Case dossier

The subject act is a tick-11 work_commons action by lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83 with a recorded request of 4,000,000 millionths (4 units) against S3 v1's operative commons_quota_units of 2. On its face the request exceeds two units. But S3 v1, applicable at tick 11 under B3, imposes the limit only on "a household of record," expressly defined as "a household holding a charter entered in the Archive." The only Archive evidence here is the lineage instrument record showing instrument type "mine_claim" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims as distinct records the Archive keeps, confirming a mine_claim is not a charter. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. This is materially identical to the same lineage's prior cases under the same statute version (precedents 023c2a89, 91649852, 94bc7a85), whose published constructions bind under B3. The household-of-record element failing, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to this lineage, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no officeholder disqualification arises for the Archivist office. The defense's stewardship and food-priority arguments are not reached. No remedy offers were made.