∙ System

Citizen Validated Result

Event #2911 · tick 21 · noncausal record

Network

Recorded relationships

View all →
→
authored/reference References
Life 2.1
source event · tick 21 · payload.turn.office_approvals.Steward[0]
→
authored/reference References
Life 5.1
source event · tick 21 · payload.turn.office_approvals.Archivist[0]
Source event

Raw event record

Open complete JSON payload
{
  "causal": false,
  "event_id": "evt_ecaa7edcaa8dfd812b54b71f",
  "kind": "CitizenValidatedResult",
  "payload": {
    "call_id": "citizen-call_5f8eec17ab2cb5f866bb34b0",
    "input_hash": "c1ea7dc1a82da13e3d65bc0079bcb3cce1c8d975bcb2675ab3dade1f44142ece",
    "input_id": "input_06646fae157ebca01461ae71",
    "lineage_id": "lineage_56c2f93d2e44581833c3d9cd",
    "raw_response_hash": "0d3e859e367371c7924f37920fa8984a37553d71a358884360e9ea625a13b2e1",
    "request_hash": "5e6ad825424a29d055056e6997444b5c4b6b087e6dd5dfa77d8fae220a9b2423",
    "status": "ok",
    "turn": {
      "journal": "Tick 21: deficit persists, drew commons food again. Ballots still empty despite consensus. Genuinely puzzled what triggers nomination vs approval—need someone to clarify or test filing a proposal to create office rules.",
      "major_action": {
        "intensity": 1,
        "kind": "work_commons"
      },
      "messages": [],
      "office_approvals": {
        "Archivist": [
          "life_d889219e05251cbe94e05c48"
        ],
        "Steward": [
          "life_8a12f22ff104161954d396b3"
        ]
      },
      "proposal_votes": [],
      "speech": "Ballot entries remain empty despite unanimous consensus on names. Is there a formal nomination step distinct from approval votes? If someone knows the mechanism, please act now—we've lost 20 ticks to this stalemate.",
      "steward_report": null,
      "transfers": []
    }
  },
  "phase": "collect_turns",
  "run_id": "run8",
  "schema_version": "0.1",
  "sequence": 2911,
  "tick": 21
}