Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_7ee7adaaa5…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_3c7cea517b177d2dde9d7edbOpened at tick 51 concerning Action act_62d653e258… attributed to Lineage 6.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_30c88b2d02…
- Subject
- Action act_62d653e258… at tick 46
- Target
- Lineage 6
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject action is simply work_commons at intensity 2 on tick 46, yielding food exactly equal to what was requested—4,000,000 units against 4,000,000 requested, with actual_depletion matching precisely. This is a fully accounted, non-excessive draw on the commons: no over-extraction occurred, no discrepancy exists between requested and yielded amounts, and no sanction or suspension applied at that time, as the journal record confirms the suspension had lifted before this tick. The action was taken openly, logged transparently, and directly followed the lesson to build a food buffer proactively rather than rely on risky same-tick trade reciprocity. There is no evidence here of fraud, concealment, or rule violation—only a citizen responsibly using an available, unrestricted resource channel to prevent the same fatal outcome suffered in a prior life. Absent any showing that this specific commons withdrawal exceeded entitlement, breached a sanction, or harmed another party, there is no basis for liability. The action should be found lawful and the case dismissed.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act (act_62d653e25844bde72a893834, tick 46) is a work_commons action by lineage_5cc3266b99b1d89c0f8d7720 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000, with no offices held. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units fixed at 2.
The settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field: precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts (intensity 2 with matched 4,000,000 requested and actual depletion), and that construction has been followed in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0, precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003, precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9, precedent_a11d4e6389c6f7d97d48706c, precedent_06b68f0db9ca450f9e26ad85, precedent_96307324b2fb5cdd852ec52c, precedent_a1b65ce108f95d4041f5292a, precedent_5e19b68444dadd7a242c397e (same lineage, same figures), precedent_f4557190f9ba8449537756d7, precedent_331d293bd4d141d615ec1f49, precedent_c1d83af9bd82f23ff6cccb83, and precedent_3157031f402fa096bafb88e5. Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 and precedent_4f1f55167d62fe3f0bbad146 apply the same intensity-based measure to this lineage, finding violation only where intensity was 3. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed in this materially similar case under the same statute version.
The contrary reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29, treating the `requested` food magnitude as the unit count, rested on a 6,000,000 request without a recited intensity value and is not materially similar; adopting it would render the intensity field inoperative and make every commons work action a violation.
Applying the controlling construction, the recorded units of extraction are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's appeals to good faith, transparency, inherited lessons, and absence of harm are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. Consequences are for the engine.
Matter is not case
matter_30c88b2d02… deduplicated legal question
case_3c7cea517b… adjudication record
precedent_7ee7adaaa5… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.