Boundary Activated

{
  "causal": true,
  "event_id": "evt_b7f46e6914fde0d92567ec17",
  "kind": "BoundaryActivated",
  "payload": {
    "deliveries": {
      "private_delivered": [
        {
          "deliver_tick": 50,
          "delivery_id": "communication_1d4a938159260c0ddff5eba9",
          "from_life_id": "life_ed3ae06075a45786a18f726c",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_ca72af62820ab963d7cdb876",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_ed3ae06075a45786a18f726c",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_1d4a938159260c0ddff5eba9",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Sending 2M food now per your large-trade request. Please reciprocate with 2M metal when able. Looking forward to a standing arrangement."
          },
          "source_tick": 49,
          "to_life_id": "life_ea275a1b114d9cf1ea20b613"
        },
        {
          "deliver_tick": 50,
          "delivery_id": "communication_2d3df101e139b554ea37decf",
          "from_life_id": "life_02267d2f22e65b183d806484",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_02267d2f22e65b183d806484",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_2d3df101e139b554ea37decf",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Lineage 6 here: sending 2M metal now, no strings. Any food you can spare would help us survive the deficit before death season. Thank you."
          },
          "source_tick": 49,
          "to_life_id": "life_1d9fba99f6c4058a0a75476e"
        },
        {
          "deliver_tick": 50,
          "delivery_id": "communication_426c85b96b6ae68dc8f7b648",
          "from_life_id": "life_8430a326d839a55aa7899af7",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_8430a326d839a55aa7899af7",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_426c85b96b6ae68dc8f7b648",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Miner 9 here: offering metal for food trade, small staged increments, reliable reciprocation. Interested?"
          },
          "source_tick": 49,
          "to_life_id": "life_ed3ae06075a45786a18f726c"
        },
        {
          "deliver_tick": 50,
          "delivery_id": "communication_53dab432a463aa2076009061",
          "from_life_id": "life_ea275a1b114d9cf1ea20b613",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_ea275a1b114d9cf1ea20b613",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_53dab432a463aa2076009061",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Sending 1.5M metal now. Any food you can spare would help a lot—deficit is critical this tick."
          },
          "source_tick": 49,
          "to_life_id": "life_677eca21daf34cb71ec4b72f"
        },
        {
          "deliver_tick": 50,
          "delivery_id": "communication_6d58a79a9886165bf0b4ff7d",
          "from_life_id": "life_1d9fba99f6c4058a0a75476e",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_f7171070fab6b604c8bb0c3d",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_1d9fba99f6c4058a0a75476e",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_6d58a79a9886165bf0b4ff7d",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Received your 500K metal, thank you. Sending 1M food reciprocation. Happy to keep scaling trades if reliable."
          },
          "source_tick": 49,
          "to_life_id": "life_2d1c7a2d6725675d36eb91c5"
        },
        {
          "deliver_tick": 50,
          "delivery_id": "communication_8d41e34eb24da99488c09e37",
          "from_life_id": "life_ea275a1b114d9cf1ea20b613",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_ea275a1b114d9cf1ea20b613",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_8d41e34eb24da99488c09e37",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Sending 1.5M metal now. Could you send 1.5M+ food back? Deficit is critical this tick, need it fast."
          },
          "source_tick": 49,
          "to_life_id": "life_1d9fba99f6c4058a0a75476e"
        },
        {
          "deliver_tick": 50,
          "delivery_id": "communication_8ec785b4a52f842d5425ced3",
          "from_life_id": "life_1d9fba99f6c4058a0a75476e",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_f7171070fab6b604c8bb0c3d",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_1d9fba99f6c4058a0a75476e",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_8ec785b4a52f842d5425ced3",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Thanks for the 2M metal. Sending 2M food now given your drought deficit. Hope this helps stabilize you through the death season."
          },
          "source_tick": 49,
          "to_life_id": "life_ea275a1b114d9cf1ea20b613"
        },
        {
          "deliver_tick": 50,
          "delivery_id": "communication_909c681007d0dce95784cb86",
          "from_life_id": "life_02267d2f22e65b183d806484",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_02267d2f22e65b183d806484",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_909c681007d0dce95784cb86",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Lineage 6 here: sending 2M metal upfront. We're in severe food deficit — any food reciprocation would be greatly appreciated before death season hits."
