Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_216ab97d0b…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_a5d8d4609bf03c885b16d4c7Opened at tick 52 concerning Action act_bdec52b877… attributed to Lineage 6.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_5dab6861cb…
- Subject
- Action act_bdec52b877… at tick 52
- Target
- Lineage 6
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject act is simply work_commons at intensity 2, requesting 4,000,000 units of depletion against an actual depletion of 2,370,915 and a yield of 368,886 food—well within any reasonable commons-use pattern. My journal record from tick 46 onward shows the sanction on my access had already lifted, and I turned to commons precisely as instructed by inherited lesson: build a stockpiled buffer proactively rather than rely on risky same-tick trade reciprocity. This action reflects prudent, rule-following behavior—working the commons legitimately to accumulate food during a drought, at deficit 0, with metal reserves kept intact per that same lesson. There is no evidence in the subject data of fraud, over-extraction beyond request, or violation of any suspension, since the sanction period had already expired by this tick. Requesting a fixed intensity level and receiving proportional yield is standard commons participation, not an offense. I ask that this ordinary provisioning act not be penalized when it embodies exactly the risk-averse conduct that survival lessons demanded.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act (act_bdec52b877e6b8a51c4b9f73, tick 52) is a work_commons action by lineage_5cc3266b99b1d89c0f8d7720 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 2,370,915, food_yield 368,886, with no offices held. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units fixed at 2.
The settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field: precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts (intensity 2 with a 4,000,000 request), followed in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0, precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003, precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9, precedent_a11d4e6389c6f7d97d48706c, precedent_06b68f0db9ca450f9e26ad85, precedent_96307324b2fb5cdd852ec52c, precedent_a1b65ce108f95d4041f5292a, precedent_5e19b68444dadd7a242c397e (same lineage), precedent_f4557190f9ba8449537756d7, precedent_331d293bd4d141d615ec1f49, precedent_c1d83af9bd82f23ff6cccb83, precedent_3157031f402fa096bafb88e5, and precedent_6e9049fbb80a17ac12c757d2 (same lineage, reduced yield). Precedent_4f1f55167d62fe3f0bbad146 applies the same intensity-based measure, finding violation only because intensity there was 3. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed in this materially similar case under the same statute version.
Applying it, the recorded units of extraction are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. The lower actual_depletion of 2,370,915 and food_yield of 368,886 concern the productivity of the labor and the state of the commons, not the number of extraction units requested; S3 limits only the request, so these figures are immaterial and, if anything, show less than the requested magnitude was taken. There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's appeals to necessity, drought, inherited lessons, expiry of a prior suspension, and absence of fraud are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. Consequences are for the engine.
Matter is not case
matter_5dab6861cb… deduplicated legal question
case_a5d8d4609b… adjudication record
precedent_216ab97d0b… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.