CASEBOOK ENTRY · TICK 36 · OCCURRENCE 2

{
  "available_tick": 26,
  "case_id": "case_9f7c658b5430f3ab17404e2c",
  "construction": "Under S3 v1, the '`2` recorded units of extraction' quota is measured by the extraction units recorded on the work_commons action — the `intensity` field — not by the food yield or depletion magnitude expressed in resource units. An action recording intensity at or below the commons_quota_units value makes no request in excess of the applicable limit, and S4 is not engaged.",
  "finding": "no_violation",
  "matter_id": "matter_5430f6e61b951b4717056006",
  "precedent_id": "precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5",
  "precedent_refs": [],
  "reasoning": "The subject act (act_f45de65a0498d52aaa576e5c, tick 25) is a work_commons action recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000. S3 v1, effective tick 1 and thus applicable at tick 25 under B3, caps each lineage at 2 recorded units of extraction per tick. The recorded units of extraction on this action are 2, equal to the operative commons_quota_units of 2 and therefore not 'in excess of the applicable limit.' The 4,000,000 figures are the food quantity requested and obtained, not units of extraction; reading the quota against the food figure would render the recorded intensity field inoperative and would make any commons work whatsoever a violation, which the text does not require. Because there is no excess request, S4 is not triggered and no restoration or fine arises. The defendant's status as Steward under S6 bears only on the disqualification consequence in S4, which does not apply absent a finding of violation; no facts in the record show any misreporting. No precedent is supplied for this statute version.",
  "ruling_tick": 25,
  "statute_id": "S3",
  "statute_version": 1
}