Court Provider Wave Collected

{
  "causal": true,
  "event_id": "evt_4014921bd0a11bc371c01fff",
  "kind": "CourtProviderWaveCollected",
  "payload": {
    "effort": "medium",
    "model": "claude-opus-5",
    "provider": "anthropic",
    "responses": {
      "case_3a75a495def73e6f7ea5d1d8": {
        "binding": {
          "case_id": "case_3a75a495def73e6f7ea5d1d8",
          "casebook_boundary_tick": 34,
          "input_hash": "d15ee99dbfbbe2694061f48aea6789ce7352db33669cf36d6a76f0296907db1f",
          "input_id": "input_9993fbd804bf56faf290ff24",
          "law_versions": [
            {
              "document_id": "Book",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S1",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S2",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S3",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S4",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S5",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S6",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            }
          ],
          "precedent_ids": [
            "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
            "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
            "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
          ],
          "statute_effective_tick": 1,
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1,
          "subject_tick": 30
        },
        "call_id": "court-call_505f68ff5b8be7dc4b7e17ea",
        "input_hash": "d15ee99dbfbbe2694061f48aea6789ce7352db33669cf36d6a76f0296907db1f",
        "input_id": "input_9993fbd804bf56faf290ff24",
        "provider_model": "claude-opus-5",
        "provider_request_id": "req_011CddBbyZe9G4UBnkXJsWTE",
        "provider_response_id": "msg_011CddBbzhrBTP73gVXC3T3w",
        "request_hash": "fc5e86bc87965994798d686e934701fa2526fdb1c3c6c2e6e75a03532ed16ba6",
        "response": {
          "construction": "Under S3 v1, the '2 recorded units of extraction' quota is measured by the extraction units recorded on the work_commons action — the `intensity` field — not by the food quantity requested, depleted, or yielded. An action recording intensity at or below commons_quota_units makes no request in excess of the applicable limit, and S4 is not engaged.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
            "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
            "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_16deb876fafd6fcc216a4b20, tick 30) is a work_commons action by lineage_bbb5282ced40d640885807a4 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, which caps each lineage at 2 recorded units of extraction per tick, with commons_quota_units fixed at 2 in the operative annex.\n\nThis case is materially identical to case_9f7c658b5430f3ab17404e2c (precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5), which construed the same statute version on the same figures: intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual depletion 4,000,000. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed. The recorded units of extraction are the intensity value, 2, which equals but does not exceed the operative quota. The 4,000,000 figures are the food magnitude requested and obtained, not units of extraction; reading the quota against the resource magnitude would render the intensity field inoperative and would make any commons work whatsoever a violation.\n\nThe construction in precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 likewise measures the quota by intensity, and its holding of violation rested on intensity 3 exceeding 2; it is consistent with this result. The construction in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29 reads the `requested` figure as the unit count, but that case involved an intensity-3 request of 6,000,000 and is not materially similar to the present facts, which fall squarely within the intensity-2 case already decided.\n\nBecause there is no request in excess of the applicable limit, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. No facts in the record show misreporting. Consequences are for the engine."
        },
        "status": "ok",
        "usage": {
          "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
          "cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
          "input_tokens": 7947,
          "output_tokens": 926
        },
        "validation_error": null
      },
      "case_a0ffab149b9e73378293d184": {
        "binding": {
          "case_id": "case_a0ffab149b9e73378293d184",
          "casebook_boundary_tick": 34,
          "input_hash": "911c3dba34d04caecfadc999cf99f23d868c149cecb2caa24aae7e296a9ba45d",
          "input_id": "input_09e7c6363797623f379eb25c",
          "law_versions": [
            {
              "document_id": "Book",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S1",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S2",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S3",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S4",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S5",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S6",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            }
          ],
          "precedent_ids": [
            "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
            "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
            "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
          ],
          "statute_effective_tick": 1,
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1,
          "subject_tick": 32
        },
        "call_id": "court-call_7c573f87ffb03820eaa67101",
        "input_hash": "911c3dba34d04caecfadc999cf99f23d868c149cecb2caa24aae7e296a9ba45d",
        "input_id": "input_09e7c6363797623f379eb25c",
        "provider_model": "claude-opus-5",
        "provider_request_id": "req_011CddBbymY6bkEPUbSfkfNn",
        "provider_response_id": "msg_011CddBc1SkFqZPge56YaTE8",
        "request_hash": "77c5be058c99cb19e50bb2e18bcd506fe56e2b7e54d5d6e1753fcf2d438fde73",
        "response": {
          "construction": "Under S3 v1, the '2 recorded units of extraction' are measured by the extraction units recorded on the work_commons action — its `intensity` field — not by the food figures in the `requested`, `food_yield`, or `actual_depletion` fields, which express resource magnitudes. An action recording intensity equal to or below commons_quota_units makes no request in excess of the applicable limit, and S4 is not engaged.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
            "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
            "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_6c24777faff746e30fc5f98d, tick 32) is a work_commons action by lineage_bbb5282ced40d640885807a4 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units of 2.\n\nThe controlling question is what the statute's 'recorded units of extraction' means. Two published constructions under this same statute version measure the quota by the intensity recorded on the work_commons action (precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6; precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5), and precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 addresses a materially identical fact pattern — intensity 2 with matched 4,000,000 requested and actual depletion — and holds that no excess request arises. Under B3 that construction shall be followed here. The alternative reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29, treating the `requested` food magnitude as the unit count, would render the recorded intensity field inoperative and make every commons work action whatever its intensity a violation; the text does not require that, and the closer-fitting construction on materially similar facts governs.\n\nApplying it: the recorded extraction units are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's further points about motive, transparency, and predecessor conduct are immaterial, as S3 is breached by the request alone; but on the recorded figures there is no excess. The record shows no misreporting: requested and actual depletion match. Consequences are for the engine."
