Merits
- Finding
- No Violation
- Precedent
- precedent_d781439d45…
- Loser payment
- none
No mandatory consequence applied.
Audit channel · Merits
DispositionNo ViolationCase dossier
case_2d31c19b71a1c867dfa6605bOpened at tick 54 concerning Action act_c33ed8d126… attributed to Lineage 9.
S3 version 1
- Origin
- Audit · Audit Referral
- Matter
- matter_88262e8ceb…
- Subject
- Action act_c33ed8d126… at tick 46
- Target
- Lineage 9
The defendant’s current Life was asked to answer
The subject action here is simply work_commons at intensity 2, yielding 4,000,000 food through actual depletion matching the request—a direct, transparent commons labor act, not any metal-for-food trade. My journal record from tick 46 confirms I had already abandoned the failed metal-upfront trading strategy and was following my predecessor's hard-won lesson: secure food directly through commons work rather than gambling on reciprocity. This action is exactly that corrective behavior in practice—no deception, no misrepresentation of yield, no deviation between requested and actual depletion. There is no statute violation apparent in the subject material itself: it is a routine, self-consistent labor record showing responsible adaptation to a known deficit crisis. Whatever liability may attach to prior ticks' metal holdings, this specific act, filed as the subject of the case, records lawful, direct food-producing labor undertaken precisely to comply with the survival principle my own remembered law establishes. Punishing this action would penalize the very corrective conduct that law demands.
Court ruling
validatedNo Violation
The subject act (act_c33ed8d1269c86786f4e6232, tick 46) is a work_commons action by lineage_bbb5282ced40d640885807a4 recording intensity 2, requested 4,000,000, actual_depletion 4,000,000, food_yield 4,000,000, with no offices held. Under B3 the applicable law is S3 v1, effective tick 1, with operative commons_quota_units fixed at 2.
The settled construction under this statute version measures the quota by the recorded intensity field: precedent_41f20c77410e370a4d0430c5 decided materially identical facts (intensity 2 with matched 4,000,000 requested and actual depletion), followed in precedent_0103fce5fb164b96d50a4d0b, precedent_6bf2d787ae3f6afb51642470, precedent_a11d4e6389c6f7d97d48706c, precedent_06b68f0db9ca450f9e26ad85, precedent_96307324b2fb5cdd852ec52c, precedent_a1b65ce108f95d4041f5292a, precedent_f4557190f9ba8449537756d7, and precedent_331d293bd4d141d615ec1f49 — several concerning this same lineage on the same figures — as well as precedent_ffff06226d5ee71c3f64b2f0, precedent_1ded1510f69828b21ee09003, precedent_8fc9d140bda2ac2470502ce9, precedent_7ee7adaaa5cb379fdfb4eb83, and precedent_8b046fb8b0c013ee18c54403 (both tick-46 acts on identical figures). Precedent_a9d7c8aef3300a015bb248b6 and precedent_4f1f55167d62fe3f0bbad146 apply the same intensity-based measure, finding violation only where intensity was 3. Under B3 that published construction shall be followed in this materially similar case. The contrary reading in precedent_c2e5a71d9e90fe08bf703e29 rested on a 6,000,000 request without a recited intensity value and is not materially similar; adopting it would render the intensity field inoperative and make every commons work action a violation.
Applying the controlling construction, the recorded units of extraction are 2, equal to but not in excess of the operative quota of 2. There being no excess request, S3 is not breached and S4 is not engaged. The defense's appeals to good faith, transparency, inherited lessons, and survival necessity are not elements or exceptions of S3 and are not relied upon; the finding rests solely on the recorded intensity. Requested and actual depletion match and the record shows no misreporting. Consequences are for the engine.
Matter is not case
matter_88262e8ceb… deduplicated legal question
case_2d31c19b71… adjudication record
precedent_d781439d45… later-available holding
These IDs resolve into one dossier for navigation while retaining their distinct meanings.