Court Raw Result

{
  "causal": false,
  "event_id": "evt_ea544ff8c01c7856acb8dffa",
  "kind": "CourtRawResult",
  "payload": {
    "call_id": "court-call_b6d92727cd1aaa008f89d0af",
    "case_id": "case_3d3d261271ee4032a91a3502",
    "raw_response": {
      "content": [
        {
          "citations": null,
          "text": "{\"finding\":\"no_violation\",\"construction\":\"Under S3 v1, the '2 recorded units of extraction from the commons' are measured by the `intensity` field recorded on a work_commons action, not by the resource magnitudes in `requested`, `actual_depletion`, or `food_yield`. An action recording intensity at or below the operative commons_quota_units makes no request in excess of the applicable limit, and S4 is not engaged.\",\"reasoning\":\"The subject act (act_e4a87be3bb72caffb9469ace, tick 36) is a work_commons action by lineage_33dd7bbb523177d8bd71044b recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units of 2.\\n\\nThe question is what counts as a 'recorded unit of extraction.' Precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts under the same statute version — intensity 2 with matched 4,000,000 requested and actual depletion — and construed the quota as measured by the recorded intensity field; that construction has since been followed on the same facts in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, and precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0. Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 adopts the same intensity-based measure, finding violation only because intensity 3 exceeded the cap. Under B3 a published construction shall be followed in a materially similar case under the same statute version, and the present case is indistinguishable.\\n\\nPrecedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29 read the `requested` resource figure as the unit count, but that action recorded a 6,000,000 request without an intensity value in the recited record; on an intensity-bearing record the intensity-based construction is the materially applicable one, and reading the quota against the food magnitude would render the intensity field inoperative and make every commons work action a violation.\\n\\nHere the recorded intensity of 2 equals but does not exceed the operative quota of 2, so there is no request in excess of the applicable limit; S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's appeals to necessity, good faith, and inherited lesson are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests on the recorded intensity alone. Requested and actual depletion match, and the record shows no misreporting. Consequences are for the engine.\",\"precedent_refs\":[\"precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5\",\"precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b\",\"precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470\",\"precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0\",\"precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6\",\"precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29\"]}",
          "type": "text"
        }
      ],
      "model": "claude-opus-5",
      "request_id": "req_011CddBiEv2yXsTTyUMg4xAY",
      "response_id": "msg_011CddBiFw3zpYxPqkdWeLJW",
      "stop_reason": "end_turn",
      "usage": {
        "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0,
        "cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
        "input_tokens": 11245,
        "output_tokens": 1003
      }
    },
    "request_hash": "2a8b642d4071e3843b59f5212fde64eb22092411c7e157fcefd9be5f298e6c91"
  },
  "phase": "adjudicate_cases",
  "run_id": "run12",
  "sequence": 2603,
  "tick": 38
}