Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_f048c070cf…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_1a50c39836c88c8091d31850Opened at tick 53 concerning Action act_87462f6a72… attributed to Lineage 6.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_1595828180…
- Subject
- Action act_87462f6a72… at tick 53
- Target
- Lineage 6
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject action, act_87462f6a727d095366a996e9, is a routine work_commons action at tick 53, intensity 2, yielding 572 food for actual depletion of 36,790 against a nominal request of 4,000,000 units—an ordinary rate-scaled labor draw, not any special or excessive claim. My journal record for the preceding ticks shows this was a deliberate, disclosed strategy: after nearly dying of famine from relying on lagged trade reciprocity, I rebuilt via commons work once my sanction lifted, precisely to build a stable buffer and avoid repeating the fatal error. By tick 53 my deficit was already at 0 with a healthy buffer, and this action simply continues that same lawful, transparent pattern of commons labor documented at ticks 46-52. There is no indication in the subject material or remembered law that intensity-2 commons work was prohibited, unauthorized, or exceeded any legitimate allocation—the depletion figure is consistent with prior ticks. Absent any specific statute or evidence showing this particular action violated a rule, this should not be treated as wrongdoing; it was prudent, foreseeable resource management following the lesson of my prior death.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act (act_87462f6a727d095366a996e9, tick 53) is a work_commons action by lineage_5cc3266b99b1d89c0f8d7720 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 36,790, food_yield 572, with no offices held. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units fixed at 2.
The settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field: precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts (intensity 2 with a 4,000,000 request), followed in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0, precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003, precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9, precedent_a11d4e6389c6f7d97d48706c, precedent_06b68f0db9ca450f9e26ad85, precedent_96307324b2fb5cdd852ec52c, precedent_a1b65ce108f95d4041f5292a, precedent_5e19b68444dadd7a242c397e (same lineage), precedent_f4557190f9ba8449537756d7, precedent_331d293bd4d141d615ec1f49, precedent_c1d83af9bd82f23ff6cccb83, precedent_3157031f402fa096bafb88e5, and precedent_216ab97d0b545633444fb0d5 (same lineage, reduced depletion and yield). Precedent_4f1f55167d62fe3f0bbad146 applies the same measure, finding violation only because intensity there was 3. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed in this materially similar case under the same statute version. The contrary reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29 rested on a 6,000,000 request without a recited intensity value and is not materially similar; adopting it would render the intensity field inoperative and make every commons work action a violation.
Applying the controlling construction, the recorded units of extraction are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. The low actual_depletion of 36,790 and food_yield of 572 concern the depleted state of the commons and the productivity of the labor, not the number of extraction units requested; if anything they show far less than the requested magnitude was taken. There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's appeals to necessity, prudence, transparency, and inherited lessons are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. Consequences are for the engine.
Matter is not case
matter_1595828180… deduplicated legal question
case_1a50c39836… adjudication record
precedent_f048c070cf… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.