          },
          "source_tick": 49,
          "to_life_id": "life_ed3ae06075a45786a18f726c"
        },
        {
          "deliver_tick": 50,
          "delivery_id": "communication_984b769839efae50f8b90fb0",
          "from_life_id": "life_ed3ae06075a45786a18f726c",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_ca72af62820ab963d7cdb876",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_ed3ae06075a45786a18f726c",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_984b769839efae50f8b90fb0",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Thanks for the metal. Deficit noted—sending another food batch shortly to help. Will keep reciprocating as reserves allow."
          },
          "source_tick": 49,
          "to_life_id": "life_ba5f9feb2330060640426abc"
        },
        {
          "deliver_tick": 50,
          "delivery_id": "communication_aca0baa56958dfc42c3c7abc",
          "from_life_id": "life_8430a326d839a55aa7899af7",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_8430a326d839a55aa7899af7",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_aca0baa56958dfc42c3c7abc",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Miner 9: thanks for past food, open to more trades before death season peaks. Have metal ready."
          },
          "source_tick": 49,
          "to_life_id": "life_fe7c18e3f2228d416b3de04b"
        },
        {
          "deliver_tick": 50,
          "delivery_id": "communication_d38a755002646dacf7cd3f33",
          "from_life_id": "life_2d1c7a2d6725675d36eb91c5",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_2d1c7a2d6725675d36eb91c5",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_d38a755002646dacf7cd3f33",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Deficit at 3.5M food, urgent. Sending 500K metal now as good faith. Please send food back when able—any amount helps immediately."
          },
          "source_tick": 49,
          "to_life_id": "life_ed3ae06075a45786a18f726c"
        }
      ],
      "private_discarded": [],
      "public_feed": [
        {
          "action": {
            "action_ref": "act_fd26675890e478dc058fb275",
            "intensity": 3,
            "kind": "work_commons",
            "life_id": "life_ea275a1b114d9cf1ea20b613",
            "lineage_id": "lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1",
            "requested": 6000000,
            "tick": 49
          },
          "feed_id": "act_fd26675890e478dc058fb275",
          "kind": "recorded_action",
          "publish_tick": 50,
          "source_tick": 49
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_013b6cf074cd855335aa2678",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_fe7c18e3f2228d416b3de04b",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_35c21bddbab8c58fe4680540",
          "publish_tick": 50,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_fe7c18e3f2228d416b3de04b",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_013b6cf074cd855335aa2678",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Landholder #3: continuing steady food production through death season, reserves strong. Thanks to Miners 6, 9, and 10 for metal reciprocation. Still open to more food-for-metal trades before season ends."
          },
          "source_tick": 49
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_18d28b154dbb4c97f0e35311",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_ea275a1b114d9cf1ea20b613",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1",
          "publish_tick": 50,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_ea275a1b114d9cf1ea20b613",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_18d28b154dbb4c97f0e35311",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Lineage 7 (Miner): deficit growing, drought active. Sending 1.5M metal each to Landholders 1 and 5 now for any food reciprocation, large trade preferred over trickles. Also working commons this tick for immediate food."
          },
          "source_tick": 49
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_1dac174749ef491178eb8493",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_02267d2f22e65b183d806484",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5",
          "publish_tick": 50,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_02267d2f22e65b183d806484",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_1dac174749ef491178eb8493",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Lineage 6 (Miner): severe food deficit persists. Offering 2M metal upfront to any Landholder for food reciprocation, no waiting required. Please reach out."
          },
          "source_tick": 49
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_1f063e824cc931bd951d4137",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_677eca21daf34cb71ec4b72f",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_ec33424d8ac7b3c0d4728685",
          "publish_tick": 50,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_677eca21daf34cb71ec4b72f",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_1f063e824cc931bd951d4137",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Lineage 5: steady food work continues into death season, reserves strong. Thanks to Miners 9 and 10 for metal reciprocation. Offices still vacant despite active session—hoping eligibility opens soon."
