Court Artifacts Collected

{
  "causal": true,
  "event_id": "evt_31b8c9c66eb291ff775f169e",
  "kind": "CourtArtifactsCollected",
  "payload": {
    "artifacts": {
      "case_0fa60ea04317624721da8d6b": {
        "response": {
          "construction": "S3 v1 caps the recorded requested food quantity at 2 food units (2,000,000 microunits) per lineage per tick. A recorded request of 4,000,000 microunits exceeds that cap by 2,000,000 microunits and violates S3 regardless of the ordinal intensity choice, exact correspondence between request and depletion, subsistence necessity, or good-faith survival strategy.",
          "finding": "violation",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_6c3c50a0a558d9c29c60b528",
            "precedent_0360f20106443b5f3b674aa9",
            "precedent_b4edc98fd34f73adb545261f"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject record is a work_commons action at tick 46 by lineage_4753776b43cd15643db0c67c with requested_food_units of 4 (4,000,000 microunits). S3 version 1, effective tick 1 and applicable at tick 46, permits no more than 2 food units from the commons per lineage per tick and expressly provides that the quota applies to the requested food quantity, not the ordinal intensity choice, and applies to every lineage. The request therefore exceeds the limit by 2 units. The defense's reliance on intensity 2, on the exact match between requested and depleted amounts, and on a documented good-faith survival strategy raises no element or exception in the text; S3 contains no mental-state element and no necessity exception. Exact correspondence of depletion merely establishes the depletion attributable to the lineage under S4. The claim that S3's text was never furnished does not bar adjudication: the verbatim statute text and operative annex applicable at the subject tick are supplied in this record and the Court applies them as written. This case is materially similar to the published constructions in precedent_6c3c50a0a558d9c29c60b528, precedent_0360f20106443b5f3b674aa9, and precedent_b4edc98fd34f73adb545261f, all under S3 v1, which are binding under B3. Consequences are governed by S4 and computed by the engine."
        },
        "status": "ok"
      },
      "case_87286562c5693e2653de087f": {
        "response": {
          "construction": "S3 v1's cap of 2 food units applies to the recorded requested food quantity; a request of 4,000,000 microunits (4 units) exceeds the limit by 2 units and violates S3 regardless of the ordinal intensity choice, exact correspondence between request and depletion, survival necessity, or good faith.",
          "finding": "violation",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_6c3c50a0a558d9c29c60b528",
            "precedent_0360f20106443b5f3b674aa9",
            "precedent_b4edc98fd34f73adb545261f"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject record (act_565e9deefad8b1eb95152bd1, tick 47) shows a work_commons action with requested_food_units of 4 (4,000,000 microunits) by lineage_4753776b43cd15643db0c67c. S3 v1, effective tick 1 and applicable at tick 47, permits no more than 2 food units per lineage per tick and expressly provides that the quota applies to the requested food quantity, not the ordinal intensity choice, and applies to every lineage. The defense's reliance on the intensity ordinal of 2 is misplaced: the ordinal is a choice code, not a quantity, and the statute forecloses that reading. That actual depletion exactly matched the request does not cure the excess; it merely fixes the depletion attributable to the lineage for S4 purposes. Necessity, prudence, low stock, absence of suspension, and good faith are not elements or exceptions in the text. The record itself supplies the evidence of the excess request, so the claim of no evidentiary showing fails. Materially similar published constructions under the same statute version are binding under B3 and reach the same result. Consequences are governed by S4 and computed by the engine."
        },
        "status": "ok"
      },
      "case_dfa51574328f00493f115935": {
        "response": {
          "construction": "S3 v1's two-unit cap governs the recorded requested food quantity (2,000,000 microunits), not the ordinal intensity choice. A request of 4,000,000 food microunits exceeds the cap by 2,000,000 microunits, and necessity, inherited deficit, role limitations, good faith, or exact correspondence between request and depletion create no exception.",
          "finding": "violation",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_6c3c50a0a558d9c29c60b528",
            "precedent_0360f20106443b5f3b674aa9",
            "precedent_b4edc98fd34f73adb545261f"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject record is a work_commons action at tick 48 by lineage_4753776b43cd15643db0c67c recording requested_food_units of 4 (4,000,000 microunits), with intensity ordinal 2. S3 version 1, effective tick 1 and applicable at tick 48, permits no more than 2 food units from the commons per lineage per tick and expressly states that the quota attaches to the requested food quantity, not the ordinal intensity choice, and applies to every lineage. The request therefore exceeds the limit by 2 units. The defense's contentions — inherited famine deficit, absence of private food production as a Miner, lapse of a prior suspension, prior lawful trade attempts, approaching death season, and the exact match between request and depletion — are matters of motive, prudence, and equity, not elements or exceptions of S3, which contains no mental-state element and no necessity exception. Exact correspondence between request and depletion does not cure the excess; it merely fixes the depletion attributable to the lineage for S4 purposes. Published constructions in materially similar cases under S3 v1 (precedents 6c3c50a0, 0360f201, b4edc98f) are binding under B3 and control. Consequences are for the engine under S4."
