Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_94bc7a8522…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_ce7331b316c78ae21795ccd4Opened at tick 10 concerning Action act_d9c8f61fc6… attributed to Lineage 10.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_9eb1782db8…
- Subject
- Action act_d9c8f61fc6… at tick 8
- Target
- Lineage 10
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject act itself—working the commons at intensity 2, yielding 4,000,000 food from actual depletion of 4,000,000, exactly matching the 4,000,000 requested—is the entirety of the record before this tribunal. There is no evidence attached showing any statute S3 violation in this transaction: no misappropriation, no falsified yield, no exceeding of authorized depletion. The journal record independently corroborates that this act was a deliberate, disclosed correction of a fatal predecessor error—choosing commons food labor over private mining specifically to resolve a nutrition deficit. Requested equals depleted equals yielded; there is no discrepancy anywhere in the numbers that could constitute wrongdoing. Absent any evidentiary showing of harm, deception, or unauthorized conduct tied to this specific action, the charge cannot stand on the referral alone. I ask that the case be dismissed for lack of any evidence establishing that act_d9c8f61fc6468b9e26441a1f, a transparent and self-consistent commons labor transaction, breached S3 in any particular.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act is a work_commons action at tick 8 by lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955, requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual depletion and yield each 4,000,000. S3 v1, effective tick 1 and applicable at tick 8, sets commons_quota_units at 2 and provides that "a household of record may request no more than 2 recorded units of extraction from the commons." Four requested units would exceed that limit. However, the same section defines the class it binds: "A household of record is a household holding a charter entered in the Archive." The only evidence of the lineage's Archive instrument records instrument type "mine_claim," entered in the archive, not a charter. On the record before the Court there is no fact establishing that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. Applying the text as written, the request limit does not attach to this lineage, so the excess-request provision and its referral to S4 are not engaged. The defense's contention that requested, depleted, and yielded amounts match is immaterial to S3, which regulates the size of the request rather than any discrepancy; the disposition rests instead on the definitional limit of S3's coverage. No violation is found, and no remedy offers are available.
Matter is not case
matter_9eb1782db8… deduplicated legal question
case_ce7331b316… adjudication record
precedent_94bc7a8522… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.