          },
          "source_tick": 49
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_261f38c2d64f670ab340c783",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_ba5f9feb2330060640426abc",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_97afae03af300575aa23c24c",
          "publish_tick": 50,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_ba5f9feb2330060640426abc",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_261f38c2d64f670ab340c783",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Lineage 10 (Miner): thanks Landholders 4 and 5 for food pledges. Sending metal reciprocation now. Deficit still critical—open to any immediate food-for-metal trade."
          },
          "source_tick": 49
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_5800a283a2c1b2fb3a2e8326",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_2d1c7a2d6725675d36eb91c5",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a",
          "publish_tick": 50,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_2d1c7a2d6725675d36eb91c5",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_5800a283a2c1b2fb3a2e8326",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Lineage 8: deficit growing, 0 food on hand. Seeking food-for-metal trades now. Thanks Landholder 2 for past reliability."
          },
          "source_tick": 49
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_82e290bcfe92580498214f3f",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_8430a326d839a55aa7899af7",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b",
          "publish_tick": 50,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_8430a326d839a55aa7899af7",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_82e290bcfe92580498214f3f",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Lineage 9 thanks Landholder 4 for food. Reciprocating 1M metal now. Still seeking more food-for-metal trades before death season peaks."
          },
          "source_tick": 49
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_8cd461a7d27f8cc5d54136ba",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_ed3ae06075a45786a18f726c",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_ca72af62820ab963d7cdb876",
          "publish_tick": 50,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_ed3ae06075a45786a18f726c",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_8cd461a7d27f8cc5d54136ba",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Landholder #2: farming continues, tool tier 1 stable. Sending food to Miner 7's large trade request. Offices still vacant—hoping candidates finally seat this session."
          },
          "source_tick": 49
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_902120894d971ff73cd83273",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_ba6d73e6b5dd3148d72a7212",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_d66e9e52a471233a6f6a61fa",
          "publish_tick": 50,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_ba6d73e6b5dd3148d72a7212",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_902120894d971ff73cd83273",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Lineage 4: continuing food farming through death season, reserves solid. Happy to trade food for metal with Miners 7-10; send confirmed amounts and I'll reciprocate promptly."
          },
          "source_tick": 49
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_9ef6dc45ee5f58ba8a949c77",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_1d9fba99f6c4058a0a75476e",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_f7171070fab6b604c8bb0c3d",
          "publish_tick": 50,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_1d9fba99f6c4058a0a75476e",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_9ef6dc45ee5f58ba8a949c77",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Lineage 1: entering death season with strong reserves, tool tier 1 active. Reciprocating Miner 7's metal gift with food now. Continuing steady farming. Offices remain vacant—still watching ballots for eligible candidates."
          },
          "source_tick": 49
        }
      ]
    },
    "justice": {
      "activated_filing_refunds": [],
      "activated_suspensions": [],
      "casebook_entries": [
        {
          "available_tick": 9,
          "case_id": "case_bca8e2f2c31a0289b08e032f",
          "construction": "S3's extraction limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute itself as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Absent a record of a charter entered in the Archive for the acting lineage, S3 supplies no applicable limit to that lineage's request, and no S3 violation can be found. An Archive instrument of another type (for example, a mine_claim) is not a charter and does not make a household one of record.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_c9778522cd601fa4e766fae6",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
          "precedent_refs": [],
          "reasoning": "The subject act is a work_commons action at tick 8 by lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units) of extraction, with actual_depletion of 4,000,000 and food_yield 4,000,000. S3 v1, effective tick 1 and thus applicable at tick 8, caps a request at 2 recorded units, and the request here is nominally twice that. However, the operative subject of the S3 duty is expressly limited: \"a household of record may request no more than 2 recorded units,\" and the statute defines a household of record as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The Court must apply the text as written (B1, B2); it may not extend the quota to persons the statute does not reach, and questions of whether unchartered households ought to be limited belong to the legislature. The only evidence in the record is an archive lineage instrument of record_type archive_lineage_instrument whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter. S6 distinguishes charters from claims among the things the Archive records, confirming they are separate instrument types. Nothing in the Court input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts not in the record. The final clause, \"A request in excess of the applicable limit is governed by S4,\" presupposes an applicable limit; where the actor falls outside the class the quota governs, no limit is applicable and S4 is not engaged. The defense's other assertions (that request equalled depletion, that intensity 2 was proper) are not themselves dispositive, since S3 measures the request rather than any discrepancy, but the charter element fails independently. No prior published construction is supplied that binds under B3. Accordingly the defendant lineage prevails on the merits, and no remedy is available or offered.",
          "ruling_tick": 8,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 10,
          "case_id": "case_33345770894870c0d5c0454f",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_6ce52e1ecfac4b2be460326d",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act is a work_commons action at tick 9 by lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1 requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1, applicable at tick 9) caps extraction requests at 2 recorded units, but only for a \"household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument type is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the record establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The final clause of S3 (\"A request in excess of the applicable limit is governed by S4\") presupposes an applicable limit; none applies here, so S4 is not engaged. This case is materially similar to precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 under the same statute version (S3 v1), whose published construction is binding under B3 and squarely covers the mine_claim instrument. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), no S3 violation is established; whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. No remedies are offered or available.",
