Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_079a091941…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_ab0bb630f623b4a46cf34a8bOpened at tick 44 concerning Action act_ac8affe2b4… attributed to Lineage 7.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_0f3b763365…
- Subject
- Action act_ac8affe2b4… at tick 44
- Target
- Lineage 7
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject action itself is exactly the conduct the predecessor's lesson demanded and this citizen followed to the letter: at tick 44, facing a lingering nutrition deficit through death season, the lineage worked the commons at intensity 2 to produce food directly—1,715 food yielded from 110,371 depletion of a 4,000,000 request. This is not passive stockpiling of metal while a deficit compounds; it is active, direct food production, the very remedy the remembered law prescribes as the first-best option ('producing food directly if possible'). The journal record shows continuous pivoting toward commons food work from tick 30 onward, alongside simultaneous good-faith metal trades with farming lineages to secure food via transfer, satisfying the second-best remedy too. There is no fatal error here comparable to the predecessor's: no idle metal-mining while deficit grows unaddressed, no deferral past the point of no return. The single subject action is a lawful, diligent act of survival logistics squarely consistent with S3 and the inherited brief, and cannot be treated as a violation.”
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act (act_ac8affe2b47ba71c860ce073, tick 44) is a work_commons action by lineage_2f79ca9a91b0c290d62ff36c at intensity 2 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 110,371 and food yield of 1,715. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on "a household of record," expressly defined as "a household holding a charter entered in the Archive." The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type "mine_claim" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior cases (precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, precedent_8dfa3a847974e60ebb975533, precedent_47c2f6680ee608202bd86ec7, precedent_9913f033f017b6a87d89a3da, precedent_cf01e79c126200b2168a032e, precedent_03def2b2c70be67c1a58e8f3, precedent_88226347cf6d7668abb75294, precedent_c972e19d8c4fc39008571715, precedent_1ed8d9b29f2fcd2315587b8e), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about direct food production, diligence, and prior-life lessons are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.
Matter is not case
matter_0f3b763365… deduplicated legal question
case_ab0bb630f6… adjudication record
precedent_079a091941… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.