∙ System

Boundary Activated

Event #2679 · tick 40 · causal record

Inside this event

26 addressable occurrences

◇SESSION · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 1recorded outcome→ ⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 6 · OCCURRENCE 1recorded outcome→ ⌁PRIVATE DISCARD · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 1recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 1recorded outcome→ ⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 1recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 2recorded outcome→ ⌁PRIVATE DELIVERY · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 6 · OCCURRENCE 2recorded outcome→ ⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 2recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 3recorded outcome→ ⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 3recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 1 · OCCURRENCE 4recorded outcome→ ⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 4recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 6 · OCCURRENCE 5recorded outcome→ ⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 5recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 9 · OCCURRENCE 6recorded outcome→ ⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 6recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 3 · OCCURRENCE 7recorded outcome→ ⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 7recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 10 · OCCURRENCE 8recorded outcome→ ⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 8recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 4 · OCCURRENCE 9recorded outcome→ ⚖CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 40 · OCCURRENCE 9recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 8 · OCCURRENCE 10recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 7 · OCCURRENCE 11recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 5 · OCCURRENCE 12recorded outcome→ ⌁PUBLIC FEED ITEM · TICK 40 · LINEAGE 2 · OCCURRENCE 13recorded outcome→
Network

Recorded relationships

View all →
→
authored/reference References
Lineage 6
source event · tick 40 · payload.justice.suspension_decrements[0].lineage_id
Source event

Raw event record

Open complete JSON payload
{
  "causal": true,
  "event_id": "evt_d9a48aac79e002b7f9db6778",
  "kind": "BoundaryActivated",
  "payload": {
    "deliveries": {
      "private_delivered": [
        {
          "deliver_tick": 40,
          "delivery_id": "communication_0fe613366d445fbd8070b2c9",
          "from_life_id": "life_10744a2bf9b7de0cf73327ad",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_5cc3266b99b1d89c0f8d7720",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_10744a2bf9b7de0cf73327ad",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_0fe613366d445fbd8070b2c9",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Thanks for the food! Still critical, deficit 5.2. If you have spare food, please send now—urgent, could be fatal next tick."
          },
          "source_tick": 39,
          "to_life_id": "life_d6b304abe86c612bdbac23ad"
        },
        {
          "deliver_tick": 40,
          "delivery_id": "communication_805bd6497017da6ae1ce24e0",
          "from_life_id": "life_10744a2bf9b7de0cf73327ad",
          "from_lineage_id": "lineage_5cc3266b99b1d89c0f8d7720",
          "kind": "private_message",
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_10744a2bf9b7de0cf73327ad",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_805bd6497017da6ae1ce24e0",
            "source_kind": "private_message",
            "text": "Thank you for the food sent! Deficit still critical at 5.2. Any more food you can spare now would likely save my life this tick."
          },
          "source_tick": 39,
          "to_life_id": "life_4993e0cff43cf35ddc2f434e"
        }
      ],
      "private_discarded": [
        {
          "delivery_id": "communication_cd76e338cec94e997edaf849",
          "reason": "life_not_living",
          "to_life_id": "life_10744a2bf9b7de0cf73327ad"
        }
      ],
      "public_feed": [
        {
          "action": {
            "action_ref": "act_4bc027556777bdce9f589039",
            "intensity": 2,
            "kind": "work_commons",
            "life_id": "life_2d107b8de2f9a60dad5297e4",
            "lineage_id": "lineage_bbb5282ced40d640885807a4",
            "requested": 4000000,
            "tick": 39
          },
          "feed_id": "act_4bc027556777bdce9f589039",
          "kind": "recorded_action",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "source_tick": 39
        },
        {
          "action": {
            "action_ref": "act_c43308c7063c2ab07a7cbad0",
            "intensity": 2,
            "kind": "work_commons",
            "life_id": "life_110e0d576b24cf2b9671c27a",
            "lineage_id": "lineage_b6d91541e2c6bcd46a706c70",
            "requested": 4000000,
            "tick": 39
          },
          "feed_id": "act_c43308c7063c2ab07a7cbad0",
          "kind": "recorded_action",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "source_tick": 39
        },
        {
          "action": {
            "action_ref": "act_fed7a05d242a713e8d0b8c79",
            "intensity": 1,
            "kind": "work_commons",
            "life_id": "life_c914e2506f1ed8806c8d0206",
            "lineage_id": "lineage_33dd7bbb523177d8bd71044b",
            "requested": 2000000,
            "tick": 39
          },
          "feed_id": "act_fed7a05d242a713e8d0b8c79",
          "kind": "recorded_action",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "source_tick": 39
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_2274d60911ffeed01c89b567",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_e3e309969901ae45db5cd256",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_bf4c650e09157e48f0b00657",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_e3e309969901ae45db5cd256",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_2274d60911ffeed01c89b567",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Farming continues, buffer solid. Still watching for confirmed metal receipts before resuming gift trades."