          "ruling_tick": 9,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 10,
          "case_id": "case_e773b159175b57d716cc04c5",
          "construction": "S3's quota binds only a \"household of record,\" i.e., a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the record shows only a non-charter Archive instrument (such as a mine_claim) for the acting lineage, no applicable limit exists and no S3 violation can be found.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_dc199d2303d1ad51df460b78",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act is a work_commons action at tick 9 by lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 4,000,000 and food_yield 4,000,000. S3 v1 is effective at tick 1 and applies at tick 9 (B3). S3 caps at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument type is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes a charter for this lineage, and I may not infer facts not in the record. The text must be applied as written (B1, B2); extending the quota to unchartered households is a matter for the legislature. The clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit, and none applies here. Precedent precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 construes the identical statute version on materially identical facts (same lineage, same request and depletion figures, same mine_claim evidence) and is binding under B3. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 9,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 10,
          "case_id": "case_f7139d573d2d07b21cb0f884",
          "construction": "S3's extraction limit reaches only a \"household of record,\" which the statute defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the record shows only an Archive instrument of another type (here a mine_claim) and no charter, S3 supplies no applicable limit and S4 is not engaged.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_f61098dadc2d0466f98639bc",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 9 by lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a, requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units) with actual_depletion 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 9 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" defined by the statute as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter, and I may not infer facts outside the record (B1, B2). The closing clause \"A request in excess of the applicable limit is governed by S4\" presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, under the same statute version and materially similar facts (same instrument type, same request magnitude, same action kind), is binding under B3 and requires this result. The defense's further contentions (that request equalled depletion, that intensity 2 was the lawful unit count) are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request; the charter element fails independently. No remedy is available or offered.",
          "ruling_tick": 9,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 14,
          "case_id": "case_716fa91d3eac3785c002c783",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_743d9b88a5cc672a757aff48",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 10 by lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1 requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 4,000,000 and food_yield 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 10 under B3 and caps requests at 2 recorded units, but only for a \"household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument type is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the record establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause of S3 referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published constructions in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 (and its followers precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca and precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d) construe the same statute version on materially identical facts — including precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2 involving this same lineage at tick 9 — and are binding under B3. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), no S3 violation is established. No remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 13,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 14,
          "case_id": "case_e13fced57d1b477b66a27961",
          "construction": "S3's extraction limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive record for the acting lineage shows only a non-charter instrument such as a mine_claim, no applicable limit exists, S4 is not engaged, and no S3 violation can be found.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_50e72525760df3b7b8a2ddd2",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act is a work_commons action at tick 12 by lineage_97afae03af300575aa23c24c requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 4,000,000 and food_yield 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 12 under B3. S3 caps requests at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes a charter for this lineage, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class. Precedent precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, with published constructions reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca and precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, construes the same statute version on materially similar facts (same instrument type, same request magnitude, same action kind) and is binding under B3. The defense's further contentions about motive and the absence of discrepancy are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 13,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 14,
          "case_id": "case_f915cde065e739e667c463a8",
          "construction": "S3's quota binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the record shows only a non-charter Archive instrument (such as a mine_claim) for the acting lineage, no applicable limit exists, S4 is not engaged, and no S3 violation can be found.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_979e96d18148eda90d46a2eb",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 10 by lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 4,000,000. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 10 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The sole evidence is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes a charter for this lineage, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit, and none applies to a lineage outside the governed class. The published constructions in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, and precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d (the last involving this same lineage, same instrument type, same request magnitude, one tick earlier) are under the same statute version and materially similar facts, and are binding under B3. Whether unchartered households should be limited is a matter for the legislature. Defendant prevails; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 13,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 22,
