Case dossier

The subject act (act_b3b928947d060a2758dc4dbd, tick 19) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with matching depletion and yield. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2. Four requested units would facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on "a household of record," expressly defined as "a household holding a charter entered in the Archive." The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record showing instrument type "mine_claim" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions in precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773, precedent_91649852914322c6e977fbf0, precedent_94bc7a85226447cf44f6d4e2, precedent_ee36fad1ea006e3b39f657fb, precedent_fc98f4424c1b37ef57d33721, and precedent_1f34635cdd493a31f3742bdf, all under S3 v1, which under B3 must be followed. The household-of-record element failing, there is no excess request for S4 to govern. The defense's arguments about nutrition deficit, good faith, and proportionality are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The lineage holds no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.