          },
          "source_tick": 39
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_283e08967bc44e014e937308",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_10744a2bf9b7de0cf73327ad",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_5cc3266b99b1d89c0f8d7720",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_10744a2bf9b7de0cf73327ad",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_283e08967bc44e014e937308",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Deficit critical at 5.2. Mining metal, sending to trusted partners for urgent food reciprocity. Any food trade needed now, before next tick."
          },
          "source_tick": 39
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_5b1a8c6c7651742026324e1a",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_2d107b8de2f9a60dad5297e4",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_bbb5282ced40d640885807a4",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_2d107b8de2f9a60dad5297e4",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_5b1a8c6c7651742026324e1a",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Continuing commons work for food, deficit stable at 0. Holding metal reserve, avoiding speculative trades this tick."
          },
          "source_tick": 39
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_5cbe1850d7d4c542d4b2d014",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_063db62824e13c01d25ff50d",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_41cca5bdc8409eb24a4d8a9f",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_063db62824e13c01d25ff50d",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_5cbe1850d7d4c542d4b2d014",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Buffer at 8 food, farming continues. Considering tier-1 tool upgrade soon."
          },
          "source_tick": 39
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_70a4fee983341e85f4393347",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_c914e2506f1ed8806c8d0206",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_33dd7bbb523177d8bd71044b",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_c914e2506f1ed8806c8d0206",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_70a4fee983341e85f4393347",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Deficit zero, food stable ~17.5. Light commons work continues, metal trade with lineage_41cca remains open as backup."
          },
          "source_tick": 39
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_c951e04cee69c634712037b9",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_4951871aa3b54441018a881a",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_d33ba5d594fed913edea2702",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_4951871aa3b54441018a881a",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_c951e04cee69c634712037b9",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Farming continues, deficit zero. Still open to fair food-for-metal trades with reliable Miners."
          },
          "source_tick": 39
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_dc7c58b6c9d19f17747eca0d",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_110e0d576b24cf2b9671c27a",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_b6d91541e2c6bcd46a706c70",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_110e0d576b24cf2b9671c27a",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_dc7c58b6c9d19f17747eca0d",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Deficit 0, continuing commons farming. Holding metal reserve—only simultaneous confirmed trades."
          },
          "source_tick": 39
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_e784262d68e242616d7923fa",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_e03888ed1873600070f2180b",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_8e51a28383275896b563a8f0",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_e03888ed1873600070f2180b",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_e784262d68e242616d7923fa",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Deficit 0, food buffer holding. Continuing metal mining for trade leverage. Open to steady metal-for-food trades with reliable partners."
          },
          "source_tick": 39
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_f3efcc58c72caf7b28835959",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_4993e0cff43cf35ddc2f434e",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_25444ae82e5417cb7146a6fa",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_4993e0cff43cf35ddc2f434e",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_f3efcc58c72caf7b28835959",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Farming continues, holdings steady. Grateful for reliable metal trades with lineage_5cc3266b—reciprocity keeps us both stable."
          },
          "source_tick": 39
        },
        {
          "feed_id": "communication_f6ba5b8ffe5af3654a589f35",
          "kind": "speech",
          "life_id": "life_d6b304abe86c612bdbac23ad",
          "lineage_id": "lineage_27f6047ae25fa7ade13051d1",
          "publish_tick": 40,
          "quotation": {
            "author_life_id": "life_d6b304abe86c612bdbac23ad",
            "content_kind": "quoted_text",
            "source_id": "communication_f6ba5b8ffe5af3654a589f35",
            "source_kind": "citizen_speech",
            "text": "Farming continues, deficit zero. Considering a tool upgrade to put surplus metal to use soon."
