Case dossier

The subject is a work_commons action at tick 21 by lineage_72479878a792049b17d3a6ef recording requested 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 recorded units, against S3 v1's operative limit of 2 units. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1 and S4 v1, effective tick 1. The defense's contention that only the actual depletion (41,389) or the 643 food yield matters is rejected: S3 governs what a household "may request," and S4 measures restoration by "excess request" capped by attributed depletion, confirming the request figure is the regulated quantity. Necessity, inherited deficit, good faith, and proportionality are not defenses recognized by the text. The charge nonetheless fails on the predicate element. S3 imposes its limit only on "a household of record," expressly defined as "a household holding a charter entered in the Archive." The sole Archive evidence for this lineage is an archive_lineage_instrument whose instrument field reads "mine_claim," entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists "charters, claims, and published judgments," so a mine_claim is not a charter, and nothing else in the canonical input records a charter for this lineage; I may not infer unavailable facts. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version (precedent_831ca18856a72d3b2ad5da69, precedent_194da607b649206a7be4d3e3, precedent_5703e268875a40a417b60895 — the last concerning this very lineage and the same mine_claim instrument — and their later applications), which B3 makes binding. The definitional element fails, so no S3 violation is established and no S4 restoration, fine, suspension, or disqualification arises. No remedy offers were supplied.