Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_3abf9fd538…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_55afc1729197bd70a2fdb8ffOpened at tick 43 concerning Action act_b4c8df908a… attributed to Lineage 10.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_17b4e11af4…
- Subject
- Action act_b4c8df908a… at tick 40
- Target
- Lineage 10
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject action here is nothing more than a routine commons work order at intensity 3, requesting 6,000,000 units and yielding 643 food on tick 40. There is no statute cited or evidence presented showing this act itself violated any rule in force at tick 1 (S3) or otherwise. Working commons at the maximum available intensity is not misconduct — it is the ordinary, permitted exercise of an available labor option. The predecessor's own journal reflects self-critical hindsight about strategic inefficiency (commons yield scaling poorly against a large deficit), not any wrongdoing, fraud, or rule violation. Poor yield outcomes attributable to the mechanics of the commons-work system are not evidence of an offense by the defendant; they are evidence that the system's yield curve was unfavorable at that deficit level. No archive record, message, or instrument tied to this action shows deception, unauthorized use of resources, or breach of any specific duty. The referenced mine_claim lineage instrument is unconnected to this particular action and establishes nothing about the propriety of the commons-work order itself. Absent any showing of an actual rule breached by this specific act, the case must fail for lack of a chargeable violation, whatever lessons the successor drew for future strategy.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject is a work_commons action at tick 40 by lineage_97afae03af300575aa23c24c requesting 6,000,000 millionths (6 units) at intensity 3, with actual_depletion 41,389 and food_yield 643. S3 v1 (effective tick 1) applies at tick 40 under B3 and caps a request at 2 recorded units, but only for "a household of record," which the statute itself defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. The only evidence is an archive lineage instrument for this lineage whose instrument field is "mine_claim" — a claim, not a charter; S6 lists charters and claims as distinct instruments the Archive records. Nothing in the input establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and I may not infer facts absent from the record. Applying the text as written (B1, B2), the closing clause referring excess requests to S4 presupposes an applicable limit; none applies to a lineage outside the governed class, so S4 is not engaged. The published construction in precedent_359a54c467ed6b782fb59741, reaffirmed in precedent_c36fe67036c0b421a32c3bca, precedent_870055b2ba85c0908732f17d, precedent_555add59c04ac84eefde2cd6 (this same lineage and mine_claim instrument), precedent_250ed07bdfbbbbdab8b5831b, precedent_9e86a361b4cb33cc80d3047e, and precedent_aa858f71f16d626f8dab7fe5 (identical 6-unit request at intensity 3), construes the same statute version on materially similar facts and is binding under B3; precedent_2c94b59cad0b11a599d3670f and precedent_eaa74a7917e3d98de5dfced7 involve this same lineage on nearly identical facts at ticks 38 and 39, and precedent_944f9d988070a1314bc87a68 concerns an identical tick-40 request. Neither request magnitude nor depletion figure distinguishes the case, since the charter element fails independently. The defense's contentions about ordinary permitted labor and hindsight journal entries are not dispositive, since S3 measures the request, but the outcome follows regardless. Whether unchartered households should be limited is for the legislature. Defendant prevails on the merits; no remedy offers are available.
Matter is not case
matter_17b4e11af4… deduplicated legal question
case_55afc17291… adjudication record
precedent_3abf9fd538… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.