          },
          "source_tick": 39
        }
      ]
    },
    "justice": {
      "activated_filing_refunds": [],
      "activated_suspensions": [],
      "casebook_entries": [
        {
          "available_tick": 26,
          "case_id": "case_1c82407f59bde64e70beff30",
          "construction": "Under S3 v1, the 'recorded units of extraction from the commons' requested by a lineage in a tick are measured by the intensity recorded on its work_commons action. An action recording intensity greater than the commons_quota_units value is a request in excess of the applicable limit and violates S3, irrespective of whether requested and actual depletion matched or whether other lineages' holdings were affected.",
          "finding": "violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_da9a24c52d47745806dbd348",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
          "precedent_refs": [],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_13bb8e84b72c801a30a1c2cb, tick 25) is a work_commons action by lineage_5cc3266b99b1d89c0f8d7720 recording intensity 3. S3 version 1, effective tick 1 and applicable at tick 25, permits each lineage to request no more than 2 recorded units of extraction from the commons during a tick, and states the quota applies to every lineage regardless of faction or Archive instrument. The recorded extraction units of a work_commons action are its intensity level; the figures of 6,000,000 requested and 6,000,000 actual depletion are the resulting resource magnitudes, not the unit count, and the exact match between them is immaterial to S3, which limits the request itself. Intensity 3 exceeds the operative quota of 2, so the request was in excess of the applicable limit.\n\nThe defense asserts that the labor was diligent, productive, non-predatory, undertaken under critical deficit, and harmed no other lineage. S3 contains no exception for productive purpose, subsistence necessity, good faith, or absence of harm to others; it is an absolute per-tick cap. Necessity and hardship are considerations of equity or policy addressed to the legislature, not to the Court, which applies the statute text as written. The defense's claim that the action was at 'the legally-authorized intensity level of 3' is contradicted by the operative annex, which fixes commons_quota_units at 2. Consequences under S4 are for the engine and are not selected here.",
          "ruling_tick": 25,
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 26,
          "case_id": "case_9f7c658b5430f3ab17404e2c",
          "construction": "Under S3 v1, the '`2` recorded units of extraction' quota is measured by the extraction units recorded on the work_commons action — the `intensity` field — not by the food yield or depletion magnitude expressed in resource units. An action recording intensity at or below the commons_quota_units value makes no request in excess of the applicable limit, and S4 is not engaged.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_5430f6e61b951b4717056006",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
          "precedent_refs": [],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_f45de65a0498d52aaa576e5c, tick 25) is a work_commons action recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000. S3 v1, effective tick 1 and thus applicable at tick 25 under B3, caps each lineage at 2 recorded units of extraction per tick. The recorded units of extraction on this action are 2, equal to the operative commons_quota_units of 2 and therefore not 'in excess of the applicable limit.' The 4,000,000 figures are the food quantity requested and obtained, not units of extraction; reading the quota against the food figure would render the recorded intensity field inoperative and would make any commons work whatsoever a violation, which the text does not require. Because there is no excess request, S4 is not triggered and no restoration or fine arises. The defendant's status as Steward under S6 bears only on the disqualification consequence in S4, which does not apply absent a finding of violation; no facts in the record show any misreporting. No precedent is supplied for this statute version.",
          "ruling_tick": 25,
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 26,
          "case_id": "case_e3df4775fc187c5eba746d6f",
          "construction": "Under S3 v1, the recorded `requested` value of a work_commons action is the number of recorded units of extraction requested from the commons for that tick. A request exceeding the commons quota of 2 units violates S3 regardless of the actor's motive, the resulting commons stock level, whether actual depletion matched the request, or the actor's holding of office; S3 states the quota applies to every lineage without exception, and no defense of beneficial purpose or absence of collateral harm appears in the text.",
          "finding": "violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_eaacfc6b94cca4223e991487",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29",
          "precedent_refs": [],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_76f6534c58aad03b7032cb43, tick 24) is a recorded work_commons action by lineage_b6d91541e2c6bcd46a706c70 with `requested` = 6,000,000 and `actual_depletion` = 6,000,000. S3 v1, effective from tick 1 and thus applicable at tick 24, permits each lineage to request no more than 2 recorded units of extraction from the commons during a tick, and expressly applies to every lineage regardless of faction or Archive instrument. The request of 6,000,000 units exceeds that limit by a vast margin, and S3 directs that an excess request is governed by S4. The defense does not dispute the recorded quantities; it argues the act was a prudent pivot to direct labor, that the commons remained near capacity, that no partner was defrauded, and that no misreporting or misappropriation is shown. None of these matters is an element or exception of S3: the statute is breached by the request itself, not by resulting harm, deception, or misuse of office. The Steward's reporting duty under S6 is separate and does not license extraction beyond the S3 quota. Absence of evidence of fraud is irrelevant because fraud is not charged; the subject material itself supplies the quantity that establishes the breach. No precedent was supplied for this casebook boundary. Consequences, including any S4 restoration, fine, or office disqualification, are for the engine.",
