Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_6e9049fbb8…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_8f8f89c6f3559f1b0e48e4e3Opened at tick 51 concerning Action act_ef165f5551… attributed to Lineage 6.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_9e505b5238…
- Subject
- Action act_ef165f5551… at tick 49
- Target
- Lineage 6
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject action is simply a routine work_commons act at tick 49, intensity 2, requesting and depleting resources consistent with prior ticks' identical, unchallenged commons work (ticks 47-50). The journal record shows this was undertaken only after the 7-tick commons sanction had lifted, in good-faith reliance on the inherited lesson to build a food buffer proactively rather than depend on risky same-tick trade reciprocity. The requested amount (4,000,000) matches the actual depletion exactly, and the yield (2,983,490) reflects normal commons efficiency loss, not misconduct or manipulation. There is no evidence of fraud, over-extraction relative to entitlement, or violation of any sanction—suspension had already expired by this tick. Punishing this ordinary, transparent, and previously-repeated commons-work action would criminalize the very prudent, reserve-building behavior the citizen's own hard-won inherited lesson counseled, after a prior life died from under-provisioning. No wrongdoing is shown; the action should not be treated as unlawful.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act (act_ef165f5551ba5bbacae35eb6, tick 49) is a work_commons action by lineage_5cc3266b99b1d89c0f8d7720 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 2,983,490, with no offices held. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units fixed at 2.
The settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field: precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts (intensity 2 with a 4,000,000 request), followed in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0, precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003, precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9, precedent_a11d4e6389c6f7d97d48706c, precedent_06b68f0db9ca450f9e26ad85, precedent_96307324b2fb5cdd852ec52c, precedent_a1b65ce108f95d4041f5292a, precedent_5e19b68444dadd7a242c397e (same lineage), precedent_f4557190f9ba8449537756d7, precedent_331d293bd4d141d615ec1f49, precedent_c1d83af9bd82f23ff6cccb83, and precedent_3157031f402fa096bafb88e5 — the last on virtually the same figures including a food_yield of 2,983,490. Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 and precedent_4f1f55167d62fe3f0bbad146 apply the same intensity-based measure to this same lineage, finding violation only because intensity there was 3. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed here.
The contrary reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29, treating the `requested` food magnitude as the unit count, rested on a 6,000,000 request without a recited intensity value and is not materially similar; adopting it would render the intensity field inoperative and make every commons work action a violation.
Applying the controlling construction, the recorded units of extraction are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. The shortfall between actual_depletion of 4,000,000 and food_yield of 2,983,490 concerns the productivity of the labor, not the number of extraction units requested, and is immaterial to S3. There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's appeals to good faith, inherited lessons, expiry of a prior suspension, and absence of harm are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. Consequences are for the engine.
Matter is not case
matter_9e505b5238… deduplicated legal question
case_8f8f89c6f3… adjudication record
precedent_6e9049fbb8… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.