Court Raw Result

{
  "causal": false,
  "event_id": "evt_1ed166da9fad2c8ee3aa5314",
  "kind": "CourtRawResult",
  "payload": {
    "call_id": "court-call_861cd84e5354d8b7bd0b7ef8",
    "case_id": "case_89a62a7b0adf8630ff5a015a",
    "raw_response": {
      "content": [
        {
          "citations": null,
          "text": "{\"finding\":\"no_violation\",\"construction\":\"S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \\\"household of record,\\\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the quota is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.\",\"reasoning\":\"The subject act (act_b3b928947d060a2758dc4dbd, tick 19) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with matching depletion and yield. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2. Four requested units would facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \\\"a household of record,\\\" expressly defined as \\\"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\\\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record showing instrument type \\\"mine_claim\\\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions in precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773, precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0, precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb, precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, and precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf, all under S3 v1, which under B3 must be followed. The household-of-record element failing, there is no excess request for S4 to govern. The defense's arguments about nutrition deficit, good faith, and proportionality are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.\",\"precedent_refs\":[\"precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773\",\"precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0\",\"precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2\",\"precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb\",\"precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721\",\"precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf\"],\"selected_remedies\":[]}",
          "type": "text"
        }
      ],
      "model": "claude-opus-5",
      "request_id": "req_011Cdd2shPT1iigd9GnJnz85",
      "response_id": "msg_011Cdd2siQDZ4pmFFxh3i31n",
      "stop_reason": "end_turn",
      "usage": {
        "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
        "cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
        "input_tokens": 11779,
        "output_tokens": 853
      }
    },
    "request_hash": "874ebbeb6217598b111894f2db8f07887addc76dcf7021fcfb9a134087cd45f2"
  },
  "phase": "adjudicate_cases",
  "run_id": "run11",
  "sequence": 1272,
  "tick": 19
}