CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 30 · OCCURRENCE 2

{
  "available_tick": 21,
  "case_id": "case_50eb2e8575cac96e90d5fa58",
  "casebook_version": "0.2",
  "construction": "S3's extraction limit binds only a 'household of record,' which the statute defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the only archived lineage instrument in the record is an instrument of another type (here, a mine_claim), the lineage is not shown to be a household of record, and an extraction request in excess of the quota does not breach S3.",
  "finding": "no_violation",
  "matter_id": "matter_79e02ddbe050153725926424",
  "precedent_id": "precedent_194da607b649206a7be4d3e3",
  "precedent_refs": [],
  "reasoning": "The subject action is a work_commons act at tick 19 with requested 4000000 millionths, i.e. 4 whole units, which exceeds the S3 v1 operative quota of 2 recorded units. However, S3 as written imposes the per-tick limit only on 'a household of record,' expressly defined as 'a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.' The only evidence tendered is an archive lineage-instrument record for lineage_a8b89381c81ad1617535d5a9 whose instrument field reads 'mine_claim' — a claim, which S6 distinguishes from a charter ('The Archive records charters, claims, and published judgments'). Applying the text as written, the record does not establish that this lineage holds an archived charter, and no other fact in the canonical input supplies that element. Absent household-of-record status, the quota and its S4 consequences do not attach to the tick-19 request. Judged under the versions effective at tick 19 (S3 v1, S4 v1), the charge fails on an element of the statute, and no violation is found.",
  "ruling_tick": 20,
  "selected_remedies": [],
  "statute_id": "S3",
  "statute_version": 1
}