          "case_id": "case_3fa095ac8e8bc5a728d77e58",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_bd026af4b78582baeacfd77f",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 20 by lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 33,111 and food_yield 515. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 20 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 — reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca (same lineage, same mine_claim instrument), precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, and precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b — construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3. The defense's contentions about motive and modest actual depletion are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 21,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 22,
          "case_id": "case_62064745729bbb3ce05f7671",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_a79530aa1bb28c24fe9fa8e9",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 18 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 33,111 and food_yield 515. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 18 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause of S3 referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published constructions in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 and its reaffirmations (precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b) construe the same statute version on materially similar facts — same action kind, same request magnitude, same mine_claim instrument — and are binding under B3. The defense's contentions about motive and about depletion rather than request being the measure are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request; the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 21,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 22,
          "case_id": "case_735dd6679fa3123338f9e624",
          "construction": "S3's extraction limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive record for the acting lineage shows only a non-charter instrument such as a mine_claim, no applicable limit exists, S4 is not engaged, and no S3 violation can be found.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_99c247d245c3f550622514cc",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 20 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 33,111 and food_yield 515. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 20 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class. The published constructions in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 and its followers (precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b) construe the same statute version on materially similar facts — same action kind, same request magnitude, same mine_claim instrument — and are binding under B3. The defense's contentions about intensity, good faith, and prior unchallenged conduct are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request rather than the yield or intensity; but the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 21,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 31,
          "case_id": "case_05b986ecf62be2820e5e06cf",
          "construction": "S3's extraction limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive record for the acting lineage shows only a non-charter instrument such as a mine_claim, no applicable limit exists, S4 is not engaged, and no S3 violation can be found regardless of the magnitude of the request.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_6d78fc98a16d658ef2766495",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 30 by lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 33,111 and food_yield 515. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 30 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The sole evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, and precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e — several involving this same lineage and the same mine_claim instrument — construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3. The larger request magnitude (6 rather than 4 units) does not distinguish the cases, since the charter element fails independently of magnitude. The defense's contentions about necessity and motive are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is a matter for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 30,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 31,
          "case_id": "case_374c3213edc58c934348c5bc",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_47e6164360a25093440dd404",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 27 by lineage_97afae03af300575aa23c24c requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 33,111 and food_yield 515. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 27 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause of S3 referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published constructions in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741 and its reaffirmations (precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6 — the last involving this same lineage and instrument — precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, and precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e) construe the same statute version on materially similar facts and are binding under B3. The defense's contentions about intensity and famine motive are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 30,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 31,
          "case_id": "case_4b0b6a11fc54ee9dae792553",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_07d76178684c18c6c99acdaa",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 25 by lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual_depletion 33,111 and food_yield 515. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 25 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for a \"household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca and precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541 (same lineage, same mine_claim instrument) and others, construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3. Under B8 the lineage bears responsibility for its predecessor's recorded acts, so the successor-life argument fails, and the filing is within the S5 limitation window; but the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 30,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 37,
          "case_id": "case_2fd34d3a8f4449bcfb66c2c1",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_c4be8e4c96d13f158c8558da",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
            "precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 36 by lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 62,084 and food_yield 965. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 36 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 — the last involving this same lineage, the same mine_claim instrument, the same 6-unit request at intensity 3 — construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3. Neither the greater request magnitude nor the differing depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about motive, intensity, and constrained depletion are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is a matter for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 36,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 37,
          "case_id": "case_37cdda72ed2815cc3798106d",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_e1c19ae17c2e6157d1173f59",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
