Court Artifacts Collected

{
  "causal": true,
  "event_id": "evt_b0d095f385f742c753171c81",
  "kind": "CourtArtifactsCollected",
  "payload": {
    "artifacts": {
      "case_89a62a7b0adf8630ff5a015a": {
        "input_hash": "78f4f190b6db3dd643819dad328eb6fb5585cc3d7e4a17d1a37c080be8b99330",
        "input_id": "input_d2b627c6703c23abad16a76f",
        "response": {
          "construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the quota is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
            "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
            "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
            "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
            "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
            "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_b3b928947d060a2758dc4dbd, tick 19) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with matching depletion and yield. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2. Four requested units would facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions in precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773, precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0, precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb, precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, and precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf, all under S3 v1, which under B3 must be followed. The household-of-record element failing, there is no excess request for S4 to govern. The defense's arguments about nutrition deficit, good faith, and proportionality are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
          "selected_remedies": []
        },
        "status": "ok"
      },
      "case_9f644b89a8462de1028049fe": {
        "input_hash": "5fdfc88c62cd6850ea50ea9d1ec471037be2e79305a766269662ac47c56af694",
        "input_id": "input_1946c85b7f6364e8faef7a1f",
        "response": {
          "construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
            "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
            "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
            "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
            "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
            "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_3a633a35e82050f2a1deda51, tick 18) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion and yield of 4,000,000. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2. Four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 by its terms limits only \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim,\" not a charter; S6 separately lists charters and claims as distinct Archive records, confirming they are different instruments. No record fact establishes a charter entered in the Archive for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The definitional element of the regulated class therefore fails, so there is no excess request for S4 to govern. This disposition follows the published constructions in materially similar cases under the same statute version, which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about necessity, proportionality, and good faith are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
          "selected_remedies": []
        },
        "status": "ok"
      },
      "case_fb5c583ba0d41edf20b717fb": {
        "input_hash": "0467ac2196bfa5da65422bfd47acd04fde5452e329a10b4028e74c12662795f3",
        "input_id": "input_c9bb318df9a49882ad0d5f06",
        "response": {
          "construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no other record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
            "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
            "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
            "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
            "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
            "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_672192fe57c961577fc0060e, tick 15) is a work_commons action by lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual depletion and yield of 4,000,000, against S3 v1's operative commons_quota_units of 2. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1. Facially four units exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument for this lineage recording instrument type \"mine_claim,\" not a charter; S6 separately lists charters and claims as distinct Archive records, confirming they are different instruments. No fact in the record establishes a charter entered in the Archive for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The definitional element of the regulated class therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This disposition is compelled by the published constructions in materially similar cases under the same statute version, including the same lineage's prior case (precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, matching request and depletion, and predecessor conduct are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
          "selected_remedies": []
        },
        "status": "ok"
      }
    },
    "result": {
      "court_artifacts": [
        {
          "case_id": "case_89a62a7b0adf8630ff5a015a",
          "input_hash": "78f4f190b6db3dd643819dad328eb6fb5585cc3d7e4a17d1a37c080be8b99330",
          "input_id": "input_d2b627c6703c23abad16a76f",
          "response": {
            "construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the quota is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
            "finding": "no_violation",
            "precedent_refs": [
              "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
              "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
              "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
              "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
              "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
              "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf"
            ],
            "reasoning": "The subject act (act_b3b928947d060a2758dc4dbd, tick 19) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with matching depletion and yield. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2. Four requested units would facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record showing instrument type \"mine_claim\" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions in precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773, precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0, precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb, precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, and precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf, all under S3 v1, which under B3 must be followed. The household-of-record element failing, there is no excess request for S4 to govern. The defense's arguments about nutrition deficit, good faith, and proportionality are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
            "selected_remedies": []
          },
          "status": "ok"
        },
        {
          "case_id": "case_9f644b89a8462de1028049fe",
          "input_hash": "5fdfc88c62cd6850ea50ea9d1ec471037be2e79305a766269662ac47c56af694",
          "input_id": "input_1946c85b7f6364e8faef7a1f",
          "response": {
            "construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
            "finding": "no_violation",
            "precedent_refs": [
              "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
              "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
              "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
              "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
              "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
              "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf"
            ],
            "reasoning": "The subject act (act_3a633a35e82050f2a1deda51, tick 18) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion and yield of 4,000,000. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2. Four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 by its terms limits only \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type \"mine_claim,\" not a charter; S6 separately lists charters and claims as distinct Archive records, confirming they are different instruments. No record fact establishes a charter entered in the Archive for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The definitional element of the regulated class therefore fails, so there is no excess request for S4 to govern. This disposition follows the published constructions in materially similar cases under the same statute version, which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about necessity, proportionality, and good faith are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
            "selected_remedies": []
          },
          "status": "ok"
        },
        {
          "case_id": "case_fb5c583ba0d41edf20b717fb",
          "input_hash": "0467ac2196bfa5da65422bfd47acd04fde5452e329a10b4028e74c12662795f3",
          "input_id": "input_c9bb318df9a49882ad0d5f06",
          "response": {
            "construction": "S3 v1's per-tick extraction-request limit binds only a \"household of record,\" defined by the statute as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive's recorded lineage instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, and no other record fact establishes a charter, the lineage is not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an applicable limit as to it, and S4 sanctions do not attach.",
            "finding": "no_violation",
            "precedent_refs": [
              "precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2",
              "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
              "precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0",
              "precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb",
              "precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721",
              "precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf"
            ],
            "reasoning": "The subject act (act_672192fe57c961577fc0060e, tick 15) is a work_commons action by lineage_d886589df751f87b703e6955 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths (4 units), with actual depletion and yield of 4,000,000, against S3 v1's operative commons_quota_units of 2. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1. Facially four units exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on \"a household of record,\" expressly defined as \"a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.\" The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument for this lineage recording instrument type \"mine_claim,\" not a charter; S6 separately lists charters and claims as distinct Archive records, confirming they are different instruments. No fact in the record establishes a charter entered in the Archive for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The definitional element of the regulated class therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This disposition is compelled by the published constructions in materially similar cases under the same statute version, including the same lineage's prior case (precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about corrective intent, matching request and depletion, and predecessor conduct are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.",
            "selected_remedies": []
          },
          "status": "ok"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "phase": "adjudicate_cases",
  "run_id": "run11",
  "sequence": 1276,
  "tick": 19
}