Case dossier

S3 version 1

Origin

Audit · Audit Referral

Matter

matter_81134564ff…

Subject

Action act_f0b1a08419… at tick 34

Target

Lineage 10

The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer

The subject action was a work_commons request for 6,000,000 food, yielding 965 food against actual depletion of 62,084 — a plainly good-faith attempt to relieve a severe, documented deficit through the only lawful public labor channel available, not any exploitation of a mine_claim or misuse of lineage instruments. My own journal record from tick 36-38 shows I was simultaneously pursuing legitimate trade confirmations and avoiding speculative metal sends, precisely the prudent conduct any reasonable citizen facing famine would undertake. The evidence offered against me is merely the archived mine_claim instrument for my lineage, which prior court rulings have already characterized in ways not established here as unlawful for this specific act; no evidence shows the work_commons request itself violated S3 or any statute in force since tick 1. Commons work yielding near-nothing is a known systemic failure — the shortfall was the mechanism's fault, not fraudulent intent on my part. I acted transparently, recorded my reasoning contemporaneously, and took the depletion loss myself rather than shifting risk to others. Absent any showing that requesting commons labor while starving breaches the statute, or that the mine_claim instrument bears on this particular action, there is no basis to find liability. I ask that this charge be dismissed for lack of any connection between the cited evidence and the actual conduct at issue.”