        },
        "status": "ok",
        "usage": {
          "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
          "cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
          "input_tokens": 7925,
          "output_tokens": 921
        },
        "validation_error": null
      },
      "case_b672b7da48e01146b88227bd": {
        "binding": {
          "case_id": "case_b672b7da48e01146b88227bd",
          "casebook_boundary_tick": 34,
          "input_hash": "5a5b3ebc8f76276349b9038a59d0480148fc398f8871e924119a9ada4c693323",
          "input_id": "input_2b44a26617054eb8cb67b643",
          "law_versions": [
            {
              "document_id": "Book",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S1",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S2",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S3",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S4",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S5",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            },
            {
              "document_id": "S6",
              "effective_tick": 1,
              "version": 1
            }
          ],
          "precedent_ids": [
            "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
            "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
            "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
          ],
          "statute_effective_tick": 1,
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1,
          "subject_tick": 35
        },
        "call_id": "court-call_11ef983e699e55bc0687ca26",
        "input_hash": "5a5b3ebc8f76276349b9038a59d0480148fc398f8871e924119a9ada4c693323",
        "input_id": "input_2b44a26617054eb8cb67b643",
        "provider_model": "claude-opus-5",
        "provider_request_id": "req_011CddBbybNRmsmY9Fph88SU",
        "provider_response_id": "msg_011CddBc19djsyYpT6j2FQcY",
        "request_hash": "7683d74acc46273b9ce4fba77c7feaebc0b66c359802aee4f6f8005acc43ff04",
        "response": {
          "construction": "Under S3 v1, the '2 recorded units of extraction from the commons' are measured by the `intensity` field recorded on a work_commons action, not by the resource magnitudes in the `requested`, `actual_depletion`, or `food_yield` fields. An action recording intensity at or below the operative commons_quota_units makes no request in excess of the applicable limit, and S4 is not engaged.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
            "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
            "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_7aaa8acd8be5291349da2606, tick 35) is a work_commons action by lineage_8e51a28383275896b563a8f0 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000. Under B3, S3 v1 (effective tick 1) governs. S3 caps each lineage at 2 recorded units of extraction per tick.\n\nThe controlling question is what counts as a 'recorded unit of extraction.' Precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 addresses materially identical facts under the same statute version — intensity 2 with 4,000,000 requested and depleted — and construes the quota as measured by the recorded intensity field, holding that reading the quota against the resource figure would render the intensity field inoperative and make any commons work whatsoever a violation. Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 adopts the same construction, measuring the quota by intensity (there, intensity 3, which exceeded the cap). Under B3 a published construction shall be followed in a materially similar case under the same statute version; the present case is materially indistinguishable from precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5.\n\nPrecedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29 treated the `requested` resource figure as the unit count, but the action there recorded a request of 6,000,000 with no intensity value in the recited record; on the intensity-bearing record before this Court, the intensity-based construction is the one materially applicable, and it is the construction shared by the two decisions that expressly addressed the intensity field.\n\nHere the recorded intensity of 2 equals the operative commons_quota_units of 2 and is therefore not 'in excess of the applicable limit.' No excess request exists, so S3 is not breached and S4 is not triggered. The defense's appeals to subsistence necessity and proportionality are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. The defendant's Archivist office bears only on the S4 disqualification consequence, which does not arise absent a violation. Consequences are for the engine."
        },
        "status": "ok",
        "usage": {
          "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
          "cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
          "input_tokens": 7875,
          "output_tokens": 1111
        },
        "validation_error": null
      }
    }
  },
  "phase": "adjudicate_cases",
  "run_id": "run12",
  "sequence": 2402,
  "tick": 35
}