Case dossier

The subject act (act_db9edff446ddd661f5957eaa, tick 53) is a work_commons action by lineage_8e51a28383275896b563a8f0 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 36,790, food_yield 572, with the Archivist office held. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units fixed at 2. The settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field: precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts (intensity 2 with a 4,000,000 request), followed in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0 (same lineage), precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003, precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9, precedent_a11d4e6389c6f7d97d48706c, precedent_06b68f0db9ca450f9e26ad85, precedent_96307324b2fb5cdd852ec52c, precedent_a1b65ce108f95d4041f5292a, precedent_331d293bd4d141d615ec1f49, and precedent_c1d83af9bd82f23ff6cccb83. Most directly, precedent_f048c070cf887df0b5f0d5e7 and precedent_0271f9fa367a47caddb1675d decided tick-53 and tick-54 acts on identical figures — intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 36,790, food_yield 572 — and found no violation. Precedent_1db5d982d2f8a6fa7bc3e119 and precedent_f7acdce050318da9a761b7d4 concern this same lineage while holding the Archivist office and reach the same result. Precedent_4f1f55167d62fe3f0bbad146 applies the same measure, finding violation only where intensity was 3. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed here. The contrary reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29 rested on a 6,000,000 request without a recited intensity value and is not materially similar; adopting it would render the intensity field inoperative and make every commons work action a violation. Applying the controlling construction, the recorded units of extraction are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. The low actual_depletion of 36,790 and food_yield of 572 concern the depleted state of the commons and the productivity of the labor, not the number of extraction units requested. There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defendant's Archivist office bears only on the S4 disqualification consequence, which does not arise absent a violation. The defense's appeals to proportionality, good faith, and inherited lessons are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. Consequences are for the engine.