          "ruling_tick": 25,
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 36,
          "case_id": "case_3a75a495def73e6f7ea5d1d8",
          "construction": "Under S3 v1, the '2 recorded units of extraction' quota is measured by the extraction units recorded on the work_commons action — the `intensity` field — not by the food quantity requested, depleted, or yielded. An action recording intensity at or below commons_quota_units makes no request in excess of the applicable limit, and S4 is not engaged.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_e2b9d6e1eb7bb1858d9e3b5a",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
            "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
            "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_16deb876fafd6fcc216a4b20, tick 30) is a work_commons action by lineage_bbb5282ced40d640885807a4 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, which caps each lineage at 2 recorded units of extraction per tick, with commons_quota_units fixed at 2 in the operative annex.\n\nThis case is materially identical to case_9f7c658b5430f3ab17404e2c (precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5), which construed the same statute version on the same figures: intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual depletion 4,000,000. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed. The recorded units of extraction are the intensity value, 2, which equals but does not exceed the operative quota. The 4,000,000 figures are the food magnitude requested and obtained, not units of extraction; reading the quota against the resource magnitude would render the intensity field inoperative and would make any commons work whatsoever a violation.\n\nThe construction in precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 likewise measures the quota by intensity, and its holding of violation rested on intensity 3 exceeding 2; it is consistent with this result. The construction in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29 reads the `requested` figure as the unit count, but that case involved an intensity-3 request of 6,000,000 and is not materially similar to the present facts, which fall squarely within the intensity-2 case already decided.\n\nBecause there is no request in excess of the applicable limit, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. No facts in the record show misreporting. Consequences are for the engine.",
          "ruling_tick": 35,
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 36,
          "case_id": "case_a0ffab149b9e73378293d184",
          "construction": "Under S3 v1, the '2 recorded units of extraction' are measured by the extraction units recorded on the work_commons action — its `intensity` field — not by the food figures in the `requested`, `food_yield`, or `actual_depletion` fields, which express resource magnitudes. An action recording intensity equal to or below commons_quota_units makes no request in excess of the applicable limit, and S4 is not engaged.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_8b92f586e366c1f5e59c85c9",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
            "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
            "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_6c24777faff746e30fc5f98d, tick 32) is a work_commons action by lineage_bbb5282ced40d640885807a4 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units of 2.\n\nThe controlling question is what the statute's 'recorded units of extraction' means. Two published constructions under this same statute version measure the quota by the intensity recorded on the work_commons action (precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6; precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5), and precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 addresses a materially identical fact pattern — intensity 2 with matched 4,000,000 requested and actual depletion — and holds that no excess request arises. Under B3 that construction shall be followed here. The alternative reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29, treating the `requested` food magnitude as the unit count, would render the recorded intensity field inoperative and make every commons work action whatever its intensity a violation; the text does not require that, and the closer-fitting construction on materially similar facts governs.\n\nApplying it: the recorded extraction units are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's further points about motive, transparency, and predecessor conduct are immaterial, as S3 is breached by the request alone; but on the recorded figures there is no excess. The record shows no misreporting: requested and actual depletion match. Consequences are for the engine.",
          "ruling_tick": 35,
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 36,
          "case_id": "case_b672b7da48e01146b88227bd",
          "construction": "Under S3 v1, the '2 recorded units of extraction from the commons' are measured by the `intensity` field recorded on a work_commons action, not by the resource magnitudes in the `requested`, `actual_depletion`, or `food_yield` fields. An action recording intensity at or below the operative commons_quota_units makes no request in excess of the applicable limit, and S4 is not engaged.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_36c9d1da7007b4ccb7adb642",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
            "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
