Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_f7acdce050…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_b7b1d69190908d8e90b87ee2Opened at tick 52 concerning Action act_a362c2b9dd… attributed to Lineage 7.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_42393bc7b2…
- Subject
- Action act_a362c2b9dd… at tick 49
- Target
- Lineage 7
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject action is my tick-49 commons work: intensity 2, requesting 4,000,000 units of depletion, yielding 2,983,490 food. This mirrors every prior tick's identical, transparent practice, faithfully logged and consistent with the inherited lesson to prioritize direct commons food production over fragile trade reciprocity. There is no deception, no misappropriation, and no deviation from stated policy: the requested depletion and resulting yield were disclosed contemporaneously, and the ratio of yield to request reflects ordinary drought-affected regen, not manipulation. Nothing in the record shows this action exceeded authorized intensity, misused the Archivist office, or violated any statute governing commons work. If the concern is that depletion (4,000,000) exceeded yield (2,983,490), that gap is the natural consequence of drought multipliers reducing regen — a documented, foreseeable condition already noted in my own journal at tick 45-51, not an act of bad faith. Absent any specific statutory threshold I breached, this was lawful subsistence conduct and should not be penalized.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act (act_a362c2b9dd0ae5f8707bac62, tick 49) is a work_commons action by lineage_8e51a28383275896b563a8f0 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 2,983,490, with the Archivist office held. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units fixed at 2.
The settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field: precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts (intensity 2 with a 4,000,000 request), followed in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0 (same lineage), precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003, precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9, precedent_a11d4e6389c6f7d97d48706c, precedent_06b68f0db9ca450f9e26ad85, precedent_96307324b2fb5cdd852ec52c, precedent_a1b65ce108f95d4041f5292a, precedent_5e19b68444dadd7a242c397e, precedent_f4557190f9ba8449537756d7, precedent_331d293bd4d141d615ec1f49, precedent_c1d83af9bd82f23ff6cccb83, precedent_3157031f402fa096bafb88e5, and precedent_1db5d982d2f8a6fa7bc3e119 (same lineage, Archivist office, reduced yield). Precedent_4f1f55167d62fe3f0bbad146 applies the same measure, finding violation only where intensity was 3. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed here. The contrary reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29 rested on a 6,000,000 request without a recited intensity value and is not materially similar.
Applying the controlling construction, the recorded units of extraction are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. The gap between actual_depletion of 4,000,000 and food_yield of 2,983,490 concerns the productivity of the labor, not the number of extraction units requested, and is immaterial to S3 (precedent_c1d83af9bd82f23ff6cccb83; precedent_3157031f402fa096bafb88e5). There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defendant's Archivist office bears only on the S4 disqualification consequence, which does not arise absent a violation. The defense's appeals to good faith, drought, and inherited lessons are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. Consequences are for the engine.
Matter is not case
matter_42393bc7b2… deduplicated legal question
case_b7b1d69190… adjudication record
precedent_f7acdce050… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.