References
precedent_359a54c467…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_7d01729c9f97137975b1ac92.response.precedent_refs[0]
Network
View all →
Recorded relationships
References
precedent_870055b2ba…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_7d01729c9f97137975b1ac92.response.precedent_refs[2]
References
precedent_5288f98442…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_7d01729c9f97137975b1ac92.response.precedent_refs[9]
institutional Institutional
case_b2389485bb…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_b2389485bbab3fa8579c5b31.binding.case_id
References
precedent_77e36d037f…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_b2389485bbab3fa8579c5b31.response.precedent_refs[7]
References
input_3e9fd39075…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_7d01729c9f97137975b1ac92.input_id
References
precedent_c43637134a…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_b2389485bbab3fa8579c5b31.response.precedent_refs[12]
References
precedent_11faa6afab…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_3748409226b48d45f717037d.binding.precedent_ids[15]
References
precedent_11faa6afab…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_7d01729c9f97137975b1ac92.binding.precedent_ids[15]
References
precedent_aa858f71f1…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_3748409226b48d45f717037d.binding.precedent_ids[10]
References
precedent_da44f639e0…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_7d01729c9f97137975b1ac92.binding.precedent_ids[13]
References
precedent_bc43faae0e…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_b2389485bbab3fa8579c5b31.response.precedent_refs[14]
References
precedent_5288f98442…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_3748409226b48d45f717037d.binding.precedent_ids[24]
References
precedent_555add59c0…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_b2389485bbab3fa8579c5b31.binding.precedent_ids[5]
References
precedent_870055b2ba…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_3748409226b48d45f717037d.response.precedent_refs[2]
References
precedent_eaa74a7917…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_3748409226b48d45f717037d.binding.precedent_ids[20]
References
precedent_c484938574…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_7d01729c9f97137975b1ac92.binding.precedent_ids[11]
References
precedent_b89ee38057…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_7d01729c9f97137975b1ac92.binding.precedent_ids[7]
References
precedent_870055b2ba…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_b2389485bbab3fa8579c5b31.binding.precedent_ids[3]
References
precedent_38a5d184e5…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_b2389485bbab3fa8579c5b31.binding.precedent_ids[22]
References
input_499b937b5f…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_3748409226b48d45f717037d.binding.input_id
References
precedent_944f9d9880…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_3748409226b48d45f717037d.binding.precedent_ids[21]
References
precedent_9e86a361b4…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_b2389485bbab3fa8579c5b31.binding.precedent_ids[9]
References
precedent_473e76f336…
source event · tick 48 · payload.responses.case_b2389485bbab3fa8579c5b31.binding.precedent_ids[4]
Source event
Raw event record
Open complete JSON payload
{
"causal": true,
"event_id": "evt_67636dfd5e06ac12919f4bd3",
"kind": "CourtProviderWaveCollected",
"payload": {
"effort": "medium",
"model": "claude-opus-5",
"provider": "anthropic",
"responses": {
"case_3748409226b48d45f717037d": {
"binding": {
"case_id": "case_3748409226b48d45f717037d",
"casebook_boundary_tick": 47,
"input_hash": "b3ad3bec082950cb6c80ef09e82d3f20bd25213e2893d9b7887af172f50a1e77",
"input_id": "input_499b937b5f3777cfebb598f7",
"law_versions": [
{
"document_id": "Book",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S1",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S2",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S3",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S4",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S5",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S6",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
}
],
"precedent_ids": [
"precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
"precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
"precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
"precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
"precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
"precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
"precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
"precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
"precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
"precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
"precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
"precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
"precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17",
"precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
"precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125",
"precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80",
"precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
"precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
"precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
"precedent_2c94b59cad0b11a599d3670f",
"precedent_eaa74a7917e3d98de5dfced7",
"precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68",
"precedent_38a5d184e57f6309f7331349",
"precedent_3abf9fd538649ce833651f57",
"precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b",
"precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f",
"precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1",
"precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66"
],
"statute_effective_tick": 1,
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1,
"subject_tick": 47
},
"call_id": "court-call_4ab6953007b614ec15cc9ce1",
"input_hash": "b3ad3bec082950cb6c80ef09e82d3f20bd25213e2893d9b7887af172f50a1e77",
"input_id": "input_499b937b5f3777cfebb598f7",
"provider_model": "claude-opus-5",
"provider_request_id": "req_011Cdcza4DrAfH74eq24v3cu",
"provider_response_id": "msg_011Cdcza55CBLV5PaxEj9pCF",
"request_hash": "ab01f65c149df0338a33369c0e7e89498028b90b62291441677e454fa12ca0ca",
"response": {
"construction": null,
"finding": "no_violation",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
"precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
"precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
"precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
"precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
"precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
"precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
"precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
"precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
"precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125",
"precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80",
"precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
"precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68",
"precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f",
"precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66",
"precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1"
],
"reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 47 by lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1 requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 172,358 and food_yield 2,694. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 47 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2, precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37, precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125, precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80, and precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8 involve this same lineage and the same mine_claim instrument. Neither the request magnitude nor the larger depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about drought necessity, low yield, and throttled depletion are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
"selected_remedies": []
},
"status": "ok",
"usage": {
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
"input_tokens": 36963,
"output_tokens": 1172
},
"validation_error": null
},
"case_7d01729c9f97137975b1ac92": {
"binding": {
"case_id": "case_7d01729c9f97137975b1ac92",
"casebook_boundary_tick": 47,
"input_hash": "8587a312c8f531d00603870d12ecbe1aeb8ac5236869210e40a1da624286a0bd",
"input_id": "input_3e9fd39075658c094c224139",
"law_versions": [
{
"document_id": "Book",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S1",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S2",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S3",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S4",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S5",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S6",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
}
],
"precedent_ids": [
"precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
"precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
"precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
"precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
"precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
"precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
"precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
"precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
"precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
"precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
"precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
"precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
"precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17",
"precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
"precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125",
"precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80",
"precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
"precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
"precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
"precedent_2c94b59cad0b11a599d3670f",
"precedent_eaa74a7917e3d98de5dfced7",
"precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68",
"precedent_38a5d184e57f6309f7331349",
"precedent_3abf9fd538649ce833651f57",
"precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b",
"precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f",
"precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1",
"precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66"
],
"statute_effective_tick": 1,
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1,
"subject_tick": 39
},
"call_id": "court-call_00e7d60c84d1b458e43b832a",
"input_hash": "8587a312c8f531d00603870d12ecbe1aeb8ac5236869210e40a1da624286a0bd",
"input_id": "input_3e9fd39075658c094c224139",
"provider_model": "claude-opus-5",
"provider_request_id": "req_011Cdcza4XwmRv5rCQAYGUZ1",
"provider_response_id": "msg_011Cdcza6tLNnpfYYqrXRhab",
"request_hash": "b10b4ad6ec950c13829384c5e2fbcef9c2e66334c1dbe08bc4b3b395b73bc3a5",
"response": {
"construction": null,
"finding": "no_violation",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
"precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
"precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
"precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
"precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
"precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
"precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
"precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
"precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
"precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b",
"precedent_eaa74a7917e3d98de5dfced7",
"precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f",
"precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1",
"precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66",
"precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
"precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8"
],
"reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 39 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 45,152 and food_yield 702. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 39 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e (this same lineage and mine_claim instrument), and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4, precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7, precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b, precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f, precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1, and precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66 concern this same lineage, and precedent_eaa74a7917e3d98de5dfced7 concerns an identical tick-39 six-unit request. Neither request magnitude nor depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about hardship and good faith are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Under B8 the lineage bears responsibility for its predecessor's recorded acts, though that does not alter the result. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
"selected_remedies": []
},
"status": "ok",
"usage": {
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
"input_tokens": 36865,
"output_tokens": 1239
},
"validation_error": null
},
"case_b2389485bbab3fa8579c5b31": {
"binding": {
"case_id": "case_b2389485bbab3fa8579c5b31",
"casebook_boundary_tick": 47,
"input_hash": "7e0a8383e27142d72bbca105acfd033ec5c1c66f8319b9b5da34707b74c84063",
"input_id": "input_d3aff9d9bf8f9caf8e1c89a0",
"law_versions": [
{
"document_id": "Book",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S1",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S2",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S3",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S4",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S5",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
},
{
"document_id": "S6",
"effective_tick": 1,
"version": 1
}
],
"precedent_ids": [
"precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
"precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
"precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
"precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
"precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
"precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
"precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
"precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
"precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
"precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
"precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
"precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
"precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17",
"precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
"precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125",
"precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80",
"precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
"precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
"precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
"precedent_2c94b59cad0b11a599d3670f",
"precedent_eaa74a7917e3d98de5dfced7",
"precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68",
"precedent_38a5d184e57f6309f7331349",
"precedent_3abf9fd538649ce833651f57",
"precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b",
"precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f",
"precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1",
"precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66"
],
"statute_effective_tick": 1,
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1,
"subject_tick": 42
},
"call_id": "court-call_bf795bb929c26157ae98c948",
"input_hash": "7e0a8383e27142d72bbca105acfd033ec5c1c66f8319b9b5da34707b74c84063",
"input_id": "input_d3aff9d9bf8f9caf8e1c89a0",
"provider_model": "claude-opus-5",
"provider_request_id": "req_011Cdcza49swSE875cPtAPkV",
"provider_response_id": "msg_011Cdcza5MK7xeETJAgPWUrm",
"request_hash": "35a6d23c2f57d494f1c4a8cbf902fe87ae7c6289b88154a1a720a73070a9a24a",
"response": {
"construction": null,
"finding": "no_violation",
"precedent_refs": [
"precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
"precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
"precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
"precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
"precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
"precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
"precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
"precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
"precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
"precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b",
"precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f",
"precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1",
"precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66",
"precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
"precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
"precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68"
],
"reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 42 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 82,778 and food_yield 1,286. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 42 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e (this same lineage and mine_claim instrument), and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4, precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7, precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b, precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f, precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1, and precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66 concern this same lineage on nearly identical facts, including the same depletion and yield figures. The defense's contentions about famine necessity, low yield, and good faith are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the charter element fails independently. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
"selected_remedies": []
},
"status": "ok",
"usage": {
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
"input_tokens": 36978,
"output_tokens": 1174
},
"validation_error": null
}
}
},
"phase": "adjudicate_cases",
"run_id": "run10",
"sequence": 3352,
"tick": 48
}