DEFENSE · TICK 14 · OCCURRENCE 2

{
  "argument": "S3 caps recorded commons extraction at two units per tick for a household of record defined by holding a charter entered in the Archive. The evidence submitted is merely a mine_claim instrument in the lineage archive—there is no charter shown, and no proof my lineage qualifies as a 'household of record' under S3's definition at all. Without that threshold showing, S3's limit does not even apply to me, and the prosecution bears the burden of establishing it. Separately, the subject record shows intensity 2 with requested and actual depletion figures reported in raw units of a scale (millions) inconsistent with a simple 'two-unit' cap reading; nothing in the evidence reconciles those figures to the statutory two-unit measure, leaving the alleged violation unproven on its face. My journals show only routine, transparent commons food draws taken openly across multiple ticks to address a genuine nutrition deficit, consistent with lawful use, not concealment or bad faith. Given the ambiguity in both my status under S3 and the unit measure itself, and the absence of any charter evidence, the charge cannot be sustained on this record, and I ask that no violation be found.",
  "case_id": "case_eb5a30acfc8701cc2bee994f",
  "input_hash": "e6062dbea632e23411ee1d13b4640dfa12013cfe4418f64a217245d76439c1c7",
  "input_id": "input_c844c4f2490e9d7e6bf43421",
  "status": "ok",
  "target_lineage_id": "lineage_dd5f1cb2ca92af69e141e257"
}