References
precedent_023c2a8986…
source event · tick 23 · payload.justice.casebook_entries[0].precedent_id
The engine is named on this casebook entry record. Nested record from event #1493.
{
"available_tick": 11,
"case_id": "case_8229785cd26c524db9b4c1f1",
"construction": "S3's extraction limit binds only a 'household of record,' which the statute defines as a household holding a charter entered in the Archive. Where the Archive record shows the lineage's entered instrument is a mine_claim rather than a charter, the lineage is not a household of record and no S3 limit is applicable to its extraction request; S4 sanctions therefore cannot attach.",
"finding": "no_violation",
"matter_id": "matter_66058de36197361e2ddac9d0",
"precedent_id": "precedent_023c2a89864928d0d466c773",
"precedent_refs": [],
"reasoning": "The subject act is a tick-10 work_commons action at intensity 2 with a recorded request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, against S3 v1's operative quota of 2 units. On its face the request exceeds two units. But S3 as written imposes the quota only on 'a household of record,' and defines that term as 'a household holding a charter entered in the Archive.' The only archive evidence in this record is the lineage instrument entry for lineage_b57fd3ef475a67fa6e900e83, which records instrument 'mine_claim' entered in the Archive. A mine_claim is not a charter; S6 separately distinguishes charters from claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming the two instruments are distinct. No fact in the record establishes that this lineage holds a charter entered in the Archive, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The lineage is therefore not a household of record, the two-unit limit is not an 'applicable limit' as to it, and there is no excess request for S4 to govern. Applying the text as written under the versions effective at tick 10 (B3), the charge fails. The defense's stewardship and prior-life arguments are not reached; the outcome rests on the definitional scope of S3. Because there is no violation, the S4 officeholder disqualification for the Archivist office does not arise, and no remedy is available (no remedy offers were made in any event).",
"ruling_tick": 10,
"selected_remedies": [],
"statute_id": "S3",
"statute_version": 1
}