CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 36 · OCCURRENCE 3

{
  "available_tick": 15,
  "case_id": "case_efdcf9d89719fb1ddcaf2c60",
  "casebook_version": "0.2",
  "construction": "S3 limits only a \"household of record,\" which its own text defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The charter predicate is an essential element: absent a record showing a charter (as distinct from another Archive instrument such as a claim) entered in the Archive for the lineage, S3's per-tick extraction limit does not bind that lineage, and no S3 violation can be found regardless of the quantity requested.",
  "finding": "no_violation",
  "matter_id": "matter_b66eb56a06d77cb5032fe7b6",
  "precedent_id": "precedent_5ea57ec9b97d848b9daa0a9d",
  "precedent_refs": [],
  "reasoning": "The subject action records requested 4000000 millionths, i.e. 4 whole units of extraction from the commons in tick 11, against S3 v1's operative limit of 2 units. The defendant's argument that the recorded \"intensity 2\" is the regulated quantity is rejected: S3 regulates \"recorded units of extraction,\" and the action record's requested/actual_depletion fields state that quantity as 4 units, not the intensity field.\n\nHowever, S3 applies its limit only to a \"household of record,\" expressly defined as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only Archive evidence in this record is the lineage instrument for lineage_dd5f1cb2ca92af69e141e257, whose instrument type is \"mine_claim\" and not a charter. S6 distinguishes charters from claims among the Archive's records, so a recorded claim does not satisfy the charter predicate. Using only the facts supplied, and without inferring an unavailable charter record, the predicate for S3's application to this lineage is unestablished. The limit therefore did not bind the lineage at tick 11, and the tick-11 action is not an S3 violation.\n\nNo remedy offers were supplied, and none are selected.",
  "ruling_tick": 14,
  "selected_remedies": [],
  "statute_id": "S3",
  "statute_version": 1
}