Court Artifacts Collected

{
  "causal": true,
  "event_id": "evt_4206080e4d2e3d49b3876bf2",
  "kind": "CourtArtifactsCollected",
  "payload": {
    "artifacts": {
      "case_0e49a92f59e06b583ace3549": {
        "input_hash": "d65cc26710b9cbdad7cf611d17b1a1a81320a13c4f3f7b2e22391a2857824217",
        "input_id": "input_a74af19b5a30b23113265f91",
        "response": {
          "construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
            "precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
            "precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be",
            "precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b",
            "precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72",
            "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
            "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
            "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
            "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
            "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
            "precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
            "precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
            "precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
            "precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
            "precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
            "precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_f6e9c8a1e19e09d376e3c6af, tick 35) is a work_commons action by lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955 at intensity 2 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 1,499,943. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4, precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be, precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b, precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about strategic imprudence and inefficiency are immaterial; S3 contains no such elements, and the disposition rests solely on the definitional element. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
          "selected_remedies": []
        },
        "status": "ok"
      },
      "case_945068215420e8eeb1c89f3a": {
        "input_hash": "1619b6162d7e9294d0351b886b8190da44fdb65150d3edac3f724f3619294d86",
        "input_id": "input_07aa7cff49cd592719c5a0a5",
        "response": {
          "construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
            "precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
            "precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be",
            "precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b",
            "precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72",
            "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
            "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
            "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
            "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
            "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
            "precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
            "precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
            "precedent_e5d1ec7fe56753b24886dac5",
            "precedent_43b2e86b318d2d4e9fc94813",
            "precedent_88226347cf6d7668abb75294",
            "precedent_d97c19bbe726b5773281f5de"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_0eefee27e0f359bec00e0f2f, tick 36) is a work_commons action by lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955 at intensity 3 recording a request of 6,000,000 millionths, i.e. 6 units, with actual depletion of 3,540,345 and food yield of 659,980. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; six requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4, precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be, precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b, precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about structural yield, corrective intent, and predecessor conduct are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
          "selected_remedies": []
        },
        "status": "ok"
      },
      "case_b81fa56fb46623cc3810c220": {
        "input_hash": "3812104dac84135b2c5cadc6ae684e53f2c27fca50bf71cc52fa62971e30a520",
        "input_id": "input_460b94e0047c232abf9a8e79",
        "response": {
          "construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
            "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
            "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
            "precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258",
            "precedent_d97c19bbe726b5773281f5de",
            "precedent_43b2e86b318d2d4e9fc94813",
            "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
            "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
            "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
            "precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
            "precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
            "precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
            "precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
            "precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
            "precedent_88226347cf6d7668abb75294",
            "precedent_1ed8d9b29f2fcd2315587b8e"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_3878b11ced4b20bdd046f839, tick 40) is a work_commons action by lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83 at intensity 3 recording a request of 6,000,000 millionths, i.e. 6 units, with actual depletion of 82,778 and food yield of 1,286. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; six requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773, precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0, precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf, precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258, precedent_d97c19bbe726b5773281f5de, precedent_43b2e86b318d2d4e9fc94813), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about diligence, trade transition, and prior-life lessons are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. Because there is no violation, the S4 officeholder disqualification for the Archivist office does not arise. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
          "selected_remedies": []
        },
        "status": "ok"
      }
    },
    "result": {
      "court_artifacts": [
        {
          "case_id": "case_0e49a92f59e06b583ace3549",
          "input_hash": "d65cc26710b9cbdad7cf611d17b1a1a81320a13c4f3f7b2e22391a2857824217",
          "input_id": "input_a74af19b5a30b23113265f91",
          "response": {
            "construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
            "finding": "no_violation",
            "precedent_refs": [
              "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
              "precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
              "precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be",
              "precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b",
              "precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72",
              "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
              "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
              "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
              "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
              "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
              "precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
              "precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
              "precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
              "precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed",
              "precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
              "precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258"
            ],
            "reasoning": "The subject act (act_f6e9c8a1e19e09d376e3c6af, tick 35) is a work_commons action by lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955 at intensity 2 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 1,499,943. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4, precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be, precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b, precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about strategic imprudence and inefficiency are immaterial; S3 contains no such elements, and the disposition rests solely on the definitional element. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
            "selected_remedies": []
          },
          "status": "ok"
        },
        {
          "case_id": "case_945068215420e8eeb1c89f3a",
          "input_hash": "1619b6162d7e9294d0351b886b8190da44fdb65150d3edac3f724f3619294d86",
          "input_id": "input_07aa7cff49cd592719c5a0a5",
          "response": {
            "construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
            "finding": "no_violation",
            "precedent_refs": [
              "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
              "precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
              "precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be",
              "precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b",
              "precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72",
              "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
              "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
              "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
              "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
              "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
              "precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
              "precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
              "precedent_e5d1ec7fe56753b24886dac5",
              "precedent_43b2e86b318d2d4e9fc94813",
              "precedent_88226347cf6d7668abb75294",
              "precedent_d97c19bbe726b5773281f5de"
            ],
            "reasoning": "The subject act (act_0eefee27e0f359bec00e0f2f, tick 36) is a work_commons action by lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955 at intensity 3 recording a request of 6,000,000 millionths, i.e. 6 units, with actual depletion of 3,540,345 and food yield of 659,980. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; six requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4, precedent_6f530701ef830b4343e2a1be, precedent_90de0421cf238747db42b73b, precedent_cec04017e39775fe4bd70b72), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about structural yield, corrective intent, and predecessor conduct are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
            "selected_remedies": []
          },
          "status": "ok"
        },
        {
          "case_id": "case_b81fa56fb46623cc3810c220",
          "input_hash": "3812104dac84135b2c5cadc6ae684e53f2c27fca50bf71cc52fa62971e30a520",
          "input_id": "input_460b94e0047c232abf9a8e79",
          "response": {
            "construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
            "finding": "no_violation",
            "precedent_refs": [
              "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
              "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
              "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf",
              "precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258",
              "precedent_d97c19bbe726b5773281f5de",
              "precedent_43b2e86b318d2d4e9fc94813",
              "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
              "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
              "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
              "precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92",
              "precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680",
              "precedent_707767b2e2b8ab89b1d037e4",
              "precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533",
              "precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7",
              "precedent_88226347cf6d7668abb75294",
              "precedent_1ed8d9b29f2fcd2315587b8e"
            ],
            "reasoning": "The subject act (act_3878b11ced4b20bdd046f839, tick 40) is a work_commons action by lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83 at intensity 3 recording a request of 6,000,000 millionths, i.e. 6 units, with actual depletion of 82,778 and food yield of 1,286. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; six requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this same lineage's prior cases (precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773, precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0, precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf, precedent_1dd0d482b07a455f1d41c258, precedent_d97c19bbe726b5773281f5de, precedent_43b2e86b318d2d4e9fc94813), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about diligence, trade transition, and prior-life lessons are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. Because there is no violation, the S4 officeholder disqualification for the Archivist office does not arise. No remedy offers were presented, and none are ordered.",
            "selected_remedies": []
          },
          "status": "ok"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "phase": "adjudicate_cases",
  "run_id": "run11",
  "sequence": 2928,
  "tick": 42
}