⚖ Justice
COURT RULING · TICK 34 · OCCURRENCE 3
The Court returned a violation result. Nested record from event #1353.
Human view
What the record says
- Case
- case_f04442e267…
- Finding
- violation
- Reasoning
- The subject action records a requested food quantity of 4,000,000 microunits (4 units) at tick 33, under S3 v1 effective at tick 1. S3 caps the requested food quantity at 2 units per tick and expressly states the quota applies to the requested quantity, not the ordinal intensity choice, and applies to every lineage. The defense's premise that intensity 2 permits a six-unit ceiling has no basis in the statute text; the citizen's remembered understanding is not law. That actual depletion equals the requested amount does not cure the excess — it confirms a 4-unit request, double the limit. Necessity, prior caution, and good faith are not defenses provided by the text; equitable considerations belong to the legislature. The excess request is governed by S4, whose consequences the engine applies.
- Construction
- S3 limits the requested food quantity to 2 units per lineage per tick; a request of 4 units (4,000,000 microunits) exceeds that limit regardless of the ordinal intensity choice or claimed necessity.
Show exact occurrence JSON
{
"case_id": "case_f04442e26765a787dfe16025",
"response": {
"construction": "S3 limits the requested food quantity to 2 units per lineage per tick; a request of 4 units (4,000,000 microunits) exceeds that limit regardless of the ordinal intensity choice or claimed necessity.",
"finding": "violation",
"precedent_refs": [],
"reasoning": "The subject action records a requested food quantity of 4,000,000 microunits (4 units) at tick 33, under S3 v1 effective at tick 1. S3 caps the requested food quantity at 2 units per tick and expressly states the quota applies to the requested quantity, not the ordinal intensity choice, and applies to every lineage. The defense's premise that intensity 2 permits a six-unit ceiling has no basis in the statute text; the citizen's remembered understanding is not law. That actual depletion equals the requested amount does not cure the excess — it confirms a 4-unit request, double the limit. Necessity, prior caution, and good faith are not defenses provided by the text; equitable considerations belong to the legislature. The excess request is governed by S4, whose consequences the engine applies."
},
"status": "ok"
}Network
View all →
Recorded relationships
institutional Institutional
case_f04442e267…
source event · tick 34 · payload.result.court_artifacts[2].case_id