Court Raw Result

{
  "causal": false,
  "event_id": "evt_19b9b70b3b198332aabfe3d5",
  "kind": "CourtRawResult",
  "payload": {
    "call_id": "court-call_be35d7a9229cfba95cc42694",
    "case_id": "case_716fa91d3eac3785c002c783",
    "raw_response": {
      "content": [
        {
          "citations": null,
          "text": "{\"finding\":\"no_violation\",\"construction\":\"\",\"reasoning\":\"The subject is a work_commons action at tick 10 by lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1 requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 4,000,000 and food_yield 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 10 under B3 and caps requests at 2 recorded units, but only for a \\\"household of record,\\\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument type is \\\"mine_claim\\\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the record establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause of S3 referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published constructions in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 (and its followers precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca and precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d) construe the same statute version on materially identical facts — including precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2 involving this same lineage at tick 9 — and are binding under B3. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), no S3 violation is established. No remedy offers are available.\",\"precedent_refs\":[\"precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741\",\"precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2\",\"precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca\",\"precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d\"],\"selected_remedies\":[]}",
          "type": "text"
        }
      ],
      "model": "claude-opus-5",
      "request_id": "req_011CdcyJF3u9hs6eFs6w7rvF",
      "response_id": "msg_011CdcyJG4fscYMqwaUhX6pR",
      "stop_reason": "end_turn",
      "usage": {
        "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
        "cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
        "input_tokens": 9736,
        "output_tokens": 611
      }
    },
    "request_hash": "49447e47136b362a98e9a4764c0703b224a50e016ed2df928281e8f36de2e9cf"
  },
  "phase": "adjudicate_cases",
  "run_id": "run10",
  "sequence": 811,
  "tick": 13
}