Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_023c2a8986…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_8229785cd26c524db9b4c1f1Opened at tick 10 concerning Action act_b7416672ee… attributed to Lineage 6.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_66058de361…
- Subject
- Action act_b7416672ee… at tick 10
- Target
- Lineage 6
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject action itself is dispositive: at tick 10 I performed work_commons, intensity 2, yielding 4,000,000 food—precisely the prioritization of food acquisition over private metal extraction that sound stewardship demands. The journal record for ticks 7–9 shows I anticipated the deficit, shifted to commons labor for a food buffer, and offered open metal-food trades while monitoring the colony-wide shortage as Archivist. There is no evidence in this record of hoarding, of continued pure metal extraction while ignoring nutrition, or of institutional inaction—rather the record shows escalating, proactive food production culminating in this very act. Whatever failure occurred in a prior life's tenure is not the conduct charged here; the subject act and surrounding journal entries demonstrate compliance with the lesson, not violation of it. Any statute aimed at punishing passive accumulation during a nutrition deficit cannot properly attach to an action that is itself the corrective food-producing measure. I ask that the charge be measured against this specific tick-10 conduct alone, which affirmatively addressed the deficit rather than compounding it.”
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act is a tick-10 work_commons action at intensity 2 with a recorded request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, against S3 v1's operative quota of 2 units. On its face the request exceeds two units. But S3 as written imposes the quota only on 'a household of record,' and defines that term as 'a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.' The only archive evidence in this record is the lineage instrument entry for lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83, which records instrument 'mine_claim' entered in the Archive. A mine_claim is not a charter; S6 separately distinguishes charters from claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming the two instruments are distinct. No fact in the record establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The lineage is therefore not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an 'applicable limit' as to it, and there is no excess request for S4 to govern. Applying the text as written under the versions effective at tick 10 (B3), the charge fails. The defense's stewardship and prior-life arguments are not reached; the outcome rests on the definitional scope of S3. Because there is no violation, the S4 officeholder disqualification for the Archivist office does not arise, and no remedy is available (no remedy offers were made in any event).
Matter is not case
matter_66058de361… deduplicated legal question
case_8229785cd2… adjudication record
precedent_023c2a8986… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.