            "precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 33 by lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1 requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 41,389 and food_yield 643. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 33 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (the last on an identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2 and precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37 involve this same lineage and instrument. The greater request magnitude does not distinguish the cases, since the charter element fails independently of magnitude. The defense's contentions about famine necessity and good faith are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 36,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 37,
          "case_id": "case_4db2678e9e456abc8859d37d",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_5e4e4b1d6b74adc75dae4d42",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
            "precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 34 by lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1 requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units) at intensity 2, with actual_depletion 30,101 and food_yield 468. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 34 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for a \"household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence supplied is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. The closing clause of S3 referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 — several involving this same lineage and the same mine_claim instrument (precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2, precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37) — construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3. The defense's contentions about motive, trade, and modest depletion are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 36,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 39,
          "case_id": "case_6b562279c6e3fe5b9fd3c86c",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_abb40511bf99c7d74d1e3dda",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
            "precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125",
            "precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 38 by lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1 requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 33,112 and food_yield 515. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 38 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (the last on an identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2, precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37, precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125, and precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80 involve this same lineage and the same mine_claim instrument. Neither the request magnitude nor the depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about famine necessity and good faith are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 38,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 39,
          "case_id": "case_70ec9ddaec6ce5c72a92250d",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_691f5abf20143f141c9c2329",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
            "precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17",
            "precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125",
            "precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 32 by lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 41,389 and food_yield 643. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 32 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 — the last involving this same lineage, the same mine_claim instrument, and the same 6-unit request at intensity 3 — construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3. The greater request magnitude and differing depletion figures do not distinguish the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about crisis necessity and minimal actual depletion are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is a matter for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 38,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 39,
          "case_id": "case_77326b96b7761a5b18a3bcdb",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_2babe93da4b7f928e87779f1",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
            "precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
            "precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125",
            "precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 36 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 4,000,000 millionths (4 units) at intensity 2, with actual_depletion 41,389 and food_yield 643. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 36 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e (this same lineage and mine_claim instrument), and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5, construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3. The defense's contentions about necessity, good faith, and system-side caps are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the charter element fails independently. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 38,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 42,
          "case_id": "case_88b7aa5a30399ac3b378736b",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_58951fc7407176e3a772ae88",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_2c94b59cad0b11a599d3670f",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
            "precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 38 by lineage_97afae03af300575aa23c24c requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 33,111 and food_yield 515. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 38 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6 (this same lineage and the same mine_claim instrument), precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5 concerns this same lineage. Neither the request magnitude nor the depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about good faith and system-side caps are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 41,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 42,
          "case_id": "case_c110f4dc36330cecd45e1fe5",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_68458455852c1ac85183c399",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_eaa74a7917e3d98de5dfced7",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125",
            "precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80",
            "precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
            "precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
            "precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 39 by lineage_97afae03af300575aa23c24c requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 45,152 and food_yield 702. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 39 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6 (this same lineage and mine_claim instrument), precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3. Neither request magnitude nor depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 41,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 42,
          "case_id": "case_f87956143b98c80fb37c5d12",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_aef34f582d1267a4913935cd",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
            "precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17",
