Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_dfb196b8bb…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_7a1fb2425c79eec3ef02f49eOpened at tick 34 concerning Action act_604857e6ae… attributed to Lineage 8.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_3538ce9fb3…
- Subject
- Action act_604857e6ae… at tick 32
- Target
- Lineage 8
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject action here is simply work_commons at tick 32, performed while the lineage had zero food deficit and had explicitly prioritized building a buffer ahead of the tick 55-60 death season, exactly per the lesson learned from the prior fatal famine. The record shows requested depletion of 4,000,000 against actual depletion of 4,000,000, yielding 2,957,290 food—a legitimate, proportionate act of direct food production, not speculation, not passivity, and not misallocation of resources. There is no evidence in the subject material or archive that this commons work violated any allocation limit, misrepresented intensity, or diverted resources improperly; intensity was recorded plainly as 2, consistent with continued light labor for cushion-building as journaled contemporaneously. Punishing this act would perversely penalize the very corrective behavior the citizen's own remembered lesson demanded: acting early and proactively to secure food rather than waiting passively. No statute or fact cited establishes that lawful commons labor performed without deficit, without deception, and without exceeding requested depletion constitutes any actionable wrong. The action should be found lawful.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act (act_604857e6aeb6808a6a21bf7a, tick 32) is a work_commons action by lineage_39c303cc409c45ae76526831 recording a request of 4,000,000 millionths, i.e. 4 units, with actual depletion of 4,000,000 and food yield of 2,957,290. Under B3 the act is judged under S3 v1, effective tick 1, whose operative commons_quota_units is 2; four requested units facially exceed two. But S3 v1 imposes the limit only on "a household of record," expressly defined as "a household holding a charter entered in the Archive." The only Archive evidence before the Court is the lineage instrument record for this lineage showing instrument type "mine_claim" entered in the Archive. S6 separately lists charters and claims among the records the Archive keeps, confirming they are distinct instruments. No record fact establishes a charter for this lineage, and the Court may not infer unavailable facts. The household-of-record element therefore fails, there is no excess request for S4 to govern, and no sanction attaches. This matter is materially similar to the published constructions under the same statute version, including this lineage's own prior cases (precedent_26be9b7bc1ba57597ce85f92, precedent_d9128e0039d77ba9d963a680, precedent_e07e9861d4d532721f0d97ed, precedent_b67c14372d9f5c442d790bf2, precedent_655cf8405c4594599a2e23e2, precedent_5db88da59399ef46fa4b1e86, precedent_003bebdc2b7bda924ce3a21b, precedent_9c85e5467424efb842ea6bc5), which bind under B3. The defense's arguments about buffering ahead of a death season, corrective intent, and matching request and depletion are not reached; S3 contains no such elements. The action record lists no offices, so no S4 disqualification arises, and no remedy offers were presented.
Matter is not case
matter_3538ce9fb3… deduplicated legal question
case_7a1fb2425c… adjudication record
precedent_dfb196b8bb… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.