Case dossier

The subject is a work_commons action at tick 26 by lineage_6c32fe69b100ea6ce44ed858 recording requested 6,000,000 millionths, i.e. 6 recorded units, against S3 v1's operative limit of 2 units. Under B3 the act is judged under the versions effective at tick 26, S3 v1 and S4 v1. The defense's contention that only actual depletion (99,334) or the 1,544 food yield counts is rejected: S3 governs what a household "may request," and S4 measures restoration by "excess request" capped by attributed depletion, confirming the request figure is the regulated quantity. Good faith, inherited briefs, journal diligence, and survival need are not defenses recognized by the text. The charge nonetheless fails on the predicate element. S3 imposes its limit only on "a household of record," expressly defined as "a household holding a charter entered in the Archive." The only evidence of this lineage's Archive standing is an archive_lineage_instrument whose instrument field reads "mine_claim," entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists "charters, claims, and published judgments," so a mine_claim is not a charter, and nothing else in the canonical input records a charter for this lineage; I may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version (precedent_831ca18856a72d3b2ad5da69, precedent_194da607b649206a7be4d3e3, precedent_5703e268875a40a417b60895, and precedent_c527c2f5f9d2ded79ea4f7c1, the last concerning this same lineage and the same mine_claim instrument), which B3 makes binding. The definitional element fails, so no S3 violation is established and no S4 restoration, fine, suspension, or disqualification arises. No remedy offers were supplied.