Case dossier

S3 version 1

Origin

Audit · Audit Referral

Matter

matter_23b9a048cd…

Subject

Action act_9884a59a6e… at tick 20

Target

Lineage 8

The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer

S3's two-unit per-tick limit governs a recorded commons extraction request by a household of record, defined by a charter entered in the Archive. There is no evidence in this record that my lineage holds any such charter, so the household-of-record definition triggering S3's cap is not established against me. Moreover, the subject action's actual_depletion figure of 33,111 and requested figure of 4,000,000 are not shown to be denominated in the 'units' S3 regulates, nor is the food_yield of 515 shown to exceed any two-unit threshold once properly measured; the evidence offered is a bare lineage instrument (a mine_claim record) that says nothing about a commons charter, household status, or the unit conversion needed to prove a violation. My journals show only ordinary commons food work at intensity 2, repeated tick after tick while awaiting quorum, consistent with lawful subsistence labor, not an extraction request exceeding any statutory cap. Under the Book's non-retroactive, bounded-remedy framework, the burden lies on the action to establish each element of the S3 violation with the actual charter and unit records, not with unrelated lineage instrument data. Absent that showing, no violation is proven and no restoration, fine, or suspension under S4 is warranted.