Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_a1b65ce108…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_50b4e5b7f1d04d4e0d008f46Opened at tick 48 concerning Action act_e0b719e117… attributed to Lineage 9.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_6f4603b3aa…
- Subject
- Action act_e0b719e117… at tick 47
- Target
- Lineage 9
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject action for tick 47 shows plain compliance with the very lesson this lineage was meant to apply: intensity-2 commons work, requested 4,000,000 food yield matched exactly by actual_depletion of 4,000,000, with deficit held stable at zero. There is no metal-for-food gamble here, no unconfirmed trade, no reliance on reciprocity—precisely the discipline the inherited brief demanded after the prior famine. The journal record for eighteen consecutive ticks, including tick 47 itself, documents consistent direct food production during an active drought, adjusting behavior to worsening conditions rather than ignoring them. Whatever prior lineage failure prompted scrutiny occurred before this life and under different, metal-trading circumstances entirely absent from this action. Judging this citizen for act_e0b719e117e80930d3c2e4a4 penalizes the exact corrective conduct the law's own lesson prescribed. No deficit resulted, no waste occurred, and no statute is shown to have been violated by requesting and receiving matched, needed commons yield during a declared emergency-equivalent drought period.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act (act_e0b719e117e80930d3c2e4a4, tick 47) is a work_commons action by lineage_bbb5282ced40d640885807a4 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000, with no offices held. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units fixed at 2.
The settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field: precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts (intensity 2 with matched 4,000,000 requested and actual depletion), and that construction has been followed in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0, precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003, precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9, precedent_a11d4e6389c6f7d97d48706c, precedent_06b68f0db9ca450f9e26ad85, and precedent_96307324b2fb5cdd852ec52c — several involving this same lineage on the same figures. Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 and precedent_4f1f55167d62fe3f0bbad146 apply the same intensity-based measure, finding violation only where intensity was 3. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed in this materially similar case under the same statute version.
The contrary reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29, treating the `requested` food magnitude as the unit count, rested on a 6,000,000 request without a recited intensity value and is not materially similar; adopting it would render the intensity field inoperative and make every commons work action a violation.
Applying the controlling construction, the recorded extraction units are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's appeals to necessity, drought conditions, inherited lessons, and absence of harm are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. Requested and actual depletion match and no misreporting appears in the record. Consequences are for the engine.
Matter is not case
matter_6f4603b3aa… deduplicated legal question
case_50b4e5b7f1… adjudication record
precedent_a1b65ce108… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.