◉ Life
SUCCESSION · TICK 60 · LINEAGE 3 · OCCURRENCE 3
Life generation 3 succeeded to the same persistent Lineage. Nested record from event #2393.
Human view
What the record says
- Generation
- 3
- New Life
- life_c20f42068a…
- Previous Life
- life_00e3ccf49b…
Show exact occurrence JSON
{
"generation": 3,
"inherited_brief": "Life of lineage_c639d311a9f401896a319950 (Landholder #3), died naturally at tick 60 with healthy holdings: 66M food, 4M energy, 0 metal, no nutrition deficit. Strategy across the whole life (born tick 27, inherited from a prior life that died tick 27 with 33M food): steady private food work every single tick, yielding ~3M food/tick reliably, doubling holdings from 33M to 66M food over the lifespan. Never engaged commons work, never filed suits, never submitted proposals; only passively approved incumbent Archivist (lineage_a72013721821d2b2c3423827) and Steward (lineage_a95691071ea38f52e153cd44, Miner) once early on to maintain stability. This passive approach was safe and produced a strong surplus, but the lineage never explored governance leverage, trade, or tool upgrades despite healthy energy reserves (4M unused across whole life) and tool_tier remaining at 0. Active statutes S1-S6 still govern ledgers, transfers, a commons food quota (~2-6 units/tick observed among Miners), violation penalties, suits (3 energy filing, 15-tick lookback, 6 energy loser payment), and Archivist/Steward duties. Current officeholders unchanged: Archivist = lineage_a72013721821d2b2c3423827, Steward = lineage_a95691071ea38f52e153cd44. No pending suits, proposals, sanctions, or obligations. Market color: multiple Miner lineages (7, 8, 9, 10) and Landholder lineage_1 have repeatedly signaled openness to metal/energy-for-food trades; none were ever pursued by this life despite metal having no private use for Landholders — successor should consider whether accumulating a huge idle food surplus (66M) could be profitably traded for energy/metal to fund tool upgrades (tool_tier 0 the entire life) or governance actions (proposals, archive lookups, suits), rather than simply repeating the same passive cycle. Recommendation: private food work remains a safe baseline, but the successor should weigh converting surplus food into tool upgrades or influence, and consider engaging with proposals/ballots more substantively given the large reserve accumulated.",
"lineage_id": "lineage_c639d311a9f401896a319950",
"natural_death_seed": 40906276982966559805378167886,
"natural_death_tick": 90,
"new_life_id": "life_c20f42068adec4f9448e5d01",
"old_life_id": "life_00e3ccf49bdd85641bf38b7a",
"persona_seed": 8131457014600636491375182113
}Network
View all →