Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_0727fa3700…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_b505bdff6ddf0d763a4bb247Opened at tick 28 concerning Action act_c9d9b83699… attributed to Lineage 7.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_73f192b5a4…
- Subject
- Action act_c9d9b83699… at tick 27
- Target
- Lineage 7
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject action itself shows compliance, not violation: at tick 27, facing a renewed 2M deficit, I escalated commons food work to intensity 2, exactly as my inherited lesson demanded—matching action to actual need rather than repeating empty speech. The record shows a real depletion of 4,000,000 requested against genuine need, yielding 2,342,326 food, a substantive contribution toward closing the gap, not a token gesture. This single action cannot be judged in isolation from the surrounding pattern: I had already zeroed the deficit once through direct trades of hoarded metal, pivoted to metal work only once food was stable, and re-escalated the moment the deficit reappeared. I also pursued a structural fix—filing S8 twice to address the office-seating paralysis—when speeches alone weren't working, showing initiative beyond passive commentary. If the charge concerns the shortfall between requested and actual depletion, that gap reflects resource or systemic constraints on commons work capacity, not negligence or bad faith; I applied the maximum available intensity level and continued escalating in subsequent ticks (voting for S7 and S9) rather than repeating a failed routine. The evidentiary record confirms sustained, escalating, good-faith effort consistent with the very lesson I was bound to apply. No failure to act is shown here—only a citizen doing exactly what accountability required under real constraints.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject action (act_c9d9b836997b0ef05b179de8, tick 27) is a work_commons record showing requested 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 whole units, against S3 v1's operative commons_quota_units = 2, the version effective from tick 1 and applicable under B3. The defence's reliance on the intensity figure, on the shortfall between requested and yield, on need, and on its wider pattern of conduct would not answer the statute: S3 bounds the recorded request itself, depletion and yield bear only on the S4 restoration measure, and appeals to good faith, need, and constraint are matters of equity or policy for the legislature.
The case nonetheless turns on the threshold element. S3 v1 limits only "a household of record," expressly defined as "a household holding a charter entered in the Archive." The sole Archive evidence is the lineage-instrument record for lineage_6f13b9099633500937b0cbae, whose instrument type is "mine_claim," not a charter; S6 treats charters and claims as distinct Archive records, and I may not infer an unavailable charter record. Household-of-record status is therefore unproven, the two-unit limit did not bind this lineage at tick 27, and no S3 violation is established.
The published constructions in precedent_c6b253687471a4bfc09c84a5, precedent_5ea57ec9b97d848b9daa0a9d, precedent_53e09e3fca696206952f25c8, precedent_3f1618f16aa0b420767c242d, precedent_ddf226262182da24404ac376, precedent_188537a6b47e703b634d5879, precedent_26f3e820281f6d5a8e6ccc6e and precedent_587453cda6cf39bdd9ed070f address materially similar cases under the same statute version (a 4,000,000 work_commons request by a lineage whose only Archive instrument is a mine_claim) and hold the charter predicate an element; under B3 they are followed. To the extent precedent_d439460a0df60e2b0facc424 suggests a ceiling binds a non-chartered lineage, it did not construe the definitional element and finds no anchor in the text.
No office is recorded for the actor at the subject tick. remedy_offers is empty, so no discretionary remedy is selected.
Matter is not case
matter_73f192b5a4… deduplicated legal question
case_b505bdff6d… adjudication record
precedent_0727fa3700… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.