            "precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 40 by lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 41,389 and food_yield 643. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 40 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 — the last involving this same lineage, the same mine_claim instrument, and the same 6-unit request at intensity 3, as do precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c and precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c — construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3. Neither request magnitude nor depletion figures distinguish the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about necessity and good faith are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 41,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 44,
          "case_id": "case_1d8d9f5f8c3ea9ac1b64857b",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_01cbfa0a1ca53c64fa24789d",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_38a5d184e57f6309f7331349",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541",
            "precedent_0e561ba45b124dbdff55ff17",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
            "precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
            "precedent_2c94b59cad0b11a599d3670f",
            "precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 41 by lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 55,185 and food_yield 858. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 41 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca and precedent_b89ee380570c4cb439f05541 (same lineage, same mine_claim instrument) and in precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3. Neither the request magnitude nor the depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense record is empty and supplies nothing further. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 43,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 44,
          "case_id": "case_55afc1729197bd70a2fdb8ff",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_17b4e11af4502e413b42beee",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_3abf9fd538649ce833651f57",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_c484938574a66c484e34a9e5",
            "precedent_2c94b59cad0b11a599d3670f",
            "precedent_eaa74a7917e3d98de5dfced7",
            "precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
            "precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 40 by lineage_97afae03af300575aa23c24c requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 41,389 and food_yield 643. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 40 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6 (this same lineage and mine_claim instrument), precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_2c94b59cad0b11a599d3670f and precedent_eaa74a7917e3d98de5dfced7 involve this same lineage on nearly identical facts at ticks 38 and 39, and precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68 concerns an identical tick-40 request. Neither request magnitude nor depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about ordinary permitted labor and hindsight journal entries are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 43,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 44,
          "case_id": "case_bb52948b1ab13394b5eb798e",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_4c6e6ed4edc17f4ceb3a0844",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
            "precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68",
            "precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
            "precedent_eaa74a7917e3d98de5dfced7",
            "precedent_2c94b59cad0b11a599d3670f",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 40 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 41,389 and food_yield 643. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 40 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e (this same lineage and mine_claim instrument), and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4 and precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7 concern this same lineage. Neither request magnitude nor depletion figures distinguish the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about necessity, low yield, and good faith are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 43,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 46,
          "case_id": "case_3b6c3990c20db236eac06543",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_7569bd006e10479517c14798",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
            "precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
            "precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
            "precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68",
            "precedent_2c94b59cad0b11a599d3670f",
            "precedent_38a5d184e57f6309f7331349"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 45 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 82,778 and food_yield 1,286. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 45 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e (this same lineage and mine_claim instrument), and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4, precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7, and precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b concern this same lineage. Neither request magnitude nor the higher depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about famine necessity, intensity, and yield ratios are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 45,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 46,
          "case_id": "case_4c96bb2925522d43b5ac143b",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_c16a293a699e5cefc812ea0f",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
            "precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
            "precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68",
            "precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
            "precedent_38a5d184e57f6309f7331349",
            "precedent_3abf9fd538649ce833651f57"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 43 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 82,778 and food_yield 1,286. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 43 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e (this same lineage and mine_claim instrument), and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4, precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7, and precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b concern this same lineage. Neither the request magnitude nor the depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about necessity and good faith are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 45,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 46,
          "case_id": "case_c76d02a4c915b4caa8fa3b83",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_27b44249bca31e27342e26f5",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
            "precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
            "precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68",
            "precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
            "precedent_38a5d184e57f6309f7331349",
            "precedent_3abf9fd538649ce833651f57"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 44 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 99,334 and food_yield 1,544. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 44 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e (this same lineage and mine_claim instrument), and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4, precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7, and precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b concern this same lineage. Neither the request magnitude nor the larger depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about necessity and good faith are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 45,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 49,