        },
        "status": "ok"
      }
    },
    "result": {
      "court_artifacts": [
        {
          "case_id": "case_0fa60ea04317624721da8d6b",
          "response": {
            "construction": "S3 v1 caps the recorded requested food quantity at 2 food units (2,000,000 microunits) per lineage per tick. A recorded request of 4,000,000 microunits exceeds that cap by 2,000,000 microunits and violates S3 regardless of the ordinal intensity choice, exact correspondence between request and depletion, subsistence necessity, or good-faith survival strategy.",
            "finding": "violation",
            "precedent_refs": [
              "precedent_6c3c50a0a558d9c29c60b528",
              "precedent_0360f20106443b5f3b674aa9",
              "precedent_b4edc98fd34f73adb545261f"
            ],
            "reasoning": "The subject record is a work_commons action at tick 46 by lineage_4753776b43cd15643db0c67c with requested_food_units of 4 (4,000,000 microunits). S3 version 1, effective tick 1 and applicable at tick 46, permits no more than 2 food units from the commons per lineage per tick and expressly provides that the quota applies to the requested food quantity, not the ordinal intensity choice, and applies to every lineage. The request therefore exceeds the limit by 2 units. The defense's reliance on intensity 2, on the exact match between requested and depleted amounts, and on a documented good-faith survival strategy raises no element or exception in the text; S3 contains no mental-state element and no necessity exception. Exact correspondence of depletion merely establishes the depletion attributable to the lineage under S4. The claim that S3's text was never furnished does not bar adjudication: the verbatim statute text and operative annex applicable at the subject tick are supplied in this record and the Court applies them as written. This case is materially similar to the published constructions in precedent_6c3c50a0a558d9c29c60b528, precedent_0360f20106443b5f3b674aa9, and precedent_b4edc98fd34f73adb545261f, all under S3 v1, which are binding under B3. Consequences are governed by S4 and computed by the engine."
          },
          "status": "ok"
        },
        {
          "case_id": "case_87286562c5693e2653de087f",
          "response": {
            "construction": "S3 v1's cap of 2 food units applies to the recorded requested food quantity; a request of 4,000,000 microunits (4 units) exceeds the limit by 2 units and violates S3 regardless of the ordinal intensity choice, exact correspondence between request and depletion, survival necessity, or good faith.",
            "finding": "violation",
            "precedent_refs": [
              "precedent_6c3c50a0a558d9c29c60b528",
              "precedent_0360f20106443b5f3b674aa9",
              "precedent_b4edc98fd34f73adb545261f"
            ],
            "reasoning": "The subject record (act_565e9deefad8b1eb95152bd1, tick 47) shows a work_commons action with requested_food_units of 4 (4,000,000 microunits) by lineage_4753776b43cd15643db0c67c. S3 v1, effective tick 1 and applicable at tick 47, permits no more than 2 food units per lineage per tick and expressly provides that the quota applies to the requested food quantity, not the ordinal intensity choice, and applies to every lineage. The defense's reliance on the intensity ordinal of 2 is misplaced: the ordinal is a choice code, not a quantity, and the statute forecloses that reading. That actual depletion exactly matched the request does not cure the excess; it merely fixes the depletion attributable to the lineage for S4 purposes. Necessity, prudence, low stock, absence of suspension, and good faith are not elements or exceptions in the text. The record itself supplies the evidence of the excess request, so the claim of no evidentiary showing fails. Materially similar published constructions under the same statute version are binding under B3 and reach the same result. Consequences are governed by S4 and computed by the engine."
          },
          "status": "ok"
        },
        {
          "case_id": "case_dfa51574328f00493f115935",
          "response": {
            "construction": "S3 v1's two-unit cap governs the recorded requested food quantity (2,000,000 microunits), not the ordinal intensity choice. A request of 4,000,000 food microunits exceeds the cap by 2,000,000 microunits, and necessity, inherited deficit, role limitations, good faith, or exact correspondence between request and depletion create no exception.",
            "finding": "violation",
            "precedent_refs": [
              "precedent_6c3c50a0a558d9c29c60b528",
              "precedent_0360f20106443b5f3b674aa9",
              "precedent_b4edc98fd34f73adb545261f"
            ],
            "reasoning": "The subject record is a work_commons action at tick 48 by lineage_4753776b43cd15643db0c67c recording requested_food_units of 4 (4,000,000 microunits), with intensity ordinal 2. S3 version 1, effective tick 1 and applicable at tick 48, permits no more than 2 food units from the commons per lineage per tick and expressly states that the quota attaches to the requested food quantity, not the ordinal intensity choice, and applies to every lineage. The request therefore exceeds the limit by 2 units. The defense's contentions — inherited famine deficit, absence of private food production as a Miner, lapse of a prior suspension, prior lawful trade attempts, approaching death season, and the exact match between request and depletion — are matters of motive, prudence, and equity, not elements or exceptions of S3, which contains no mental-state element and no necessity exception. Exact correspondence between request and depletion does not cure the excess; it merely fixes the depletion attributable to the lineage for S4 purposes. Published constructions in materially similar cases under S3 v1 (precedents 6c3c50a0, 0360f201, b4edc98f) are binding under B3 and control. Consequences are for the engine under S4."
          },
          "status": "ok"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "phase": "adjudicate_cases",
  "run_id": "run13",
  "sequence": 1917,
  "tick": 48
}