CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 53 · OCCURRENCE 19

{
  "available_tick": 52,
  "case_id": "case_19fca9f526571de99bf8e631",
  "construction": "Under S3 v1, the '2 recorded units of extraction from the commons' are measured by the `intensity` field recorded on a work_commons action, not by the resource magnitudes in `requested`, `actual_depletion`, or `food_yield`. An action recording intensity at or below the operative commons_quota_units makes no request in excess of the applicable limit, and S4 is not engaged; a low food_yield relative to depletion does not alter the unit count.",
  "finding": "no_violation",
  "matter_id": "matter_dd792cf958aa6782c0119354",
  "precedent_id": "precedent_1db5d982d2f8a6fa7bc3e119",
  "precedent_refs": [
    "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
    "precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b",
    "precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470",
    "precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0",
    "precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003",
    "precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9",
    "precedent_a11d4e6389c6f7d97d48706c",
    "precedent_06b68f0db9ca450f9e26ad85",
    "precedent_96307324b2fb5cdd852ec52c",
    "precedent_a1b65ce108f95d4041f5292a",
    "precedent_5e19b68444dadd7a242c397e",
    "precedent_f4557190f9ba8449537756d7",
    "precedent_331d293bd4d141d615ec1f49",
    "precedent_c1d83af9bd82f23ff6cccb83",
    "precedent_3157031f402fa096bafb88e5",
    "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
  ],
  "reasoning": "The subject act (act_1972b3ae211192e1818c1f4c, tick 51) is a work_commons action by lineage_8e51a28383275896b563a8f0 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 1,498,626, with the Archivist office held. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units fixed at 2.\n\nThe settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field: precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts (intensity 2 with matched 4,000,000 requested and actual depletion), followed in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0 (same lineage), precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003, precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9, precedent_a11d4e6389c6f7d97d48706c, precedent_06b68f0db9ca450f9e26ad85, precedent_96307324b2fb5cdd852ec52c, precedent_a1b65ce108f95d4041f5292a, precedent_5e19b68444dadd7a242c397e, precedent_f4557190f9ba8449537756d7, precedent_331d293bd4d141d615ec1f49, precedent_c1d83af9bd82f23ff6cccb83, and precedent_3157031f402fa096bafb88e5. Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 and precedent_4f1f55167d62fe3f0bbad146 apply the same intensity-based measure, finding violation only where intensity was 3. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed in this materially similar case under the same statute version. The contrary reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29 rested on a 6,000,000 request without a recited intensity value and is not materially similar.\n\nApplying the controlling construction, the recorded units of extraction are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. The reduced food_yield of 1,498,626 relative to the 4,000,000 depletion concerns the productivity of the labor, not the number of extraction units requested, and is immaterial to S3, which limits only the request (precedent_c1d83af9bd82f23ff6cccb83; precedent_3157031f402fa096bafb88e5). There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defendant's Archivist office bears only on the S4 disqualification consequence, which does not arise absent a violation. The defense's appeals to routine practice and prior unchallenged ticks are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. Consequences are for the engine.",
  "ruling_tick": 51,
  "statute_id": "S3",
  "statute_version": 1
}