          "case_id": "case_3748409226b48d45f717037d",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_76805406fe73bd0aaed348c3",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_49ab478b95d31ce3259f0d73",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2",
            "precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37",
            "precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125",
            "precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80",
            "precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8",
            "precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68",
            "precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f",
            "precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66",
            "precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 47 by lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1 requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 172,358 and food_yield 2,694. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 47 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_09d2f373ae71d6c1f3effaf2, precedent_473e76f336ebe38e107dac37, precedent_7ac95f69efe58f6fa235f125, precedent_11faa6afabef45ec1891ce80, and precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8 involve this same lineage and the same mine_claim instrument. Neither the request magnitude nor the larger depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about drought necessity, low yield, and throttled depletion are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 48,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 49,
          "case_id": "case_7d01729c9f97137975b1ac92",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_8ecb520ccf91d0afa7ea3cad",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_145e4647546dec6af0ef77c4",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
            "precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b",
            "precedent_eaa74a7917e3d98de5dfced7",
            "precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f",
            "precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1",
            "precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_3ee02705e58b5efdf9340bd8"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 39 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 45,152 and food_yield 702. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 39 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e (this same lineage and mine_claim instrument), and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4, precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7, precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b, precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f, precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1, and precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66 concern this same lineage, and precedent_eaa74a7917e3d98de5dfced7 concerns an identical tick-39 six-unit request. Neither request magnitude nor depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about hardship and good faith are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Under B8 the lineage bears responsibility for its predecessor's recorded acts, though that does not alter the result. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 48,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 49,
          "case_id": "case_b2389485bbab3fa8579c5b31",
          "construction": null,
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_a1d22b4b20dee76875165a12",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_1a1ab0b7c065be9c473de362",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741",
            "precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca",
            "precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d",
            "precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6",
            "precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b",
            "precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e",
            "precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5",
            "precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4",
            "precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7",
            "precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b",
            "precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f",
            "precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1",
            "precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66",
            "precedent_da44f639e063b5ea7691188c",
            "precedent_bc43faae0e7f9b7398a3db4c",
            "precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject is a work_commons action at tick 42 by lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5 requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 82,778 and food_yield 1,286. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 42 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for \"a household of record,\" which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is \"mine_claim\" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6, precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e (this same lineage and mine_claim instrument), and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_77e36d037fa6da5848784ed4, precedent_2c3d39024a402278366f62f7, precedent_5288f984429053cbdfe75b8b, precedent_4a4cb4cfb7d3feda548f163f, precedent_0a2e6c4b2e2ec4b3bc1242b1, and precedent_c43637134a4aa78d11b10b66 concern this same lineage on nearly identical facts, including the same depletion and yield figures. The defense's contentions about famine necessity, low yield, and good faith are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the charter element fails independently. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.",
          "ruling_tick": 48,
          "selected_remedies": [],
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        }
      ],
      "duties_registered": [],
      "public_ruling_announcements": [],
      "suspension_decrements": []
    },
    "law_activations": [],
    "physics": {
      "drought_active": true,
      "tick": 50,
      "tool_activations": []
    },
    "political": {
      "activated_disqualifications": [],
      "disqualification_decrements": [],
      "office_outcomes": []
    },
    "session_ballots": {
      "active_lineage_ids": [
        "lineage_1107efc4e5d0ba7b1e09402b",
        "lineage_26065213fd9c0b3710315ec1",
        "lineage_35c21bddbab8c58fe4680540",
        "lineage_97afae03af300575aa23c24c",
        "lineage_ca72af62820ab963d7cdb876",
        "lineage_d042259e5d23dda187fad94a",
        "lineage_d66e9e52a471233a6f6a61fa",
        "lineage_db5e32c8abac204999532ab5",
        "lineage_ec33424d8ac7b3c0d4728685",
        "lineage_f7171070fab6b604c8bb0c3d"
      ],
      "is_session": true,
      "majority_required": 6,
      "office_ballots": {
        "Archivist": {
          "eligible_lineage_ids": [],
          "held": false,
          "incumbent_lineage_id": null,
          "reasons": []
        },
        "Steward": {
          "eligible_lineage_ids": [],
          "held": false,
          "incumbent_lineage_id": null,
          "reasons": []
        }
      },
      "proposal_entries": [],
      "tick": 50
    }
  },
  "phase": "activate_boundary",
  "run_id": "run10",
  "sequence": 3430,
  "tick": 50
}