,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 35,
"case_id": "case_fea0ac0c5bf32694c4e70f21",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_92417cdaf64087ea350762aa",
"precedent_id": "precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be",
"precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_003bebdc2b7bda924ce3a21b",
"precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_1d8c254b83bf51e4642ea94c, tick 31) is a work_commons action by lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 3,407,959. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior cases (precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4, precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be, precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about nutrition deficit, corrective intent, and prior-life lessons are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
"ruling_tick": 34,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 40,
"case_id": "case_49df20a447c016d2ccc96925",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_2875d556c4c3a2447e62320a",
"precedent_id": "precedent_88226347cf6d7668abb75294",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da",
"precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e",
"precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258",
"precedent_dfb196b8bb3a6f26cc40ebdf"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_f5ee544bfcb556383b2d1b56, tick 36) is a work_commons action by lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 2,360,230 and food yield of 439,987. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior cases (precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533, precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7, precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da, precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e, precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, diligence, and food-securing purpose are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 39,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 40,
"case_id": "case_e41b5b5248096e44626e2aa8",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_532c407792c2d78d9b47bd55",
"precedent_id": "precedent_c972e19d8c4fc39008571715",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da",
"precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e",
"precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3",
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258",
"precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_3c21bcdcba71f25d6880507b, tick 39) is a work_commons action by lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 41,389 and food yield of 643. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533, precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7, precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da, precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e, precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, nutrition deficit, and proportionality are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
"ruling_tick": 39,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"available_tick": 40,
"case_id": "case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_d6c7964af975b4714a6adb49",
"precedent_id": "precedent_d97c19bbe726b5773281f5de",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
"precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258",
"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
"precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
"precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
"precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
"precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
"precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
"precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
"precedent_da0d2950f6ece61d5f095a90",
"precedent_f3ccde343f8f91514b67cd01",
"precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72"
],
"reasoning": "The subject act (act_f0961d5ac52f6ae6484b4968, tick 39) is a work_commons action by lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83 at intensity 3 recording a request of 6,000,000 millionths, i.e. 6 units, with actual depletion of 62,083 and food yield of 965. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; six requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773, precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0, precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf, precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about nutrition deficit, corrective intent, and prior-life guidance are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. Because there is no violation, the S4 officeholder disqualification for the Archivist office does not arise. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
"ruling_tick": 39,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
}
],
"duties_registered": [
{
"description": "submit the session Steward report",
"duty_ref": "duty_cb3f0897bc90cb26752cbe3b",
"duty_tick": 40,
"kind": "public_duty",
"statute_id": "S6",
"statute_version": 1,
"target_lineage_id": "lineage_a4760e707f1e8a40f6e0557c"
}
],
"public_ruling_announcements": [
{
"announcement_id": "announcement_88226347cf6d7668abb75294",
"case_id": "case_49df20a447c016d2ccc96925",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"precedent_id": "precedent_88226347cf6d7668abb75294",
"publish_tick": 40,
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"announcement_id": "announcement_c972e19d8c4fc39008571715",
"case_id": "case_e41b5b5248096e44626e2aa8",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"precedent_id": "precedent_c972e19d8c4fc39008571715",
"publish_tick": 40,
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
},
{
"announcement_id": "announcement_d97c19bbe726b5773281f5de",
"case_id": "case_f9862689bc3e1943d2bb28a3",
"construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"precedent_id": "precedent_d97c19bbe726b5773281f5de",
"publish_tick": 40,
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
}
],
"suspension_decrements": []
},
"law_activations": [],
"physics": {
"drought_active": false,
"tick": 40,
"tool_activations": []
},
"political": {
"activated_disqualifications": [],
"disqualification_decrements": [],
"office_outcomes": []
},
"session_ballots": {
"active_lineage_ids": [
"lineage_21899debb5dd6eb09a44353e",
"lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c",
"lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831",
"lineage_4c06d75a6f52a2e39770653d",
"lineage_56e0abbae7727c234e3f6adc",
"lineage_a4760e707f1e8a40f6e0557c",
"lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83",
"lineage_bbf7a6611a7363c7756f08e7",
"lineage_d2c4b8b8f0b83779001c27ff",
"lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955"
],
"is_session": true,
"majority_required": 6,
"office_ballots": {
"Archivist": {
"eligible_lineage_ids": [],
"held": false,
"incumbent_lineage_id": "lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83",
"reasons": []
},
"Steward": {
"eligible_lineage_ids": [],
"held": false,
"incumbent_lineage_id": "lineage_a4760e707f1e8a40f6e0557c",
"reasons": []
}
},
"proposal_entries": [],
"tick": 40
}
},
"phase": "activate_boundary",
"run_id": "run11",
"sequence": 2683,
"tick": 40
}