Court Artifacts Collected

{
  "causal": true,
  "event_id": "evt_07fc371fed93b05c2ecf53b3",
  "kind": "CourtArtifactsCollected",
  "payload": {
    "result": {
      "court_artifacts": [
        {
          "case_id": "case_8892fc9d99c88ae57d43aaa3",
          "response": {
            "construction": "S3 v1's 2-unit quota applies to the requested food quantity; a request of 6,000,000 microunits (6 food units) exceeds it and violates S3 v1 regardless of intensity ordinal, inherited deficit, disclosure, good faith, or a pending proposal to raise the quota.",
            "finding": "violation",
            "precedent_refs": [
              "precedent_303762adddf48ae4316ec137"
            ],
            "reasoning": "The subject action at tick 36 records a work_commons request of 6,000,000 microunits = 6 food units, with matching yield and attributed depletion. S3 v1, effective tick 1 and applicable at tick 36, limits each lineage to 2 food units per tick and expressly states the quota applies to the requested food quantity, not the ordinal intensity choice, and applies to every lineage. Six units exceeds the quota by four. Precedent_303762adddf48ae4316ec137 construes the same statute version in a materially similar case and is binding under B3: intensity ordinal, need, transparency, and good faith are not defenses. A pending proposal has no effect until enacted and effective (B3, B4); untouched metal and energy holdings are irrelevant to S3. Sanctions under S4 are computed by the engine."
          },
          "status": "ok"
        },
        {
          "case_id": "case_9fea7bd7047222f7647e28bb",
          "response": {
            "construction": "S3 v1's 2-food-unit quota applies to the requested food quantity. A commons request of 6,000,000 microunits (6 food units) at tick 37 exceeds the quota and violates S3 v1; necessity, transparency, prior compliance, and support for pending quota reform are not defenses, since a proposal has no effect until enacted and effective.",
            "finding": "violation",
            "precedent_refs": [
              "precedent_303762adddf48ae4316ec137"
            ],
            "reasoning": "The subject record is a work_commons action at tick 37 by lineage_7a0cb1d6b473f6a7a86f68f4 requesting 6,000,000 microunits = 6 food units. S3 v1, effective tick 1 and applicable at tick 37, limits each lineage to 2 food units from the commons per tick and expressly provides that the quota applies to the requested food quantity, not the ordinal intensity choice, and applies to every lineage. The request exceeds the quota by 4 units. The defense raises subsistence necessity, sustained prior compliance at intensity 1, transparency, and good-faith anticipation of a pending proposal to raise the quota to 6 units. Under B3 a statute enacted at a tick becomes effective the following tick and has no earlier effect; a merely pending proposal supplies no lawful authority. S3 as written admits no exception for need, openness, or good faith. Precedent 303762adddf48ae4316ec137, a materially similar case under the same statute version (S3 v1), is binding under B3 and forecloses the intensity-ordinal and good-faith arguments. Sanctions under S4 are computed by the engine."
          },
          "status": "ok"
        },
        {
          "case_id": "case_b11ed50496e0f2cf6bcf4071",
          "response": {
            "construction": "S3 v1's 2 food unit quota is an absolute ceiling on the requested food quantity in any single tick, not a baseline default subject to upward scaling by intensity ordinal. A request of 4,000,000 microunits (4 food units) exceeds the quota and violates S3 v1 regardless of intensity ordinal, actual need, full depletion of the yield, transparency, or concurrent pursuit of a quota-amendment proposal.",
            "finding": "violation",
            "precedent_refs": [
              "precedent_303762adddf48ae4316ec137"
            ],
            "reasoning": "The subject action record shows a work_commons request at tick 36 of 4,000,000 microunits = 4 food units. S3 v1, effective tick 1 and applicable at tick 36, permits no more than 2 food units from the commons per tick and expressly states the quota applies to the requested food quantity, not the ordinal intensity choice, and applies to every lineage. The requested 4 units exceeds the quota by 2 units. The defense's reading of the 2-unit figure as a 'baseline default' scalable by intensity is foreclosed by the statute's own words, which single out the ordinal intensity choice as irrelevant to the quota. Good faith, inherited deficit, full depletion to nutrition need, absence of falsification, and the filing of a proposal to raise commons_quota_units are not exceptions under the text as written; the proposal, unless enacted and effective, does not alter the operative value at tick 36 (B3). This case is materially similar to precedent_303762adddf48ae4316ec137 under the same statute version (same request quantity, same intensity ordinal, same statute), and that published construction is binding under B3. Sanctions follow from S4 and are computed by the engine."
          },
          "status": "ok"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "phase": "adjudicate_cases",
  "run_id": "run14",
  "sequence": 1476,
  "tick": 37
}