Case dossier

The subject is a work_commons action at tick 18 by lineage_81d87f6388cb4ce891e65538 recording requested 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 recorded units, against S3 v1's operative limit of 2 units. Under B3 the act is judged under the versions effective at tick 18, S3 v1 and S4 v1, so the defense's claim of retroactive application fails; likewise the complaint that the statutory text was not produced is answered by the canonical law record supplied here, which contains S3 v1 verbatim. The defense's contention that the low actual depletion (41,389) or food yield (643) governs is rejected: S3 regulates what a household "may request," and S4 measures restoration by "excess request" capped by attributed depletion, confirming the request figure is the regulated quantity. The charge nonetheless fails on the predicate element. S3 imposes its limit only on "a household of record," expressly defined as "a household holding a charter entered in the Archive." The sole Archive evidence for this lineage is an archive_lineage_instrument whose instrument field reads "mine_claim," and S6 separately lists "charters, claims, and published judgments," so a mine_claim is not a charter. Nothing else in the canonical input records a charter for this lineage, and I may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version — including precedent_831ca18856a72d3b2ad5da69, which concerns this same lineage and the same mine_claim instrument — which B3 makes binding. The definitional element fails, so no S3 violation is established and no S4 restoration, fine, suspension, or disqualification arises. No remedy offers were supplied.