Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_3157031f40…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_f6d405c3f5279408f0b2e32eOpened at tick 50 concerning Action act_6c045086f3… attributed to Lineage 8.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_43e2309bea…
- Subject
- Action act_6c045086f3… at tick 49
- Target
- Lineage 8
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject record shows exactly what the journal trail documents: a routine work_commons action at tick 49, intensity 2, requesting 4,000,000 units of commons resource depletion, yielding 2,983,490 food. This is not an advance gift, not an unconfirmed pledge, and not a metal-for-food promise sent on faith. It is the disciplined behavior my predecessor's lesson prescribed—stable, simultaneous commons labor exchanged directly for food, with metal reserves untouched for eighteen consecutive ticks precisely to avoid the trap being punished elsewhere. There is no allegation here that commons was suspended for this actor at this tick, nor any evidence of a reciprocal-trade default, deception, or resource diversion. The requested depletion and yield figures are consistent with normal commons participation, not misconduct. Whatever statute or referral prompted this case, the subject material itself contains no facts establishing a violation—only a citizen doing exactly what responsible, lesson-informed conduct required: working commons for food rather than risking metal on unverified promises. Absent any shown harm, deception, or rule breach in this specific action, the case should not stand against this defendant.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act (act_6c045086f385fc7b681f77ea, tick 49) is a work_commons action by lineage_b6d91541e2c6bcd46a706c70 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 2,983,490, with no offices held. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units fixed at 2.
The settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field: precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts (intensity 2 with matched 4,000,000 requested and actual depletion), and that construction has been followed in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0, precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003, precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9 (same lineage), precedent_a11d4e6389c6f7d97d48706c, precedent_06b68f0db9ca450f9e26ad85, precedent_96307324b2fb5cdd852ec52c, precedent_a1b65ce108f95d4041f5292a, precedent_5e19b68444dadd7a242c397e, and precedent_f4557190f9ba8449537756d7. Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 and precedent_4f1f55167d62fe3f0bbad146 apply the same intensity-based measure, finding violation only where intensity was 3. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed in this materially similar case.
The lower food_yield of 2,983,490 relative to the depletion is a yield magnitude and bears on no element of S3, which limits only the number of recorded extraction units requested. The contrary reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29, treating the `requested` food magnitude as the unit count, rested on a 6,000,000 request without a recited intensity value and is not materially similar; adopting it would render the intensity field inoperative and make every commons work action a violation.
Applying the controlling construction, the recorded extraction units are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's appeals to good faith, inherited lessons, and absence of harm are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. Consequences are for the engine.
Matter is not case
matter_43e2309bea… deduplicated legal question
case_f6d405c3f5… adjudication record
precedent_3157031f40… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.