Case dossier

The subject is a work_commons action at tick 26 by lineage_a8b89381c81ad1617535d5a9 recording requested 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 recorded units, against S3 v1's operative limit of 2 units. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1 and S4 v1, effective tick 1. The defense's contention that only actual depletion (66,222) or yield (1,029) matters is rejected: S3 governs what a household "may request," and S4 measures restoration by "excess request" capped by attributed depletion, confirming the request figure is the regulated quantity. Good faith, food-first motive, and the absence of enacted quota statutes are not defenses in the text; S3 v1 was effective from tick 1. The charge nonetheless fails on the predicate element. S3 imposes its limit only on "a household of record," expressly defined as "a household holding a charter entered in the Archive." The sole Archive evidence for this lineage is an archive_lineage_instrument whose instrument field reads "mine_claim," and S6 separately lists "charters, claims, and published judgments," so a mine_claim is not a charter. Nothing else in the canonical input records a charter for this lineage, and I may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version (precedent_831ca18856a72d3b2ad5da69, precedent_194da607b649206a7be4d3e3, precedent_5703e268875a40a417b60895, and the later applications), one of which concerns this same lineage and the same mine_claim instrument; under B3 those constructions bind. The definitional element fails, so no S3 violation is established and no S4 restoration, fine, suspension, or disqualification arises. No remedy offers were supplied.