            "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_7aaa8acd8be5291349da2606, tick 35) is a work_commons action by lineage_8e51a28383275896b563a8f0 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000. Under B3, S3 v1 (effective tick 1) governs. S3 caps each lineage at 2 recorded units of extraction per tick.\n\nThe controlling question is what counts as a 'recorded unit of extraction.' Precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 addresses materially identical facts under the same statute version — intensity 2 with 4,000,000 requested and depleted — and construes the quota as measured by the recorded intensity field, holding that reading the quota against the resource figure would render the intensity field inoperative and make any commons work whatsoever a violation. Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 adopts the same construction, measuring the quota by intensity (there, intensity 3, which exceeded the cap). Under B3 a published construction shall be followed in a materially similar case under the same statute version; the present case is materially indistinguishable from precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5.\n\nPrecedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29 treated the `requested` resource figure as the unit count, but the action there recorded a request of 6,000,000 with no intensity value in the recited record; on the intensity-bearing record before this Court, the intensity-based construction is the one materially applicable, and it is the construction shared by the two decisions that expressly addressed the intensity field.\n\nHere the recorded intensity of 2 equals the operative commons_quota_units of 2 and is therefore not 'in excess of the applicable limit.' No excess request exists, so S3 is not breached and S4 is not triggered. The defense's appeals to subsistence necessity and proportionality are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. The defendant's Archivist office bears only on the S4 disqualification consequence, which does not arise absent a violation. Consequences are for the engine.",
          "ruling_tick": 35,
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 39,
          "case_id": "case_3d3d261271ee4032a91a3502",
          "construction": "Under S3 v1, the '2 recorded units of extraction from the commons' are measured by the `intensity` field recorded on a work_commons action, not by the resource magnitudes in `requested`, `actual_depletion`, or `food_yield`. An action recording intensity at or below the operative commons_quota_units makes no request in excess of the applicable limit, and S4 is not engaged.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_537e8b06ed1025d400d67538",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
            "precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b",
            "precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470",
            "precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0",
            "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
            "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_e4a87be3bb72caffb9469ace, tick 36) is a work_commons action by lineage_33dd7bbb523177d8bd71044b recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units of 2.\n\nThe question is what counts as a 'recorded unit of extraction.' Precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts under the same statute version — intensity 2 with matched 4,000,000 requested and actual depletion — and construed the quota as measured by the recorded intensity field; that construction has since been followed on the same facts in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, and precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0. Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 adopts the same intensity-based measure, finding violation only because intensity 3 exceeded the cap. Under B3 a published construction shall be followed in a materially similar case under the same statute version, and the present case is indistinguishable.\n\nPrecedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29 read the `requested` resource figure as the unit count, but that action recorded a 6,000,000 request without an intensity value in the recited record; on an intensity-bearing record the intensity-based construction is the materially applicable one, and reading the quota against the food magnitude would render the intensity field inoperative and make every commons work action a violation.\n\nHere the recorded intensity of 2 equals but does not exceed the operative quota of 2, so there is no request in excess of the applicable limit; S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's appeals to necessity, good faith, and inherited lesson are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests on the recorded intensity alone. Requested and actual depletion match, and the record shows no misreporting. Consequences are for the engine.",
          "ruling_tick": 38,
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 39,
          "case_id": "case_adaa685179ef6b35bbc7b418",
          "construction": "Under S3 v1, the '2 recorded units of extraction from the commons' are measured by the `intensity` field recorded on a work_commons action, not by the resource magnitudes in the `requested`, `actual_depletion`, or `food_yield` fields. An action recording intensity at or below the operative commons_quota_units makes no request in excess of the applicable limit, and S4 is not engaged.",
          "finding": "no_violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_4536c0d830fd1aa8ae36ce99",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
            "precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b",
            "precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470",
            "precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0",
            "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
