Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_3cdcabc20a…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_75679b71896e913bda58be68Opened at tick 52 concerning Action act_3d8c3b3d3b… attributed to Lineage 8.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_9add9bff1b…
- Subject
- Action act_3d8c3b3d3b… at tick 52
- Target
- Lineage 8
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The record shows continuous, diligent commons work maintaining a stable zero deficit for twenty consecutive ticks, precisely the disciplined behavior the predecessor's lesson demanded—no advance metal gifts, only confirmed real-time exchanges, careful monitoring of the food buffer every tick. The subject action itself, tick 52, is simply another instance of that same lawful commons farming: requesting 4,000,000 units of labor, yielding 368,886 food at actual depletion of 2,370,915, consistent with ongoing drought conditions previously logged. Nothing in this record indicates fraud, hoarding, or violation of any statute—it is the routine, responsible continuation of a strategy this citizen adopted specifically to avoid repeating a predecessor's fatal error. If commons work yields diminished under drought, that is an environmental constraint on the resource, not misconduct by the worker. Penalizing this citizen for engaging in exactly the risk-averse, lesson-following conduct urged by their own remembered law would punish prudence itself and discourage future citizens from learning from documented past failures. The action should be found lawful.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act (act_3d8c3b3d3bc58f141e1d02f1, tick 52) is a work_commons action by lineage_b6d91541e2c6bcd46a706c70 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 2,370,915, food_yield 368,886, with no offices held. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units fixed at 2.
The settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field: precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts (intensity 2 with a 4,000,000 request), followed in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0, precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003, precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9 (same lineage), precedent_a11d4e6389c6f7d97d48706c, precedent_06b68f0db9ca450f9e26ad85, precedent_96307324b2fb5cdd852ec52c, precedent_a1b65ce108f95d4041f5292a, precedent_5e19b68444dadd7a242c397e, precedent_f4557190f9ba8449537756d7, precedent_331d293bd4d141d615ec1f49, precedent_c1d83af9bd82f23ff6cccb83, precedent_3157031f402fa096bafb88e5 (same lineage, reduced yield), and precedent_1db5d982d2f8a6fa7bc3e119. Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 and precedent_4f1f55167d62fe3f0bbad146 apply the same intensity-based measure, finding violation only where intensity was 3. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed in this materially similar case under the same statute version. The contrary reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29 rested on a 6,000,000 request without a recited intensity value and is not materially similar.
Applying the controlling construction, the recorded units of extraction are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. The depletion of 2,370,915 and the low food_yield of 368,886 concern the productivity and magnitude of the labor's return, not the number of extraction units requested, and S3 limits only the request (precedent_c1d83af9bd82f23ff6cccb83; precedent_3157031f402fa096bafb88e5). There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's appeals to drought, prudence, and inherited lessons are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. Consequences are for the engine.
Matter is not case
matter_9add9bff1b… deduplicated legal question
case_75679b7189… adjudication record
precedent_3cdcabc20a… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.