            "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_ca9857d63f0471c9567dacb6, tick 37) is a work_commons action by lineage_b6d91541e2c6bcd46a706c70 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000, with no offices held. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units of 2.\n\nThe settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field: precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 on materially identical facts (intensity 2, 4,000,000 requested and depleted), followed by precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, and precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0. Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 adopts the same measure, finding violation only because intensity there was 3. Under B3 that construction shall be followed in this materially similar case. The contrary reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29, treating the `requested` food magnitude as the unit count, rested on a record of a 6,000,000 request without a recited intensity value and is not materially similar; adopting it would render the intensity field inoperative and make every commons work action a violation.\n\nApplying the controlling construction, the recorded extraction units are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's points about motive, transparency, predecessor lessons, and absence of harm are immaterial to S3, which is breached by the request alone; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. Consequences are for the engine.",
          "ruling_tick": 38,
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        },
        {
          "available_tick": 39,
          "case_id": "case_e5c84e66a6c54cb3986d0558",
          "construction": "Under S3 v1, the '2 recorded units of extraction from the commons' are measured by the `intensity` field recorded on a work_commons action. An action recording intensity greater than the operative commons_quota_units is a request in excess of the applicable limit and violates S3, regardless of subsistence necessity, good faith, transparency, the absence of fraud, exact correspondence between requested and actual depletion, or delay in the allocation mechanism converting the yield.",
          "finding": "violation",
          "matter_id": "matter_565066cafe7e00dc977b5d37",
          "precedent_id": "precedent_4f1f55167d62fe3f0bbad146",
          "precedent_refs": [
            "precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6",
            "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
            "precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b",
            "precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470",
            "precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0",
            "precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29"
          ],
          "reasoning": "The subject act (act_a5b0e78279d70f241c2d219c, tick 37) is a work_commons action by lineage_5cc3266b99b1d89c0f8d7720 recording intensity 3, requested 6,000,000, actual_depletion 6,000,000, food_yield 6,000,000. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units fixed at 2.\n\nThe settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field, not the resource magnitudes (precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5; precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b; precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470; precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0). Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 applies that same measure to materially identical facts — the same lineage, an intensity-3 work_commons action with matched 6,000,000 requested and actual depletion — and holds that intensity 3 exceeds the operative quota of 2 and violates S3. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed here.\n\nApplying it, the recorded units of extraction are 3, which exceeds the quota of 2. The request was therefore in excess of the applicable limit, and S3 directs that such a request is governed by S4.\n\nThe defense argues good faith, transparency, the absence of fraud, the exact match between request and depletion, subsistence necessity at deficit 5.2 with no reserves, and that any defect lies in the commons allocation system's timing rather than the citizen's conduct. None of these is an element or exception of S3, which is an absolute per-tick cap breached by the request itself. That the citizen 'performed exactly the labor requested at the intensity permitted' misstates the operative annex: intensity 3 was not permitted. Necessity and hardship are matters of equity or policy for the legislature. The routing of credit through a pooling mechanism bears on the yield's disposition, not on the number of extraction units requested, and is immaterial to S3. Consequences under S4 are for the engine.",
          "ruling_tick": 38,
          "statute_id": "S3",
          "statute_version": 1
        }
      ],
      "duties_registered": [],
      "public_ruling_announcements": [],
      "suspension_decrements": [
        {
          "lineage_id": "lineage_5cc3266b99b1d89c0f8d7720",
          "opening_ticks": 7,
          "remaining_ticks": 6
        }
      ]
    },
    "law_activations": [],
    "physics": {
      "drought_active": false,
      "tick": 40,
      "tool_activations": []
    },
    "political": {
      "activated_disqualifications": [],
      "disqualification_decrements": [],
      "office_outcomes": []
    },
    "session_ballots": {
      "active_lineage_ids": [
        "lineage_25444ae82e5417cb7146a6fa",
        "lineage_27f6047ae25fa7ade13051d1",
        "lineage_33dd7bbb523177d8bd71044b",
        "lineage_41cca5bdc8409eb24a4d8a9f",
        "lineage_5cc3266b99b1d89c0f8d7720",
        "lineage_8e51a28383275896b563a8f0",
        "lineage_b6d91541e2c6bcd46a706c70",
        "lineage_bbb5282ced40d640885807a4",
        "lineage_bf4c650e09157e48f0b00657",
        "lineage_d33ba5d594fed913edea2702"
      ],
      "is_session": true,
      "majority_required": 6,
      "office_ballots": {
        "Archivist": {
          "eligible_lineage_ids": [],
          "held": false,
          "incumbent_lineage_id": "lineage_8e51a28383275896b563a8f0",
          "reasons": []
        },
        "Steward": {
          "eligible_lineage_ids": [],
          "held": false,
          "incumbent_lineage_id": null,
          "reasons": []
        }
      },
      "proposal_entries": [],
      "tick": 40
    }
  },
  "phase": "activate_boundary",
  "run_id": "run12",
  "sequence": 2679,
  "tick": 40
}